User talk:Donutcity

Recent edits to Null-subject language

I wanted to write that I disagree with your recent edits to Null-subject language, which 1) removed the content of the previous Literal Translation and renamed the previous Actual Translation to Literal Translation in the examples for the Latin language; and 2) removed the parentheses around the pronouns within the English translation in the examples for the Spanish language.

(1) I believe that your edit goes against the point of the Examples section, which is to illustrate how the null subject appears in these languages. The intermediate step – whatever it may be called (I'm not a linguist) – is necessary for the example to have substantial value. I advocate putting the intermediate step back into the examples. I do think the intermediate step could be called Literal translation, judging by the description of the term in the linked article.

(2) I think an alternative to your edit would be to use square brackets (i.e. []) around the pronoun. This preserves the fact that the pronouns were not used in the original language, while keeping the sentences understandable in English and mirroring the parentheses from the Spanish text. As the linked article indicates, square brackets are commonly used to "enclose explanatory or missing material"; I see the value in using them here.

Please let me know your thoughts! ~David Rolek ^(talk) 06:06, 7 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Latin and Spanish are not null-subject languages, their inclusion in this article is erroneous. Latin and Spanish are overt-pronoun languages. In Spanish, both 'estoy' and 'yo estoy' mean 'i am,' but both 'estan' and 'ustedes estan' mean 'they are.' the subject is contained within the conjugated verb (-oy, -an, etc), so it is not null-subject. using the separate pronoun word is optional, so it can be considered a pro-drop (pronoun dropping) language in which null-pronouns occur. the pronoun can be omitted becuz the subject is evident in the finite tense verb. Donutcity (talk)

Reference Errors on 2 February

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Los Angeles Galaxy page, your edit caused an unnamed parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:28, 3 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

May 2014

Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Toronto FC, but we cannot accept original research. Original research also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Johnny Au _{(talk/contributions)} 02:00, 11 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Original research? My -minor- change was deleted (totally fine by me), and the deleater left a long haughty comment, now I get one from you too! Is Jimmy Wales going to message me next? Donutcity (talk)

August 2014

Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Tim Hortons Field, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. 117Avenue (talk) 02:23, 10 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

September 2014

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at USL Pro. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. Bmf 051 (talk) 01:29, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

definitely not minor

Hello Donutcity. I was reviewing some material and happened upon some of your edits. I noticed that you had marked the edits as "minor" edits, but in fact, they are not. Don't undervalue the importance of your own edits by marking them as minor. Per the policy named WP:MINOR the minor edit checkbox should only be marked if the edit meets certain criteria, such as fixing a citation, copyedit (with no change to the meaning intended) fixing vandalism, etc. Adding or removing even one word can change an edit from a minor edit to one that should not be marked as minor, even if the total impact on the article is "minor" within common usage of the term. Good luck. Etamni | ✉ | ✓ 08:52, 29 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the positive feedback Etamni, i really appreciate it. Donutcity (talk) 00:16, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Neutral Nation, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Huron. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:05, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

2015–16 CONCACAF Champions League

If you read my edit note it says, Everywhere else in the article the full name is used. I have no problem using the short name but it should be the same throughout the whole article. So before you go bringing up an entire nations preference that you know everything about...maybe you should actually edit the whole article not just one instance you happen across. I was simply reversing sloppy editing, had nothing to do with the content of the edit. It looks really stupid if the name of a team is shown multiple ways in one article. Chris1834 Talk 02:38, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:26, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Donutcity. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Donutcity. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

December 2017

Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. Kendall-K1 (talk) 22:47, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Donutcity. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Donutcity. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

September 2019

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at List of New York Yankees no-hitters. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. – Muboshgu (talk) 23:10, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It appears that you are the only person who feels disrupted by this edit, and that your removal of it appears to be driven by personal connection to the article. The edit is unique and interesting information, completely relevant to the subject. You have offered no reasoning or constructive criticism, only your opinion that it is trivial and disruptive. Donutcity (talk) 23:29, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

that

On February 22, you went on a rampage against the word which in List of enclaves and exclaves. You gave the edit summary "grammar". I understand how in some cases you prefer restrictive that to nonrestrictive which. But by also removing "of which" (from "some of which" and the like) you changed a bunch of good sentences into comma splices. —Tamfang (talk) 20:23, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Which is often misused, but thanks for pointing out the comma splices. Donutcity (talk) 01:38, 7 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:13, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:30, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:11, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop piping FC Cincinnati and Nashville SC

When we write about MLS teams where the name of the team is "FC City" or "City SC", we always write out the full name. The rest that you are piping are fine, but please stop piping these two. Jay eyem (talk) 23:26, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's superfluous to keep the FC/SC when no other country does that. Donutcity (talk) 23:29, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Mexican clubs don't keep the FC/CF. Look at Pachuca, Toluca, Monterrey, etc. People figure it out. Donutcity (talk) 23:31, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It doesn't matter what other countries do. When discussing MLS teams where they use that name format, we always write the full name. Please gain consensus before making such a change again. Jay eyem (talk) 23:34, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If I recall correctly, I think the reason this became the consensus is because of WP:BRANDING. It was decided that this is how MLS teams are referred to most commonly in independent reliable sources, while the same is not true for other countries. That is, Arsenal is not usually referred to as "Arsenal F.C." outside Wikipedia, but Toronto FC is usually rendered as such. Feel free to challenge that, but it is the current consensus. Bmf 051 (talk) 00:33, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the background and input. The WP:Branding doesn't explicitly mention team naming conventions, but i get the gist of it: don't assume the reader will know. However, in articles about football clubs playing in club football competitions, readers will deduce that Monterrey, Pachuca, *Cincinnati* and *Nashville* are all football clubs; they won't see the US city names alone and suddenly think the municipality itself has entered the tournament. The insistence on emphasizing the FC/SC on clubs names is unique to US football culture, but it's used inconsistently even in US circles; this article is continental in scope. Donutcity (talk) 14:25, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]