User talk:DrPlantGenomics
Welcome!
[edit]Hello, DrPlantGenomics, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! JarrahTree 23:42, 25 July 2019 (UTC)
great work!
[edit]have tried to add a few items - feel free to query or ask re any of my edits either why or whatever JarrahTree 10:36, 26 July 2019 (UTC)
Thanks ! Where abouts ?
[edit]Which edits did you make and in which page? Hoping to learn ! Thanks. DrPlantGenomics (talk) 11:46, 26 July 2019 (UTC)
- hopefully with your edit count by now you should be able to see things - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sarah_Dunlop JarrahTree 12:03, 26 July 2019 (UTC)
- Living people - on the talk page wikiproject biography and living =yes, and on the category at the front of article living people. JarrahTree 12:23, 26 July 2019 (UTC)
Thank you! Seen them now. Also - wondering why pages go to a wiki section with a number? Is that to check if they are OK, or to suck up extra information? Thanks for all your help, I appreciate your time. :-)
- No problems, sorry I am not helping more, worth learning to WP:SIGN. cheers JarrahTree 13:52, 27 July 2019 (UTC)
user page
[edit]would be well worth un-doing the categories on your user page as they actually link your page to the category. JarrahTree 13:54, 27 July 2019 (UTC) Oh! Thanks! Cool, so many rookie errors! DrPlantGenomics (talk) 14:10, 27 July 2019 (UTC)DrPlantGenomics
- nah - no big deal, there are more trip ups, than in any elusive shakespearian line about twixt and tween - or anything that horatio might say - rule of thumb at this stage - find a similar article - and reverse engineer - many intriguing parts can be found and uncovered... JarrahTree 04:01, 28 July 2019 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
[edit]Thanks for creating Katherine Samaras.
User:Kudpung while reviewing this page as a part of our page curation process had the following comments:
Please correct the format of reference No.8
To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Kudpung}}
. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~
.
Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 00:55, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
Thank you for the comment. I have checked and it looks like it is now fixed (although I am very new). DrPlantGenomicsDrPlantGenomics (talk) 13:48, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Fran Baum
[edit]If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Fran Baum requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://www.flinders.edu.au/people/fran.baum. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 01:23, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
DrPlantGenomics (talk) 07:09, 2 August 2019 (UTC)Thanks for your comments. I added new information from the ABC and The Conversation and other professional science organisations that was separate to the university web page. All the best, DrPlantGenomics DrPlantGenomics (talk) 07:09, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
COI
[edit]You have an obvious conflict of interest, please don't write about yourself, your friends or relatives and read the guidance below
- When you write about a person, you must provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that they meet the notability guidelines. Sources that are not acceptable include those linked to the person or an associated organisation, press releases, YouTube, IMDB, social media and other sites that can be self-edited, blogs, websites of unknown or non-reliable provenance, and sites that are just reporting what the person claims or interviewing them. Note that references should be in-line so we can tell what fact each is supporting, and should not be bare urls
- you must write in a non-promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic, with verifiable facts, not opinions or reviews.
- there shouldn't be any url links in the article, only in the "References" or "External links" sections.
- you must not copy text from elsewhere. Copyrighted text is not allowed in Wikipedia, as outlined in this policy. That applies even to pages created by you or your organisation, unless they state clearly and explicitly that the text is public domain. We require that text posted here can be used, modified and distributed for any purpose, including commercial; text is considered to be copyright unless explicitly stated otherwise. There are ways to donate copyrighted text to Wikipedia, as described here; please note that simply asserting on the talk page that you are the owner of the copyright, or you have permission to use the text, isn't sufficient.
