User talk:Davidng913

Gallery for 3985?

Could you make a gallery for UP 3985, just so it has one like 4014 and 844? I would do it, but the 3985 page is protected where only “official users” can edit it. 23.169.64.51 (talk) 19:06, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Currently, 3985's Commons page does not have a lot of good photos that can be used for it. In the future, once it is restored to service and good pictures appear, I will happily make a gallery. The page is currently protected as a result of vandalism that occurred during its period of retirement. Davidng913 (talk) 19:34, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, fair enough. Also, could you start a page for Mount Emily Company Shay #1, and then I could fill it up with info about it? The Oregon Rail Heritage Foundation owns it now, and since the Foundation's original 3 trio each have their own page, I think it's somewhat fair that Shay #1 should also have a page of it's own. I just finished filling up the page about Polson Logging #2, a Visiting engine of the ORHF. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 23.169.64.51 (talk) 22:06, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Because I don't have knowledge for this locomotive, you will need to ask someone else to create a page for it. Davidng913 (talk) 01:00, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please use edit summaries more often

When you make a series of edits with no edit summaries, like these, it's much more difficult for other editors to understand what it is you changed. If you had simply taken the 5 seconds to type out "changed photo" and "added link", I and other editors with the article on our watchlists can quickly see what you did and spend much less time checking edits. You're an experienced editor I see editing fairly often so I generally trust your edits, but please make more of an effort to use edit summaries. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 14:26, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Understood. I often publish too fast before I think so I apologize for this in advance. Davidng913 (talk) 14:33, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

March 2023

I hate to bother you, but I need some input from someone. I recently remade CNW 1385’s page from scratch, but right now I’m debating over whether or not I should get rid of this photo.

[1] This has been put in categories for the Strasburg Rail Road, but that doesn’t hold up, as sources I’ve recently found state that the wheels were sent directly to the more remote SPEC Machine. It gives me the feeling these aren’t even 1385’s wheels, but I wanted to hear someone else’s thoughts before I do anything about it. Someone who likes train writing (talk) 23:51, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

May need to look at more photos of the 1385 itself and see if the drivers look identical. Chances are, if they're not of the 1385, whoever uploaded the image had no idea which wheels those belong to and probably slapped a random locomotive onto the file. That's my opinion. Do feel free to ask other people about it. Thanks for reaching out! Davidng913 (talk) 23:57, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, not a problem. I just want to be sure. Someone who likes train writing (talk) 00:05, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Okay false alarm. It turns out I just found a source that outright said No. 1385's driving wheels were sent to Strasburg. So there's that. Someone who likes train writing (talk) 06:59, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:WMATA 8000 Series Exterior Rendering.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:WMATA 8000 Series Exterior Rendering.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:37, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Avelia Horizon.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Avelia Horizon.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stylez995 (talk) 19:01, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on National Airlines Flight 102

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page National Airlines Flight 102, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 15:31, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:46, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Union Pacific Railroad

Hi, I'm reaching out on updates to Union Pacific Railroad ; I posted an updated roster to the Talk page, but it hasn't seem to go anywhere. Would love to work with someone to clean up the page. MJ UnionPacific (talk) 18:01, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@MJ UnionPacific: I will work on it ASAP. Davidng913 (talk) 19:28, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Great! I'd love to work with you on this. MJ UnionPacific (talk) 19:59, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:37, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

R179 (New York City Subway car) description and features

Can you edit this page just the M train on it since the R179 is running on the M line on the regular schedule permanently I can't edit this page because is protected only auto confirmed username can edit.

Put the M on between the J and Z because is based assigned on the East New York Yard.

Look this sentences is missing now –

The R179s are numbered 3010–3327. Cars numbered 3010–3049 and 3238–3327 are configured into five-car sets, comprising 130 cars, which are assigned to the A and Rockaway Park Shuttle and are based out of Pitkin Yard. Cars numbered 3050–3237 are configured into four-car sets, comprising 188 cars; these are split between the J and Z (based out of East New York Yard) and the C (based out of 207th Street Yard). The order replaced all remaining R32s and R42s, which dated to the 1960s and early 1970s.^[1]^: 11 The R179s were also the last subway car order to be built by Bombardier Transportation prior to being acquired by Alstom in January 2021.^[2] 148.76.246.47 (talk) 22:15, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'll get to it when I get the chance. Thanks. Davidng913 (talk) 23:26, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

^ Cite error: The named reference MTA-CPOC-Jan2021 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
^ "A transformational step for Alstom: Completion of the acquisition of Bombardier Transportation". Archived from the original on February 22, 2021. Retrieved November 5, 2022.

[MTA-CPOC-Jan2021-1] Cite error: The named reference MTA-CPOC-Jan2021 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).

[2] "A transformational step for Alstom: Completion of the acquisition of Bombardier Transportation". Archived from the original on February 22, 2021. Retrieved November 5, 2022.

[1]

[2]