User talk:Daniel Power of God/Archive 13

This is an archive of past discussions with User:Daniel Power of God. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 10

Archive 11

Archive 12

→

Your submission at Articles for creation: History of Central Africa (May 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Zoozaz1 was:

The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at Central Africa. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This article, and the others like it, consists of four separate sections that should be dealt with differently. The first is a short, well sourced blurb about prehistory/ancient history that should be added to the Central Africa article. The second consists of a list of various Central African polities, which is well suited to the current category system. It can be added to the Central Africa article if you convert it into prose. The third is a genetic analysis, which can be incorporated into the Central Africa article as well. The last is the timeline, which should have a separate, standalone article

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:History of Central Africa and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:History of Central Africa, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Zoozaz1 talk 01:46, 13 May 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: History of East Africa (May 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Zoozaz1 was:

The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at East Africa. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This article, and the others like it, consists of four separate sections that should be dealt with differently. The first is a short, well sourced blurb about prehistory/ancient history that should be added to the East Africa article. The second consists of a list of various East African polities, which is well suited to the current category system. It can be added to the East Africa article if you convert it into prose. The third is a genetic analysis, which can be incorporated into the Central Africa article as well. The last is the timeline, which should have a separate, standalone article

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:History of East Africa and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:History of East Africa, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Zoozaz1 talk 01:48, 13 May 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: History of Southern Africa (May 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Zoozaz1 was:

The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at Southern Africa. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This article, and the others like it, consists of four separate sections that should be dealt with differently. The first is a short, well sourced blurb about prehistory/ancient history that should be added to the Southern Africa article. The second consists of a list of various East African polities, which is well suited to the current category system. It can be added to the Southern Africa article if you convert it into prose. The third is a genetic analysis, which can be incorporated into the Southern Africa article as well. The last is the timeline, which should have a separate, standalone article

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:History of Southern Africa and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:History of Southern Africa, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Zoozaz1 talk 01:49, 13 May 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Old North African Languages (May 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Zoozaz1 was:

Neologisms are not considered suitable for Wikipedia unless they receive substantial use and press coverage; this requires strong evidence in independent, reliable, published sources. Links to sites specifically intended to promote the neologism itself do not establish its notability.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This seems to be a classification of unrelated languages that existed in the same area and time period created by Robert Blench; try to find sources independent of Blench that discuss the term.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Old North African Languages and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Old North African Languages, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Zoozaz1 talk 01:55, 13 May 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pastoral period has been accepted

Pastoral period, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Zoozaz1 talk 02:03, 13 May 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Prehistoric West Africa has been accepted

Prehistoric West Africa, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Zoozaz1 talk 02:10, 13 May 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Round Head Period has been accepted

Round Head Period, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Zoozaz1 talk 02:15, 13 May 2021 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:History of Central Africa has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:History of Central Africa. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 02:49, 13 May 2021 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:History of East Africa has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:History of East Africa. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 02:50, 13 May 2021 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:History of Southern Africa has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:History of Southern Africa. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 02:50, 13 May 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Aterian, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Atlantic Coast. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 13 May 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Conscious Community (May 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DGG was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

It is not clear that this is a distinc t orgnaiszation

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Conscious Community and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Conscious Community, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DGG ( talk ) 08:57, 13 May 2021 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Afrocentricity has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Afrocentricity. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 18:45, 13 May 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Basal West African has been accepted

Basal West African, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Devonian Wombat (talk) 22:58, 13 May 2021 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Afrocentricity has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Afrocentricity. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 01:20, 14 May 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Afrocentricity (May 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Robert McClenon were:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Afrocentrism instead.

The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at Afrocentrism. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This draft is a request to spin off an article. Proposals to spin out a topic from an article into another stand-alone article should be discussed at the talk page of the existing article, unless the draft satisfies a special notability guide. If the draft satisfies a special notability guide, please identify the notability criterion with a reliable source.

This does not mean that the draft should be spun off, and it does not mean that the draft should not be spun off. It does mean that discussion should be on the talk page of the existing article, Talk:Afrocentrism. (If this draft is resubmitted without discussion on the talk page of the existing article and does not satisfy a special notability guide, it may be Rejected or nominated for deletion.)

Please discuss first, as noted.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Afrocentricity and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Afrocentricity, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 01:23, 14 May 2021 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:History of East Africa has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:History of East Africa. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 13:06, 14 May 2021 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:History of Southern Africa has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:History of Southern Africa. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 13:07, 14 May 2021 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:History of Central Africa has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:History of Central Africa. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 13:07, 14 May 2021 (UTC)

Very good work

If I had seen them in time, I would have acceptedthe regional articles as you wrote them, for I think that It is reasonable to have a general article about the history of each each region, just as we do in Europe and Asia. It's also reasonable to have a general article on each time period, just as we do in Europe and Asia. At the next level, we have articles country by country, with sub-articles in there's enough material.

But it has already been handled differently, and I would only add confusion if I tried to change things in a radical way . There's no clear rule for when and how we split. Even if I think what you did was better, what's been done seems acceptable.

If I can give you any asistance with this or with your future work, please ask me on my talk page. I'm glad competent people such as yourself are working in this area. DGG ( talk ) 10:31, 15 May 2021 (UTC)

Anyurther merge discussions would be better in mainspace, where more people than the AfC regulars will see it. (Please notify me, for I shall probably oppose such merge) DGG ( talk ) 10:11, 15 May 2021 (UTC)}}

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tichitt Culture has been accepted

Tichitt Culture, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Zoozaz1 talk 01:21, 24 May 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 25

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sahara, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Urban.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 25 May 2021 (UTC)

This is an archive of past discussions with User:Daniel Power of God. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

→