Before attempting to write an article again, please make sure that the topic meets the notability criteria linked above, and check that you can find independent third party sources. Also read Your first article. You must also reply to the COI request above Jimfbleak - talk to me? 06:03, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
DrPlantGenomics (talk) 07:31, 2 August 2019 (UTC) Dear JimfBleak, I am not sure what the COI with Baum is? It is possible that initially there was not enough sources from a variety of locations so I fixed this and more sources were added from The Conversation, from the ABC and also from a professional web page. Thank you for the new things I learned. Best wishes DrPlantGenomics (talk) 07:31, 2 August 2019 (UTC).
Disambiguation link notification for August 2
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Caroline Ford (medical researcher), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page New York (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
Ways to improve Alison Todd
[edit]Hello, DrPlantGenomics,
Thanks for creating Alison Todd! I edit here too, under the username Winged Blades of Godric and it's nice to meet you :-)
I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-
H-index is way too low and the cited coverage (which is mainly on her company) fails to pass GNG for me. See WP:NACADEMIC and WP:GNG. Incline to nominate for deletion.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Winged Blades of Godric}}
. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~
. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.
Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
∯WBGconverse 09:51, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
- We don't prohibit pay-walled sources; feel free to use them:-) ∯WBGconverse 10:29, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
Thanks {{Re|Winged Blades of Godric}}
- what are some examples of pay-walled sources, or what specifically where you talking about for example? Do you mean Scopus or PubMed? I have since added references to each of her references. Also I agree - her H index is low to be notable for an academic so I have removed this. I think she is notable for her 18 patents, and prizes and mentions in the media. I have now added all these. I believe her notability now has evidence, what do you think ? ∯WBGconverseThanks in advance, DrPlantGenomicsDrPlantGenomics (talk) 11:51, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
[edit]The Barnstar of Diligence | |
Thanks for sticking with us. Wikipedia has lots of new rules and we are obsessed with copyright and in pitching our writing as factual as we can make it. Its a different bar to many, but its a great project and I believe you are going to be one of the best Wikipedians. Welcome to Wikipedia and Women in Red Victuallers (talk) 15:48, 2 August 2019 (UTC) |
Welcome!
[edit]Hello, DrPlantGenomics, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Victuallers (talk) 15:44, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
- Moved from User page to Talk page by Oronsay (talk) 19:56, 2 August 2019 (UTC).
Daniela Stock
[edit]Another User, not part of the FW editathon, has started an article on Daniela Stock. If you info to add to it, please do so. Oronsay (talk) 21:50, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
Thanks Oronsay, very cool that others are adding. I have now added info to her page. I hope it meets the requirements. DrPlantGenomics (talk) 04:21, 10 August 2019 (UTC)
Women in Red
[edit]Hi there, DrPlantGenomics, and welcome to Women in Red. I see you have already created a couple of women's biographies and hope there will be many more. Please make sure you include secondary sources (from journals, newspapers and books) which demonstrate notability rather than just primary sources directly related to the individuals you cover. You'll find more advice in our Ten Simple Rules and our Primer for creating women's biographies. Let me know if you run into any difficulties or need assistance. Happy editing!--Ipigott (talk) 08:51, 8 August 2019 (UTC)
Thank you, I've read these primers. Interesting! DrPlantGenomicsDrPlantGenomics (talk) 12:20, 9 August 2019 (UTC)
Caroline Ford
[edit]Hello - you might be interested in this deletion nomination given you were part of the edit-a-thon that tried to get some of these articles. Not sure if you or others involved are aware. Bookscale (talk) 10:03, 12 August 2019 (UTC)
Thank you!
[edit]Thank you for participating in the Franklin Women Wikipedia Edit-a-thon for Women in Health and Medical Research. Your enthusiasm and diligent work has made a real impact – and you’ve truly gone above and beyond by continuing to create so many pages after the event! Looking forward to seeing you around Wikipedia! SnapFreeze (talk) 07:27, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
Oh! That is so lovely! Thanks so much for that comment SnapFreeze. I appreciate you going to the time to let me know.DrPlantGenomics (talk) 08:00, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
Reusing references
[edit]The key to re-using refs is to name them. You will need to edit the source to see it. If you are using the Visual Editor then you will see there is a reuse tab when you are inserting a new ref. HTH - Roger aka Victuallers (talk) 07:58, 16 August 2019 (UTC)
Thank you. Do you have an example of where this is done wrong so I can improve it Roger? Thanks. DrPlantGenomics (talk) 08:24, 16 August 2019 (UTC)
September 2019 at Women in Red
[edit] September 2019, Volume 5, Issue 9, Numbers 107, 108, 132, 133, 134, 135
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 16:23, 27 August 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Congratulations on adding so many women!
