User talk:DarthRahn

This is DarthRahn's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Rrrichi 20:53, 9 April 2007 (UTC) Hello. About http://dota.brainmarket.ru Actually my page is english, but in russian domain. Are you tried to open it and look through?[reply]

/me looks through the website.

Classic DotA with AI Classical DotA 5 vs 5 with AI. Don't use this maps in official tournaments because not all of them are official and may have cheats. However as you can see we are working on cleaning out of links. There are many(and many) websites with same information you provided on your website(even official TDA), should we add all of them? @by DarthRahn|talk on 07:05, December 26, 2024 (UTC)

Image:Header2.png

Hello, DarthRahn. An automated process has found and removed an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, and thus is being used under fair use that was in your userspace. The image (Image:Header2.png) was found at the following location: User:DarthRahn. This image or media was attempted to be removed per criterion number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media was replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. Please find a free image or media to replace it with, and or remove the image from your userspace. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 04:38, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Header2.png

Hello, DarthRahn. An automated process has found and removed an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, and thus is being used under fair use that was in your userspace. The image (Image:Header2.png) was found at the following location: User:DarthRahn/header. This image or media was attempted to be removed per criterion number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media was replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. Please find a free image or media to replace it with, and or remove the image from your userspace. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 04:39, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Header2

either re-license the image or remove it from your userspace as FU images can only be used in the mainspace. Betacommand ^{(talk • contribs • Bot)} 15:56, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Looks better now? —comment added by DarthRahn(^u/_t\^c) 16:12, 14-May, 2007 year (UTC).

Hello DarthRahn

I would like to say that when a bot placed {{Orphaned fairuse not replaced|month=May|day=9|year=2007}} on your talk page because the image that you uploaded (header2) was not free, I was surprised as you had licensed the image under GFDL and so it had to be free. I have removed the bot's template - that said that the image would be deleted and I will contact the bot's owner...

Cheers,

Booksworm Talk to me! 16:17, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't get that... What was you trying to say? —comment added by DarthRahn(^u/_t\^c) 16:23, 14-May, 2007 year (UTC).

they got confused with my orphan tag as they did not check the history for the Fairuse tag. The image is fine now. Betacommand ^{(talk • contribs • Bot)} 16:27, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"Vandalism" on Dota Allstars

Oh, I apologize, I should've cited my sources. If you are referring to the "Guinsoo claimed credit" bit, I swear I remember reading that in a quest log in one of the older versions. Alas, my old computer is elsewhere right now and I can't quote it exactly, but I do remember there being a little part where Guinsoo says something about him doing the map all by himself as an original idea. I remember because it offended me when I read it because Eul's name appeared nowhere on the map or in the credits. At least Eul is mentioned in the Wikipedia article; I'll accept the revert since I can't find something to cite. ZenSaohu 17:28, 23 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Edit: He does appear on the scepter, but in the quest logs or loading screen Eul is never mentioned. ZenSaohu 17:29, 23 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Because he is mentioned in quests menu, but as IceFrog says all code was created from scratch. And I tend to trust him as all others. —comment added by DarthRahn(^u/_t\^c) 17:42, 23-May, 2007 year (UTC).

Apologies if i have done something wrong. Was just being helpful. John. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Johnlowe78 (talk • contribs) 07:19, 25 May 2007

Non-free use disputed for Image:Antonidas.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Antonidas.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 20:00, 31 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Zeratul

I've been enough edit wars, so see the talk page. That image is outdated and not representative of how Zeratul looks now. If you know the procedure for it, upload his SCII art and use that. That pic is outdated by a decade. The Clawed One 00:13, 3 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Look to your talk page, and don't discuss your problems here —comment added by DarthRahn(^u/_t\^c) 00:14, 3-June, 2007 year (UTC).

