User talk:Daver68
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of CIRI Human Rights Data Project, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://ciri.binghamton.edu. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.
This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 01:19, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
Re: Re: CIRI Human Rights Data Project
[edit]Hi -- I think the rest of WIKI would read better for folks with these breaks, rather than having text shoved so closely together. It is a trend these days to add a little more space at the end of paragraphs in written communications for increased readibility. Thus, notwithstanding an improbably huge public backlash against the most minor of formatting details of a WIKI article only a handful of people in the world will read, the breaks should stay. Daver68 (talk) 19:39, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
Hey,
I don't really care to much about this article. I'm just saying that if you look at most properly formatted articles in the wikipedia it doesn't have <br><br> after each paragraph. I'm not going to get into an edit war with you, but I would ask for consistency with the rest of the project that you remove them.
Thanks! --Mblumber (talk) 12:51, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
Nomination of David L. Richards for deletion
[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article David L. Richards is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David L. Richards until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Captain Eek Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 17:51, 24 September 2019 (UTC)