User talk:David Souther

Welcome!

Hello, David Souther, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --so U m y a S ch 14:26, 29 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

thanku david souther for ur valuale correction of the article ashoka the great. Divinstephen1 (talk) 05:51, 19 March 2009 (UTC)divinstephen[reply]

hello dear freind, david, pardon me for a late and rather cold response, i will be pleased to work with u , it will be my fortune to work with u , let me first salute ur awasome spirit .friend first, all our friends like yellomonkey and jeggard 85, jay and divinestephen1 and (...many other)had toiled their best to compose the article on one of the greatest human souls _ ashoka the great.i have some knowledge about this great emperor because i am a history student and like my father i had a little but valuable collection of books about emperor ashoka.therefore i know him a little bit.i am now searching some books which will tell more about ashokan epigraphs /edicts so i am adding in to the main article.but revivalization must be for beautifying the article so the soul/ plot of the article must not be polluted by that prosess. we (wikipedians) have to keep in mind that thing rather we have to be very carefull about it.again thanks for ur hardworkings and brave courage to evaluate this article , so best of luck u dear friend.i am with u go ahead do our duty for welfare of entire human beings. we all have to guide each other for evaluation and revival of this interesting article. hey i know i have a poor tounge in english but my thoughts are not poor.i will help my any possible help.so..keep it up...long live wikipedia. and wikipedians.yours faithfully, Chakrashok (talk) 05:15, 20 March 2009 (UTC)chakrashok[reply]

Edicts of Ashoka, Ashokavadana, Mahavamsa, and Dipavamsa must be summarized on main article page

1)hi (namaskara) david ji how r u my brother / friend, the credit of revaluation of article ashoka goes to u dear.i think ashok will be a featured article soon, also thanks to rajvaddhan and many other . but i think there should be a short summary of Edicts of Ashoka, Ashokavadana, Mahavamsa, and Dipavamsa in the content of historical refrerences , so it will help the readers and scholars who are studing on ashoka and old indian / asian studies. so i appeal u to contruct a genral short summary of Edicts of Ashoka, Ashokavadana, Mahavamsa, and Dipavamsa . i will help u when u need sir.i know there is see also part but the main page will help to readers and scholars . so keep it up.i will help u when u need friend.u may also read Edicts of Ashoka, Ashokavadana, Mahavamsa, and Dipavamsa from wikipedia and other sites from internet.i think the puzzling article is now a forecoming featured article because of u friend, so i think u do a prophetic work 2)Madhav Kondvilkar Monologue was the soul of the article , so will give u original marathi language quote , next time from original work so .will u add it in in Buddhist Conversion content. so work on this i will help u sir davidji long live wikipedia and wikipedians Chakrashok (talk) 12:26, 29 March 2009 (UTC)Chakrashok (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 12:19, 29 March 2009 (UTC).[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of My Fight

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

A tag has been placed on My Fight requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Battleaxe9872 ^Talk 22:50, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Notification: changes to "Mark my edits as minor by default" preference

Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.

On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was true. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to false in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and you will still be able to manually mark your edits as being 'minor'. The only thing that's changed is that you will no longer have them marked as minor by default.

For established users such as yourself there is a workaround available involving custom JavaScript. If you are familiar with the contents of WP:MINOR, and believe that it is still beneficial to the encyclopedia to have all your edits marked as such by default, then this discussion will give you the details you need to continue with this functionality indefinitely. If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.

Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 16:59, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]