User talk:DasDasDas

Revised draft

Thank you. I have revised the draft copy and the pdf at the WWW Page is not being picked up by my plagiarism checkers.

Thank you, best regards and Happy New Year,

         Da Sa (DASDASDAS) 1723 01/01/2017

Your draft

I have removed the draft copy from this talk page. It's the wrong place to work on a draft. A copy is also located at Draft:David Sanders TD. There's still a lot of overlap with the source web page so I have also copied over the speedy deletion tag. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 16:35, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

Thank you. Roger that - removed draft copy from here but is still located at Draft:David Sanders TD. Noted overlap with source web page. I wrote both but will change the page anyway to remove any infringement possibility and check on "turnitin" or similar that it there is no over-lap before resubmitting.

  Best Regards and Happy New Year,
         Da Sa (DASDASDAS) 1635 01/01/2017

Contested deletion

Hi,

This page should not be speedy deleted as an unambiguous copyright infringement, because:

 1 - I wrote both the pages and there is not copyright infringement.
 2.  I will change the page anyway to remove any infringement possibility and check on "turnitin" or similar that it there is no over-lap.

    Best Regards and Happy New Year,

         Da Sa (DASDASDAS) 1635 01'01/2017

Your submission at Articles for creation: David Sanders TD (January 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Although this is largely sourced and informed, none of it actually satisfies our professors and scientists notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:David Sanders TD and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 19:17, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:David Sanders TD

Hello, DasDasDas. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "David Sanders TD".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 23:57, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: David Sanders (November 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Curbon7 were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Way too many inline external links, per WP:EL. Also 89 sources is way too many for an article of this size, per WP:BOMBARDMENT.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:David Sanders and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:David Sanders, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Curbon7 (talk) 06:17, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, DasDasDas! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Curbon7 (talk) 06:17, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:David Sanders

Hello, DasDasDas. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:David Sanders, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:01, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]