Jump to content

User talk:Dolfrog/Archives/2013 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Merging SID into SPD

Hi, I have proposed that the article Sensory integration dysfunction be merged into an article on SPD that you have been involved in editing. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going to the Talk page for Sensory processing disorder (click this link to go there), and adding your comments on that discussion page. Thank you. Popsup (talk) 20:30, 19 February 2013 (UTC)

about apduk interest

Dear Graeme, we've spoken from time to time. As you know I am keen to continue CAPD information sharing. Please let me chat with you about continuing this project. Rosalie Seymour. ncm4kids@gmail.com81.152.101.249 (talk) 19:45, 20 May 2013 (UTC)

Hi Rosalie, Good to talk earlier today, the Dyslexia Symposium link is http://www.oxfordkobe.com/program.html dolfrog (talk) 13:47, 21 May 2013 (UTC)

June 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Aphasia may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 23:05, 7 June 2013 (UTC)

CiteULike

While this may be a useful source for editors do not really consider it appropriate for the article space. Started discussion here at WT:MED. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 02:44, 3 July 2013 (UTC)

Consensus against these links are here [1] Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 12:56, 3 July 2013 (UTC)
Hum so this appears to be collections of papers you have selected yourself that you are attempting to push into Wikipedia against policy. I do not consider this appropriate. 4 other editors have now weighed against the inclusion. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 13:27, 3 July 2013 (UTC)

wb

You have new message/s Hello. You have a new message at Rjanag's talk page.

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Irlen filters, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Depression (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:42, 7 July 2013 (UTC)

thanks for your help with Irlen filters & syndrome

A tricky topic requiring careful documentation. Leadwind (talk) 16:11, 7 July 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Dolfrog/Cortical visual impairment (CVI)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. dolfrog (talk) 01:50, 13 July 2013 (UTC)

User discussion moved

Just wanted to let you know that I moved a user-specific discussion from WT:MED to their user Talk page, the latter being more appropriate for such behavioral discussions. -- Scray (talk) 05:18, 21 July 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Developmental coordination disorder, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Crawling (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:17, 30 July 2013 (UTC)

Developmental coordination disorder

I couldn't help but notice your changes to Developmental Dyspraxia article including the name change to "Developmental Coordination Disorder" that seems to have been done with no discussion, might I ask why you decided not to go the full hog and use "Clumsy Child Syndrome" if you wanted to use pathologising language not commonly accepted by dyspraxics?86.183.9.199 (talk) 23:14, 3 August 2013 (UTC)

The article needs more medical citations from medical research, which as the citations included in the introduction now use the more practical name of Developmental Coordination Disorder to describe the condition, to describe the issues involved relate to the various sometimes co-morbid conditions. There is a redirect on the Developmental dyspraxia page to the Developmental Coordination Disorder article. These conditions change their name as research progresses and improves the understanding of the issues, as you have observed in the first name "Clumsy Child Syndrome" Hopefully you could become a member of Wikipedia and have your own talk page. dolfrog (talk) 12:28, 4 August 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Fetal alcohol spectrum disorder, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Integration (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:26, 6 August 2013 (UTC)

Can you help?

i'm terribly sorry for the mistakes i am likely to make in my first attempt at joining a talk page. (long-time reader, first-time contributer, etc.) i merely wanted to bring up usage of words like "normal" verses "typical" when it comes to discussing stigmatized medical conditions and disabilities. (uh, sorry for randomly addressing this at a specific stranger, who is not my intended target. i just couldn't figure out how to do ANYTHING, so i chose the post with the most recent date.)

anyway, i have frequently seen the word "typical" become more standard in the medical community, as opposed to "normal", because it has fewer judgmental associations or implications. i am not feeling up-to-par in terms of expertise or any clear decision to edit this page, and understand that the apa has recently reclassified many diagnoses associated with types of autism in the latest dsm. am not yet well-informed enough, however, about specifics, to make an unassisted judgment call on how to address the frequent use of the deprecated term "normal" throughout this article.

thank you to anyone who is willing to help a newcomer address this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Howdoiwiki (talk • contribs) 12:47, 19 September 2013 (UTC)

I will help if I can, do you want to have a Wikipedia user account, so that you can have your own user and talk pages, (like this one) so that you can make contact with other regular Wikipedia editors. I am still making mistakes and learning from others. And I also prefer "typical" to "normal" as you described. If you have any questions do not hesitate to ask, but I can not be sure to always have an answer dolfrog (talk) 13:07, 19 September 2013 (UTC)

Books and Bytes: The Wikipedia Library Newsletter

Books and Bytes

Volume 1, Issue 1, October 2013

by The Interior (talk · contribs), Ocaasi (talk · contribs)

Greetings Wikipedia Library members! Welcome to the inaugural edition of Books and Bytes, TWL’s monthly newsletter. We're sending you the first edition of this opt-in newsletter, because you signed up, or applied for a free research account: HighBeam, Credo, Questia, JSTOR, or Cochrane. To receive future updates of Books and Bytes, please add your name to the subscriber's list. There's lots of news this month for the Wikipedia Library, including new accounts, upcoming events, and new ways to get involved...

New positions: Sign up to be a Wikipedia Visiting Scholar, or a Volunteer Wikipedia Librarian

Wikipedia Loves Libraries: Off to a roaring start this fall in the United States: 29 events are planned or have been hosted.

New subscription donations: Cochrane round 2; HighBeam round 8; Questia round 4... Can we partner with NY Times and Lexis-Nexis??