[edit]Australian feminist history award | |
Thank you for creating so many articles about Australian women in STEMM! Oronsay (talk) 22:09, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
|
September 2019
[edit]Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Fran Baum, from its old location at User:DrPlantGenomics/sandbox. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. -Liancetalk/contribs 14:26, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
Your user page
[edit]I'm pleased that you've developed your user page. How about adding links to the articles that you've created? Oronsay (talk) 04:31, 17 September 2019 (UTC)
That's a great idea ! DrPlantGenomics (talk) 05:03, 17 September 2019 (UTC)
October Events from Women in Red
[edit] October 2019, Volume 5, Issue 10, Numbers 107, 108, 137, 138, 139, 140
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 17:35, 23 September 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Your submission at Articles for creation: Fran Baum has been accepted
[edit]The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
MurielMary (talk) 11:44, 30 September 2019 (UTC)I have sent you a note about a page you started
[edit]Thanks for creating Lisa Maher.
User:Willbb234 while examining this page as a part of our page curation process had the following comments:
The article seems rather promotional. I will remove promotional information, unless you can say otherwise. I am happy to discuss this. Thanks.
You're welcome. It looks like her page has been edited by many helpful people now and is much stronger. Thanks for your help. DrPlantGenomics (talk) 04:53, 2 October 2019 (UTC)
To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Willbb234}}
. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~
.
Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Willbb234Talk (please {{ping}} me in replies) 09:38, 1 October 2019 (UTC)
November 2019 at Women in Red
[edit] November 2019, Volume 5, Issue 11, Numbers 107, 108, 140, 141, 142, 143
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 22:57, 29 October 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Sarah Dunlop
[edit]Dear @DrPlantGenomics: I reviewed your article. I was wondering if you fancy doing an article for the other Sarah Dunlop. [1] scope_creepTalk 18:20, 30 October 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
[edit]December events with WIR
[edit] December 2019, Volume 5, Issue 12, Numbers 107, 108, 144, 145, 146, 147
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 18:42, 25 November 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
January 2020 at Women in Red
[edit] January 2020, Volume 6, Issue 1, Numbers 146, 148, 149, 150, 151, 153
|
February with Women in Red
[edit] February 2020, Volume 6, Issue 2, Numbers 150, 151, 152, 154, 155
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 19:31, 28 January 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
April 2020 at Women in Red
[edit] April 2020, Volume 6, Issue 4, Numbers 150, 151, 159, 160, 161, 162
Online events:
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 14:58, 23 March 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
May 2020 at Women in Red
[edit] May 2020, Volume 6, Issue 5, Numbers 150, 151, 163, 164, 165, 166
Online events:
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 20:58, 29 April 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
June 2020 at Women in Red
[edit]Women in Red June 2020, Volume 6, Issue 6, Numbers 150, 151, 167, 168, 169
Online events:
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 17:10, 25 May 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
July 2020 at Women in Red
[edit]Women in Red / July 2020, Volume 6, Issue 7, Numbers 150, 151, 170, 171, 172, 173
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 16:10, 28 June 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
August 2020 at Women in Red
[edit]Women in Red | August 2020, Volume 6, Issue 8, Numbers 150, 151, 173, 174, 175
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 18:50, 26 July 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
September Women in Red edithons
[edit]Women in Red | September 2020, Volume 6, Issue 9, Numbers 150, 151, 176, 177
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 17:54, 29 August 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
October editathons from Women in Red
[edit]Women in Red | October 2020, Volume 6, Issue 10, Numbers 150, 173, 178, 179
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 15:09, 21 September 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
November edit-a-thons from Women in Red
[edit]Women in Red | November 2020, Volume 6, Issue 11, Numbers 150, 173, 178, 180, 181
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 18:52, 28 October 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit]December with Women in Red
[edit]Women in Red | December 2020, Volume 6, Issue 12, Numbers 150, 173, 178, 182, 183
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:43, 26 November 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
A New Year With Women in Red!