I don't have a problem, that fact is it is an outdated picture. It's like saying (http://www.dotontheweb.co.uk/original_simpsons.gif) is how the Simpsons look. That picture is inappropriate. The Clawed One 00:16, 3 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What do you mean by "his work"? The Clawed One 23:20, 3 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Zeratul.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Zeratul.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 21:52, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Dota642.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Dota642.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 16:55, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Dota642.jpg

I have tagged Image:Dota642.jpg as {{orphaned fairuse}}. In order for the image to be kept at Wikipedia, it must be included in at least one article. If this image is being used as a link target instead of displayed inline, please add {{not orphan}} to the image description page to prevent it being accidentally marked as orphaned again. Rette tast 20:08, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Antonidas.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Antonidas.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 08:39, 18 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Extremely important note about your signature

I noticed that you're using template transclusion-- a huuuuuge faux pas for signatures. The easiest way to fix this (if you want to keep your signature the way it is) is to use template substitution by adding "subst:" directly before all of the templates' names (e.g.: "{{subst:CURRENTTIME}}").

Using CURRENTTIME (and others) causes the timestamp to be updated continually on every page view to the time that the page is viewed, thus negating page caching. That means every time someone views your comment, it shows the current time-- no matter when you left it originally. This is misleading, as timestamps are added not to show everyone what time it is on wikipedia, but to show when a comment/contribution was added originally. Please test out the difference between the output of "~~~~" (with your custom timestamp disabled) and "~~~~" (with your custom timestamp enabled) to see what I'm talking about. Also experiment with the difference between using "subst:" and not.

Don't fret, though, as this is an easy mistake to make (it took me some time to figure out substitution as well). However, it is fairly important that before making further contributions that would use the current version of your signature, you either change or disable your custom signature for now. This can be done by simply going to "my preferences" -> "user profile" -> "signature", unchecking the "raw signature" box, and replacing the "signature" field with your user name ("DarthRahn"). You will then have a signature that is returned to its default state with an automatic timestamp when using "~~~~" to sign your posts. If you run across any problems, feel free to drop me a line. --slakr^\ talk / 21:25, 9 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That seems to be strange, indeed some bots for some reason tend to outdate my signature. However I currently use --- '''DarthRahn'''([[User:DarthRahn|'''u''']]/[[User_talk:DarthRahn|'''t''']]\[[Special:Contributions/DarthRahn|'''c''']]) {{subst:Time}} . I can not see anything wrong really since {{subst:Time}} works pretty well, but 03:38</nowiki> only shows the time, but not the month and year, etc. --- DarthRahn(^u/_t\^c) 07:05, December 26, 2024 (UTC)

Substitution isn't recursive, so substituting {{time}} outputs, "{{CURRENTTIME}}, [[{{CURRENTMONTHNAME}} {{CURRENTDAY}}]], [[{{CURRENTYEAR}}]] ([[Coordinated Universal Time|UTC]]) ," which still results in transclusion of CURRENTTIME, CURRENTMONTHNAME, CURRENTDAY, and CURRENTYEAR. You would thus need, instead of using {{time}}, to rather use the raw source of time, and use template substitution on each individual aspect of it (like {{subst:CURRENTTIME}}). Either way, you should no doubt already realize that your signature will reflect the current wikipedia time-- no matter when you left it. See for yourself: look at the timestamp of your comment directly preceding this one. Then compare it to the timestamp of when you actually added it (i.e., look at the page history). You'll notice that they don't match. Thus, I repeat: please change your signature as soon as possible to avoid further issues. --slakr^\ talk / 17:00, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Done. ps. 3 tilde is less than 4 :) --- DarthRahn(^u/_t\^c) 17:23, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sweet. :D Thanks a million. Cheers =) --slakr^\ talk / 00:49, 11 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Administrator intervention against vandalism

Thank you for making a report at Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism. Reporting and removing vandalism is vital to the functioning of Wikipedia and all users are encouraged to revert, warn, and report vandalism. However, administrators generally only block users if they have received a recent final warning (one that mentions that the user may be blocked) and they have recently vandalized after that warning was given. The reported user has not yet been blocked because it appears this has not occurred yet. If this user continues to vandalize after their final warning, please report them to the AIV noticeboard again. Thank you.

