User talk:Danishdurrani

Holistic ten perspective

Can you please explain what this is? I can't find a single Google hit for this phrase. Corvus cornix_talk 08:29, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

the reason why you cant find a single hit on google is the very reason why i am writing this. please be patient and gimme some time as i am still in the process of explaining it.

You can't make things up and put them into Wikipedia. Wikipedia requires verifiability and reliable sources. Corvus cornix_talk 19:02, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I am not making things up. like I said I need some time to explain this model. i would add up some reliable source soon.

Proposed deletion of Holistic ten perspective

The article Holistic ten perspective has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable theory; completely lacks any references or coverage that I can find. Possibly WP:MADEUP.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Glenfarclas (talk) 08:30, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Holistic ten perspective for deletion

The article Holistic ten perspective is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Holistic ten perspective until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Corvus cornix_talk 19:01, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Holistic ten prespective model.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Holistic ten prespective model.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 10:05, 18 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Repost of Holistic ten perspectives

A tag has been placed on Holistic ten perspectives requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, because it appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion process. If you can indicate how it is different from the previously posted material, place the template {{hang on}} underneath the other template on the article and put a note on the page's discussion page saying why this article should stay. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please contact the administrator who deleted the page or use deletion review instead of continuing to recreate the page. Thank you. Corvus cornix_talk 01:01, 23 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]