[edit]Women in Red | January 2021, Volume 7, Issue 1, Numbers 182, 184, 185, 186, 187, 188
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 03:02, 29 December 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
February 2021 at Women in Red
[edit]Women in Red | February 2021, Volume 7, Issue 2, Numbers 184, 186, 188, 189, 190, 191
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 14:58, 27 January 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
March 2021 at Women in Red
[edit]Women in Red | March 2021, Volume 7, Issue 3, Numbers 184, 186, 188, 192, 193
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 18:47, 26 February 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
April editathons from Women in Red
[edit]Women in Red | April 2021, Volume 7, Issue 4, Numbers 184, 188, 194, 195, 196
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 20:15, 22 March 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
May 2021 at Women in Red
[edit]Women in Red | May 2021, Volume 7, Issue 5, Numbers 184, 188, 197, 198
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 21:35, 28 April 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
June 2021 at Women in Red
[edit]Women in Red | June 2021, Volume 7, Issue 6, Numbers 184, 188, 196, 199, 200, 201
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 18:49, 28 May 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
July 2021 at Women in Red
[edit]Women in Red | July 2021, Volume 7, Issue 7, Numbers 184, 188, 202, 203, 204, 205
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 16:04, 22 June 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
August Editathons at Women in Red
[edit]Women in Red | August 2021, Volume 7, Issue 8, Numbers 184, 188, 204, 205, 206, 207
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 22:24, 23 July 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
September 2021 at Women in Red
[edit]Women in Red | September 2021, Volume 7, Issue 9, Numbers 184, 188, 204, 205, 207, 208
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 22:29, 26 August 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
October 2021 at Women in Red
[edit]Women in Red | October 2021, Volume 7, Issue 10, Numbers 184, 188, 209, 210, 211
Special event:
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 01:34, 29 September 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
November 2021 at Women in Red
[edit]Women in Red | November 2021, Volume 7, Issue 11, Numbers 184, 188, 210, 212, 213
|
--Innisfree987 (talk) 21:27, 24 October 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Penny Ackery may well be moved to Draft:Penny Ackery by the time you read this
[edit]Hi DrPlantGenomics, and thank you for your contributions. As of 13 November 2021 it would appear that Ms Ackery does not meet the "WP:ANYBIO" and a number of other criteria, including but not limited to "WP:NPOL" for inclusion as a Wikipedia article. The 2022 Australian federal election is still a long way off, and - while Psephologists may disagree - nobody actually knows who will be the member for Hume will be until the AEC posts the result on its website. Pete AU aka --Shirt58 (talk) 10:38, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Fair point! Good to know. Thanks for letting me know.
November 2021
[edit]Your edit to Raina MacIntyre has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 15:52, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Nomination of Penny Ackery for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Penny Ackery, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.
