User talk:Digitalphilologist

Welcome!

Hi Digitalphilologist! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! Shirt58 (talk) 10:32, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Numenius of Heraclea moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Numenius of Heraclea, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Gpkp [u • t • c] 16:41, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Leonides of Elis for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Leonides of Elis is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leonides of Elis until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Modussiccandi (talk) 11:01, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Aemilianus of Mauretania moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Aemilianus of Mauretania, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Roller26 (talk) 19:25, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Plutarch of Alexandria moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Plutarch of Alexandria, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Roller26 (talk) 19:27, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent articles on people in Athenaeus

Hello Digitalphilologist, it's nice to see a new user interested in the classical world. You'll have seen that some of your articles on people in Athenaeus were removed from the mainspace. There is currently a discussion going on as to how these articles might remain published in the future (see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leonides of Elis). I would be grateful if you could let us know what you think. Best, Modussiccandi (talk) 19:58, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for creating Characters of the Deipnosophistae. I'd recommend that you flesh out the entries for individual characters, ideally with precise references to secondary sources. Primary sources can occasionally be used, but generally most of the information on here should come from secondary sources. Best, Modussiccandi (talk) 11:18, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Advice

I've kept an eye on Characters of the Deipnosophistae. Here's a small tip that will prevent the page's reference section from getting too long: you should consider establishing Baldwin (1977) as a bibliographical entry and then refer to it with "Author (date) page number" only. If you're not sure how to do this, have a look at G. E. L. Owen, a page I recently brought to Good Article status. Best, Modussiccandi (talk) 12:10, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Y Thank you for helping me. Digitalphilologist (talk) 14:01, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Characters of the Deipnosophistae, again

Hi Digitalphilologist, it's me again. I've seen that you removed the content that was merged from Leonides of Elis form the Characters of the Deipnosophistae article. May I ask why you did this? I thought the content added something to the article. In fact, I think each of the characters should be described in more detail than is currently the case. You see, Wikipedia is not a directory of names in ancient literature and, unless you provide more than the characters' names and occupations, I'm not sure this article needs to exist in its current form. Best, Modussiccandi (talk) 16:15, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I edited it because it was necessary to uniform the content (citation style etc.) to the content of the other characters of the new article. The information is the same and this is the reason why we decided to delete the old article and create a new one with the other characters of the Deipnosophists. The article needs to exist and is going to be expanded with more information.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Numenius of Heraclea has been accepted

Numenius of Heraclea, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Cerebellum (talk) 19:08, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Cerebellum! Thank you very much! I will keep editing! Digitalphilologist (talk)

Concern regarding Draft:Aemilianus of Mauretania

Hello, Digitalphilologist. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Aemilianus of Mauretania, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:02, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Plutarch of Alexandria

Hello, Digitalphilologist. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Plutarch of Alexandria, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:02, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Aemilianus of Mauretania

Hello, Digitalphilologist. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Aemilianus of Mauretania".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:45, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Plutarch of Alexandria

Hello, Digitalphilologist. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Plutarch of Alexandria".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:46, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Characters of the Deipnosophistae for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Characters of the Deipnosophistae is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Characters of the Deipnosophistae until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Jontesta (talk) 01:44, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I see that the article has been deleted and only very few pieces of information have been inserted into Deipnosophistae#Characters. I think that names in ancient Greek and references to ancient sources should be preserved. I agreed on the deletion of the independent article, but not on the complete removal of what was written. Digitalphilologist (talk) 17:50, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]