User talk:Deen maxwell

February 2012

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Pyrgi Tablets, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "{{helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Pyrgi Tablets was changed by Deen maxwell (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.95444 on 2012-02-06T00:45:38+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 00:45, 6 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

Hello, Deen maxwell, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your edits to the page Liber Linteus have not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may be removed if they have not yet been. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. As well, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Haploidavey (talk) 20:12, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your editing at Liber Linteus (and elsewhere)

I added the welcome message above because you seemed unfamiliar with Wikipedia's editing policies. Please read those policies before making further edits, and note in particular:

Where content is disputed, talk-page discussion is essential, because the content of articles is decided by editorial consensus. Such discussions must be backed by reliable, peer-reviewed scholarly sources. Article content should reflect the scholarly consensus among those sources, even if you personally think those sources are wrong. Please don't restore the material without editorial consensus for the change.

Please read our policies on encyclopedic content, sourcing, and citations.

The blog you cite is not a significant scholarly source, its author appears to have no scholarly standing in this field of study, and his opinion is not cited by reliable scholarly sources.

As far as I can tell, none of your edits has been minor. Please don't mark them as such. Instead, you should enter a description of your edits in the edit summary box. If for some reason the "minor edit" box has been checked, please uncheck it.

If you need to discuss general editing issues, please get in touch here or on my talk-page. If you wish to discuss specific editing issues at particular articles, please do so at the relevant article talk-page. Thank you. Haploidavey (talk) 22:48, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Deen maxwell and welcome to Wikipedia. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia. Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please remember to disclose these connections. Haploidavey (talk) 23:55, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You are suspected of sockpuppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Deen maxwell. Thank you. Haploidavey (talk) 00:32, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not continue to add the same stuff to the articles, or you may be WP:blocked for edit warring. — kwami (talk) 00:33, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Deen maxwell, you've acknowledged that this is your main and preferred account. As you intend using only your named account, I've copied and pasted the following from my talk-page:

(quote) Well you accuse me of vandalising the Liber Linteus , well the interpretation of the Etruscan text is the biggest load of garbage you could pour on the public.The reason I might be coluding with a second party is when I opened my account with WIKI I made a mistake and entered my e-mail address as my used name, so I had to do it again with the correct user name so it may seem there are two accounts,keep my Deen Maxwell account and delete the other.

My primary interest is in the Etruscan Language which I have been studying for the last 30 years and I dont have the time to transcribe the Encyclopaedia Britannica to your site,although I enjoy using the site.And also you have a log in on the page but not a Log Out (58.111.89.246 (talk)).(58.111.89.246 (talk) 09:49, 11 February 2012 (UTC)). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.111.89.246 (talk) 09:44, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think I've accused you of vandalism anywhere at all - but if I have, please accept my apologies. Thanks for explaining your inadvertent use of multiple accounts. They're allowed under certain, very limited circumstances. Single accounts are better for continuity, accountability, trust and stability - they help foster and maintain a transparent, open editing environment. This matters particularly when article content and best-editing practice are in dispute. You've evidently made an honest mistake, due to your unfamiliarity with the relevant Wikipedia policies.

Your IP account won't be deleted, as its history is relevant to editing on other pages. You can and should open your IP user-page, using your named account, and enter a brief explanatory text, such as "This is an alternative account of [your named account signature - add four tildes (~) to sign automatically]". Copy the same to the IP talk-page. Then just don't use it. I can't know why you're having problems logging in or out; just remember to always log in using your named account before you edit. As far as I know, any browser can be set to remember your Wikipedia user-name and password.

For the rest, please carefully read my welcome message and other comments at your talk-page, particularly those relating to reliable scholarly sources. Like it or not (and sometimes I don't) personal background, expertise, authority and conviction matter not one bit to Wikipedia. And no-one expects or wants an article based on the Encyclopedia Brittanica. We're an encyclopedia in our own right. Haploidavey (talk) 12:44, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]