The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Penny Ackery until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
Fair enough. DrPlantGenomoics
Milestone reached
[edit]1000th edit | |
Congratulations on your 1,000th edit! Oronsay (talk) 23:39, 24 November 2021 (UTC) |
Thanks so much Oronsay! DrPlantGenomics (talk)
December 2021 at Women in Red
[edit]Women in Red | December 2021, Volume 7, Issue 12, Numbers 184, 188, 210, 214, 215, 216
|
--Innisfree987 (talk) 00:10, 27 November 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in climate change 2021 participant |
January 2022 Women in Red
[edit]Happy New Year from Women in Red Jan 2022, Vol 8, Issue 1, Nos 214, 216, 217, 218, 219
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:02, 28 December 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Hello & Women in Climate
[edit]Hello DrPlantGenomics! I remembered today that you'd asked for a reminder from WIR about the Women in Climate focus for the year. I hope your year has begun well, looking forward to editing for a common cause! Lajmmoore (talk) 10:07, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
Katherine Woodthorpe
[edit]https://twitter.com/kwoodthorpe/status/1487532143722917892 FYI. --Tagishsimon (talk) 22:30, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
February with Women in Red
[edit] Women in Red Feb 2022, Vol 8, Issue 2, Nos 214, 217, 220, 221, 222
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 15:09, 31 January 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
March editathons
[edit]Women in Red Mar 2022, Vol 8, Issue 3, Nos 214, 217, 222, 223, 224, 225
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:37, 27 February 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
April Editathons from Women in Red
[edit]Women in Red Apr 2022, Vol 8, Issue 4, Nos 214, 217, 226, 227, 228
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 22:44, 22 March 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Disambiguation link notification for April 18
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Monique Ryan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page H index.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 18 April 2022 (UTC)
May Women in Red events
[edit]Women in Red May 2022, Vol 8, Issue 5, Nos 214, 217, 227, 229, 230
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:52, 30 April 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
June events from Women in Red
[edit]Women in Red June 2022, Vol 8, Issue 6, Nos 214, 217, 227, 231, 232, 233
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 09:19, 31 May 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red in July 2022
[edit]Women in Red July 2022, Vol 8, Issue 7, Nos 214, 217, 234, 235
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 15:45, 27 June 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
I have sent you a note about a page you started
[edit]Hello, DrPlantGenomics
Thank you for creating Catharyn Johanna Stern.
User:Kudpung, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Please add the appropriate Wikiproject banner to the talk page
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Kudpung}}
. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~
.
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 10:20, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
Women in Red in August 2022
[edit]Women in Red August 2022, Vol 8, Issue 8, Nos 214, 217, 236, 237, 238, 239
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 10:57, 29 July 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red in September 2022
[edit]Women in Red September 2022, Vol 8, Issue 9, Nos 214, 217, 240, 241
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 15:34, 31 August 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red October 2022
[edit]Women in Red October 2022, Vol 8, Issue 10, Nos 214, 217, 242, 243, 244
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 14:58, 29 September 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red November 2022
[edit]Women in Red November 2022, Vol 8, Issue 11, Nos 214, 217, 245, 246, 247
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 17:33, 26 October 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red December 2022
[edit]Women in Red December 2022, Vol 8, Issue 12, Nos 214, 217, 248, 249, 250
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 20:53, 26 November 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Women in Red January 2023
[edit]Happy New Year from Women in Red | January 2023, Volume 9, Issue 1, Nos 250, 251, 252, 253, 254
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 18:00, 27 December 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red in February 2023
[edit] Women in Red Feb 2023, Vol 9, Iss 2, Nos 251, 252, 255, 256, 257, 259
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 07:26, 30 January 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red March 2023
[edit] Women in Red Mar 2023, Vol 9, Iss 3, Nos 251, 252, 258, 259, 260, 261
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 12:52, 26 February 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red April 2023
[edit] Women in Red Apr 2023, Vol 9, Iss 4, Nos 251, 252, 262, 263, 264, 265, 266
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 07:51, 27 March 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red May 2023
[edit] Women in Red May 2023, Vol 9, Iss 5, Nos 251, 252, 267, 268, 269, 270
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 18:27, 27 April 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red - June 2023
[edit] Women in Red June 2023, Vol 9, Iss 6, Nos 251, 252, 271, 272, 273
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 09:15, 28 May 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red July 2023
[edit] Women in Red June 2023, Vol 9, Iss 7, Nos 251, 252, 274, 275, 276
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 07:43, 27 June 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red 8th Anniversary
[edit]Women in Red 8th Anniversary | |
In July 2015 around 15.5% of the English Wikipedia's biographies were about women. As of July 2023, 19.61% of the English Wikipedia's biographies are about women. That's a lot of biographies created in the effort to close the gender gap. Happy 8th Anniversary! Join us for some virtual cake and add comments or memories and please keep on editing to close the gap! |