New ideas: OCLC innovations in the works; VisualEditor Reference Dialog Workshop; a photo contest idea emerges

News from the library world: Wikipedian joins the National Archives full time; the Getty Museum releases 4,500 images; CERN goes CC-BY

Announcing WikiProject Open: WikiProject Open kicked off in October, with several brainstorming and co-working sessions

New ways to get involved: Visiting scholar requirements; subject guides; room for library expansion and exploration

Read the full newsletter


Thanks for reading! All future newsletters will be opt-in only. Have an item for the next issue? Leave a note for the editor on the Suggestions page. --The Interior 20:09, 27 October 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Developmental verbal dyspraxia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Prosody (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:11, 30 October 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Child development, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Genetic, Pragmatic and Maturation (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 20:04, 1 November 2013 (UTC)

A Dobos torte for you!

7&6=thirteen (☎) has given you a Dobos Torte to enjoy! Seven layers of fun because you deserve it.


To give a Dobos Torte and spread the WikiLove, just place {{subst:Dobos Torte}} on someone else's talkpage, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.

7&6=thirteen (☎) 12:58, 10 November 2013 (UTC)

November 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of MeSH codes (F03) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • * {{MeshNumber|F03.087.300|Consciousness+Disorders}} --- [[consciousness disorders]

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 23:42, 13 November 2013 (UTC)

Agraphia

The Bio-star
For Dolfrog, in recognition of your excellent work in bringing agraphia from a stub to a fairly well developed article. You are one of those unsung heroes of Wikipedia-- always on my radar, but never getting the thanks you deserve. So thanks, you are noticed and appreciated !!! SandyGeorgia (Talk) 18:52, 19 November 2013 (UTC)


PS, see discussion of the course at WP:ENB. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 18:52, 19 November 2013 (UTC)

EFMR

See page move discussion at Talk:Epilepsy in females with intellectual disability. Good intentions but wrong result. We've not got a syndrome name that only appears on Wikipedia. -- Colin°Talk 21:19, 22 November 2013 (UTC)

Epilepsy and intellectual disability are two seperate issues, this Epilepsy in females with intellectual disability refers to co-morbid epilepsy and intellectual disability; so if one name is changed independently then then there is a need for any comorbid name to change as well. dolfrog (talk) 21:38, 22 November 2013 (UTC)
There seems to be a US or North American preference to continue using th term "mental retardation" which seems to reflect a USA skew/bias on Wikipedia in general dolfrog (talk) 21:58, 22 November 2013 (UTC)
You are applying rules governing sentences we write with rules governing the naming of things. We can reword phrases and sentences. We can't rename things. This article title is a name, not a phrase. Colin°Talk 23:16, 22 November 2013 (UTC)
unfortunately you seem to live in the past, and not realised that the name has changed, this seems to be a problem with many academics, time for you and others to catch up dolfrog (talk) 13:40, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
I think you have the best of intentions. I sure wish it had a different name. It doesn't. Colin°Talk 23:05, 23 November 2013 (UTC)

If they name has changed provide a ref. If you cannot do not change the naming of the article. We do not invent new names for disease here. We simply reflect sources. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 22:48, 23 November 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Dolfrog/Agraphia

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. dolfrog (talk) 18:36, 30 November 2013 (UTC)

Phonological development page

Hi Dolfrog,

I changed one line in the "Phonological development" article. It cites an article which indicates that infants respond differently to their own name at 6 months than they do to stress-matched foils (e.g. Jimmy prefers "Jimmy! Jimmy" over "Mikey! Mikey" while Mikey exhibits the opposite preference). The following sentence is the problem. It say this indicates that infants have associated their name with themselves. This does not follow from the Mandel et al. finding. It is entirely possible, and actually in my opinion somewhat likely, that they are merely responding to their own name because it is more frequent in their input. The Mandel finding is consistent with both possibilities. Therefore it does *not* indicate that infants have associated their names with the meaning "me"; this is a logical error which renders the sentence literally false. The sentence can be made true by pointing out both interpretations, or hedging in some way ("It is not known at this time whether infants also know that their name refers to themselves; they could be simply responding to their name because it is more frequent in their input.") Somewhat less desirably, the second sentence could be deleted entirely (since it would require a citation and as far as I know, none exists; it is extremely difficult to design tests which reliably determine whether infants know the meaning of pronouns and anaphors).

I do not know why you have reverted the edit, although I do see that according to the editorial policy this does not count as a minor edit.

best --R

Rtd885 (talk) 14:40, 2 December 2013 (UTC)

Marketing / Studies

Are all studies posted on the Scientific Learning page considered marketing? Should we remove all? How is it determined which research is "marketing" and which research is "research"? I thought publication in a peer-reviewed journal was considered appropriate but I am new to wikipedia so please help me understand. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Healthwellsoarreach (talk • contribs) 20:58, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Library Survey

As a subscriber to one of The Wikipedia Library's programs, we'd like to hear your thoughts about future donations and project activities in this brief survey. Thanks and cheers, Ocaasi t | c 14:55, 9 December 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited FOXP2 and human evolution, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Vocalisation and Ultrasonic (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 13 December 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Speech science, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pharyngeal (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 20 December 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Auditory system (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Cortex and Tectorial membrane
Olivocochlear system (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Hyperpolarization

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:54, 27 December 2013 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Dolfrog/Archives/2013_1&oldid=1139728817"