For requesting page protection consider Wikipedia:Requests for page protection. --Amir E. Aharoni 17:26, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Edit reversion

Hello,

Yesterday, I made a post about Dota Allstars listing the Heroes and Items available in the game, as well as crediting the developers who made them.

You reverted my post stating, "Reverting everything. Not need to list heroes/items again, we removed them in previous revisions. This is not encyclopedic in all ways."

I would just like some clarifications on a couple of things:

-Why would a list of heroes and items be irrelevant just because it was deleted before? May I know the reason why it was previously deleted? I feel that many DotA players(myself included) are curious to know who created what hero and item; which is why I researched who created what and when.

-Please clarify what you mean by "not encyclopedic in all ways". If there is something that I can do to revise the post to make it "encyclopedic", please let me know so that i can edit the post and put it up.

Thank you for your time, and I look forward to hearing your feedback —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mejai (talk • contribs) 19:40, 27 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It was deleted long ago, very long ago because of non notability. Wikipedia is not a game guide, peoples come here to read about the game itself, not about items and strategy. Also if you wanna start working with wikipedia you should start at least here. --- DarthRahn(^u/_t\^c) 21:51, 27 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I tend to disagree with your statement that players come to read about the game itself, not about items and strategy. But rather than argue that point, I will make the point that what makes DotA so different and compelling from other games is the large selection of Heroes and items it has. One can easily make the point that DotA's incredible selection of heroes and items is what MAKES the game. So my question is: how can you really try to explain the game and its experience without talking about the things that make it so unique? On a different note, I will make the point again that many players (myself included) are curious about the developers of the game (and their contributions). To that end, I have performed factual research into the builds of the game to create a comprehensive list of who made what. If, as you say, "peoples come here to read about the game itself", wouldn't they also want to know who created the game and what they did? It's like trying to talk about Apple and barely mentioning Steve Jobs, or Microsoft with Bill Gates. For DotA, the LARGEST part of its developments came from its stewards and their personal tastes; why are you cutting them out? Mejai(talk • contribs) 03:25, 28 September 2007

I gave you link? These are not my rules, but wikipedia rules. --- DarthRahn(^u/_t\^c) 15:35, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Antonidas.jpg

I have tagged Image:Antonidas.jpg as {{orphaned fairuse}}. In order for the image to be kept at Wikipedia, it must be included in at least one article. If this image is being used as a link target instead of displayed inline, please add {{not orphan}} to the image description page to prevent it being accidentally marked as orphaned again. Core desat 04:06, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Qurahn.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Qurahn.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 20:30, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:VariousDotaVersionsv2.jpg

A note regarding the image and, specifically, the template change that Zscout370 applied:

Screenshots showing the output of copyrighted programs are themselves copyrighted. As modification of a screenshot (including making a mosaic of the screenshots in a non-artistic manner, such as that image) create derivative works of the copyrighted screens, they are also copyrighted by the software creator. The creator of the screenshot has no legal rights in regards to the resulting image.

Please leave the copyright tag on the image as {{Non-free software screenshot}}. Modification of the tag will result in the image being tagged as "incorrectly licensed" and subject to speedy deletion.

Thank you. ~Kylu (u|t) 08:05, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

DotA

http://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Изображение:Gameinprogress.jpg - nice build lol. is it yours? :D 117.102.136.48 (talk) 18:14, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nope, got it somewhere --- DarthRahn(^u/_t\^c) 15:49, 23 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey you're that DarthRahn Guy

I read about you in DarkMist's moderator DotA tourney you so famous!!! Gaara the Fifth Kazekage (talk) 05:41, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks *blush* --- DarthRahn(^u/_t\^c) 16:05, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:Bnetdota.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Bnetdota.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 06:53, 2 December 2008 (UTC) --Skier Dude (talk) 06:53, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:47, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]