--Lajmmoore (talk) 11:00, 18 July 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red August 2023
[edit] Women in Red August 2023, Vol 9, Iss 8, Nos 251, 252, 277, 278, 279, 280
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 19:24, 28 July 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
September 2023 at Women In Red
[edit] Women in Red September 2023, Vol 9, Iss 9, Nos 251, 252, 281, 282, 283
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Victuallers (talk) 16:49, 25 August 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red October 2023
[edit] Women in Red October 2023, Vol 9, Iss 10, Nos 251, 252, 284, 285, 286
See also
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 10:51, 29 September 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Disambiguation link notification for October 7
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mary Tindale, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Randwick.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:39, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
CS1 error on Jodi Matterson
[edit]Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Jodi Matterson, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
- A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 07:18, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Women in Red - November 2023
[edit] Women in Red November 2023, Vol 9, Iss 11, Nos 251, 252, 287, 288, 289
See also Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 08:22, 26 October 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Congratulations on your successes
[edit]In a recent press article, DrPlantGenomics, I have read about your many contributions to biographies of Australian women associated with STEM. You also appear to have played an important part in organizing the SuperStars event on 7 August. This list of your articles is impressive. It's good to have such an active contributor to Women in Red. Keep up the good work and let me know if ever you think I can help you along. Happy editing!--Ipigott (talk) 07:10, 28 October 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks so much, that means a lot. I appreciate your comments. :-) DrPlantGenomics (talk) 06:37, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
- --Ipigott(talk) - I'm curious - what makes the difference between a start page and a C class page? Thank you. DrPlantGenomics (talk) 10:55, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
I'm curious - what makes the difference between a Start and a C class article? Thank you. Ipigott (talk)
Authority control
[edit]Hi DrPlantGenomics, thanks for all your contributions to Wikipedia! Just to let you know that I changed one of your drafts to refer to the Wikidata item Cori Stewart (Q115611813). This is the preferred way of adding authority control identifiers to a draft article, as one day adding other parameters directly will not work. (You will have noticed the red error message on the article.) Please let me know if you have any questions, regards — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 08:34, 5 November 2023 (UTC)
- Any thoughts on the above? — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 09:16, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
- Thank you for your comment. I'm not exactly sure what this means. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DrPlantGenomics (talk • contribs)
- Hi again. I am suggesting that you add the Wikidata qid to the {{Authority control}} template on your new articles, (example) which will automatically pull the identifiers through — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 12:28, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- OK this looks great. Can you explain how I do this? Do I go to Wikidata and link the person's name on the Wikidata page? Thank you. I think I once learned how to do this a year or so ago but don't recall. DrPlantGenomics (talk) 22:45, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- If you can find the right item in Wikidata (search here) then copy the number at the top beginning with Q (e.g. Q115611813) and then add it as a parameter
|qid=Q115611813
to the authority control template — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 20:54, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- If you can find the right item in Wikidata (search here) then copy the number at the top beginning with Q (e.g. Q115611813) and then add it as a parameter
Women in Red December 2023
[edit] Women in Red December 2023, Vol 9, Iss 12, Nos 251, 252, 290, 291, 292
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 20:22, 27 November 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:57, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Anna Moore
[edit]Great work. Just reviewed. I created a Wikidata entry and also a redirect from the full name along with some general cleanup. Again, great work!!! CNMall41 (talk) 01:28, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
Women in Red January 2024
[edit]Women in Red | January 2024, Volume 10, Issue 1, Numbers 291, 293, 294, 295, 296
Announcement
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
Women in Red February 2024
[edit]Women in Red | February 2024, Volume 10, Issue 2, Numbers 293, 294, 297, 298
Announcement
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 20:08, 28 January 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red March 2024
[edit]Women in Red | March 2024, Volume 10, Issue 3, Numbers 293, 294, 299, 300, 301
Announcements
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 20:22, 25 February 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red April 2024
[edit]Women in Red | April 2024, Volume 10, Issue 4, Numbers 293, 294, 302, 303, 304
Announcements
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 19:41, 30 March 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
I have sent you a note about a page you started
[edit]Hello, DrPlantGenomics. Thank you for your work on Ailie Gallant. Broc, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Good start! The page reads too much like a resume, therefore I tagged it accordingly. Please make sure to add categories to the page as well.
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Broc}}
. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~
. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Broc (talk) 11:16, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
Women in Red May 2024
[edit]Women in Red | May 2024, Volume 10, Issue 5, Numbers 293, 294, 305, 306, 307
Announcements from other communities
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 06:16, 28 April 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red June 2024
[edit]Women in Red | June 2024, Volume 10, Issue 6, Numbers 293, 294, 308, 309, 310
Announcements from other communities
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 07:04, 23 May 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Your contributed article, Karen Livesey,
[edit]If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Karen Livesey,. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Karen Livesey. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Karen Livesey. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.
If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Liz Read! Talk! 05:22, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
Thank you Liz! That was absolutely a typo, I created the page with the comma first, and then to solve that, I created the correct one. I'm happy for someone to delete the wrong page. I managed a solution, which was to create the page without the comma, but this one needs deleting. I'm not at all discouraged, onwards and upwards!
May 2024
[edit]Your edit to Tiahni Adamson has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for information on how to contribute your work appropriately. For legal reasons, Wikipedia strictly cannot host copyrighted text or images from print media or digital platforms without an appropriate and verifiable license. Contributions infringing on copyright will be removed. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. Hi, I had to remove several chunks of the page which were copyright violations. As a result, the biography is now extremely short and perhaps worth expanding in your own words. Thanks for all the effort on the creation of new pages, but please be careful with copyright. Broc (talk) 08:39, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
Copyvios
[edit]Hi, I found the same copyright issues at Tara Pukala and Karen Livesey. Please be more careful in the future. Broc (talk) 08:48, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
- Please let me know which text you think is not sufficiently original enough and I will edit it. Thank you. Broc (talk) DrPlantGenomics (talk) 08:56, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
- I already removed it and requested CV-REVDEL on all three pages. Until an admin completes the revision deletion, you can still access the page history. Broc (talk) 08:59, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
- Since we're chatting already, I found some minor styling issues in your otherwise very well written pages. I would suggest using en-dashes instead of hyphens when needed per MOS:DASH, and to avoid the excessive use of caps (e.g.: "she is associate professor" instead of "she is Associate Professor") per MOS:CAPS. Broc (talk) 09:06, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
- I already removed it and requested CV-REVDEL on all three pages. Until an admin completes the revision deletion, you can still access the page history. Broc (talk) 08:59, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
Regarding your last edit on Tiahni Adamson ([2]), I find the copyright issue to still be present. You should avoid close paraphrasing. In this case, you just changed a few supporting words in the sentence but you can still recognize it is a copy of the original source by the use of refined expressions such as "inaugural cohort". I would suggest reading the source and then rewriting it entirely in your own words. In this case, for instance, you could use "first intake", "initial group", "opening class"... Broc (talk) 09:13, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
- And just to be clear, this is not meant to discourage you in any way. I think you're doing a great job with the creation of pages and just wanted to point out some copyright issues which seem to be recurring in many of your articles. Broc (talk) 09:15, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
CCI Notice
[edit]Hello, DrPlantGenomics. This message is being sent to inform you that a request for a contributor copyright investigation has been filed at Contributor copyright investigations concerning your contributions to Wikipedia in relation to Wikipedia's copyrights policy. The listing can be found here. Thank you. Broc (talk) 13:10, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
CS1 error on Anne Kavanagh
[edit]Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Anne Kavanagh, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
- A bare URL and missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 06:57, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
CS1 error on Anne Kavanagh
[edit]Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Anne Kavanagh, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
- A bare URL and missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 06:58, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
Women in Red July 2024
[edit]Women in Red | July 2024, Volume 10, Issue 7, Numbers 293, 294, 311, 312, 313
Announcements from other communities
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 14:27, 30 June 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Heather Cooper is back on PROD
[edit]I didn't know if you knew. Thanks! Geekdiva (talk) 23:34, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you (talk)- I added some more secondary refs. Do you want to have a look and see what you think? DrPlantGenomics (talk) 02:09, 13 July 2024 (UTC)
Sandbox pages
[edit]Just a reminder that user sandbox pages aren't allowed to be filed in mainspace categories, per WP:USERNOCAT. It seems every time you update one of your sandbox pages to work on a new topic, it's back in categories again, but sandboxes can't be in categories. You can put categories on the page in disabled form if you wish, such as wrapped in the {{draft categories}} template or with a leading colon in front of the word Category (e.g. [[:Category:Bla bla]]) so that it turns into a text link to the category instead of filing the page in the category, and then undisable them after you've moved the content into a real article, or alternatively you can just leave categories off the page entirely and add them only when you're moving the content, but the page can't actually be filed in categories while it's still in your sandbox. Thanks. Bearcat (talk) 16:24, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
Hi, interesting. I've just checked sandbox 6, 7, 8, and 9 and none have categories in them. As examples, see the attached. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:DrPlantGenomics/sandbox6
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:DrPlantGenomics/sandbox7
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:DrPlantGenomics/sandbox8
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:DrPlantGenomics/sandbox9.
DrPlantGenomics (talk) 00:23, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
- If you look at this version of sandbox 8 for instance, you will see that you had added categories to it. In the next edit, @Bearcat removed them so that your sandbox did not appear in those categories. Oronsay (talk) 01:12, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
- i.e. Add categories to the article after you have moved it to mainspace, please. Oronsay (talk) 01:13, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you Oronsay! I have now saved them in my word document template. DrPlantGenomics (talk) 03:58, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
- i.e. Add categories to the article after you have moved it to mainspace, please. Oronsay (talk) 01:13, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
- As noted by Oronsay, those are all currently not in categories because I removed them from the categories that you previously added them to. If you check their edit histories, on each page you'll find two, three or four instances of me editing them with the edit summary "WP:USERNOCAT", which is me removing categories that you added in a prior edit. Bearcat (talk) 01:15, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you, that is useful feedback. DrPlantGenomics (talk) 03:59, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
Women in Red August 2024
[edit]Women in Red | August 2024, Volume 10, Issue 8, Numbers 293, 294, 311, 313, 314, 315
Announcements from other communities
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 19:56, 25 July 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
September 2024 at Women in Red
[edit]Women in Red | September 2024, Volume 10, Issue 9, Numbers 293, 294, 311, 316, 317
Online events:
Announcements from other communities
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 18:56, 26 August 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red October 2024
[edit]Women in Red | October 2024, Volume 10, Issue 10, Numbers 293, 294, 318, 319, 320
Online events:
Announcements from other communities
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 08:04, 29 September 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red November 2024
[edit]Women in Red | November 2024, Vol 10, Issue 11, Nos 293, 294, 321, 322, 323
Online events:
Announcements from other communities
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 20:45, 29 October 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:42, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
Women in Red December 2024
[edit]Women in Red | December 2024, Vol 10, Issue 12, Nos 293, 294, 324, 325
Online events:
Announcements from other communities
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 18:44, 29 November 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging