User talk:Daniel5127/Archive II
This is an archive of past discussions with User:Daniel5127. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Bots
Hi! I think most of your questions are answered on WP:BOTS. Lupin|talk|popups 12:22, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
- Thank you for find the souces that I could read more about bots. Daniel5127 03:16, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
If I understand your question correctly you are asking about the word "VandalProof". Any use of the program does leave "using VandalProof" in the edit summary (example). If this is what you mean by your question, then yes you are correct. If you are asking why the program is named that, it is a combination of the words Vandal, and Proof. If this doesn't answer your question let me know, and please clarify your question. Thanks, Prodego talk 20:24, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
- Would you like to use VandalProof? I can approve you if you would like, since I am one of the moderators. Prodego talk 20:26, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
- It looks like you have already been approved, back when version 1.0 or 1.1 was active. I see the welcome message in your archives. All you have to do is download and install VandalProof. If you have any questions, just ask me. Happy editing! Prodego talk 23:16, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
Re: Contents.
I'm not quite sure what you want. Do you want the list of archives like I have at the top of my talk page? To get that, you simply type {{subst:archivebox}}, then save the page, and then edit it again to customize the box. --digital_me(t/c) 00:03, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
Signature
Daniel, I know. As you can see, I never use the time as you'll see why it's a waste of time for me when I sign this. If you could figure out what's going on-please tell me. I ethier get: 00:12 17 May 2006 ForestH2 (UTC) or ForestH2 00:12 17 May 2006 (UTC)ForestH2. Using three tidles is easier though the time is important. ForestH2
Furthermore I don't wish to have my name mixed up or I would use ~~~~. Do you think I should add a talk and contribs to my signature? --ForestH2
Username
Short for Just zis Guy, you know? which was my original username, usenet sig, website headline, and general purpose handle. Just zis Guy you know? 07:55, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
Re: Username & Cat
First of all, my username: no one impersonated anyone. Actually, Mrlefty was here before I was, and I didn't know he existed. Luckily, he doesn't seem to be very active on the site, so it's not a big problem. As for your cat question, I assume you mean the picture that says "Ceiling cat is watching you masturbate." It doesn't really mean anything, I just thought it was a funny picture. Hope that clears stuff up. Mr. Lefty Talk to me! 17:29, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
If you haven't already done so, you can click on the title of this post to find out more about it. Basically, Firefox is an internet browser that is 10x better than internet explorer, but don't take my word for it! Download it yourself and see. As for User:FireFox, well that's a different story... LOL! Just kidding. He is an administrator, and is too and advocate for Mozilla Firefox, so you ought to ask him about it too while you're at it as he has a lot of nasty things to say about IE... --Pilot|guy (roger that) 20:16, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
time
in response to my talk page:
no time is based on UTC. sorry i didnt understand your message all that well.-- Alfakim -- talk 00:34, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
Your Wikismile
hehehe... thanks for that. Hey, if you want to enable your email some time in the future, I have something to tell you. --Deathphoenix ʕ 07:12, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
- Never mind, you have to enable Wikipedia email to receive it. It's probably best for you not to actually give out your email publicly on Wikipedia. --Deathphoenix ʕ 04:37, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
San Francisco
I did everything in San Francisco. I'm talking about it on my blog. With pictures. Bastique▼parler voir 03:17, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
Hello
Forgive me for saying this, but your English seems a little simplistic. Have you considered contributing to Simple English or Chinese or other language Wikis? NSLE(T+C) at 04:08 UTC (2006-06-09)
- what do you mean that my English is little simplistic? No, I have never considered to contribute in Simple English or chinese Wikipedia. But thanks you for your advice.'''*Daniel*''' 04:16, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
Tools
You posted on my talk page but I'm not sure what you were refering to. All the information on the tools I provided is in these locations:
- WP:AWB (and my custom settings here)
- WP:VandalProof
- User:mboverload/monobook.js
--mboverload@ 07:55, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
Thank you
Thanks for your words of support both at my RfA and on my talk page. I'm flattered that so many people would have liked to nominate me. —Cuiviénen 15:19, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
—Cuiviénen has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Smile to others by adding {{subst:smile}}, {{subst:smile2}} or {{subst:smile3}} to their talk page with a friendly message. Happy editing!
Nomination for admin
You can nominate yourself or another user for admin by following the procedure at WP:RfA. Alethiophile 16:04, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
- I must warn you, be prepared and expect many oppose votes against you if you choose to nominate yourself. If you choose to nominate someone else, it's better to clear it with them first. Cheers, NSLE (T+C) at 16:07 UTC (2006-06-10)
Ahh term
Just wondering, is there some reason you use the term "Ahh" a lot? ForestH2 16:57, 28 December 2024 (UTC)
- Just curious. Go to your user page and see the most recent vandalisim I reverted. Tell me how bad that is....I've asked that that IP be blocked, and your page be protected. Your page is hit with vandals almost every day. ForestH2
- Daniel, other admins can protect this page. I'm not excatly sure what you mean in your note about protection. ForestH2
Penguin.
When I just saw penguin in your RFA Thank You message, you put the Penguins on your signature. Do you still use Penguin Signature? Reply in my discussion's page? *~Daniel~* 04:28, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
- It is now not allowed in WP:SIG to use images, so I have switched. LINUXERIST@ 04:38, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
- Before that, Penguin signature was allowed. Right? *~Daniel~* 04:39, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
- When I sent the message out; yes. Why? LINUXERIST@ 04:53, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
- Before that, Penguin signature was allowed. Right? *~Daniel~* 04:39, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
re:Hello.
Thats a lovely sentiment. Sure, I'll be one of your friend, and thanks for the smile. ;-) It looks like I got a bunch a friends don't it? I gotta branch that big list into seperate sections ;-) — The King of Kings 04:49, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
- Ocasionally I go by Esperanza. I don't participate in the Coffee Lounge as much as I want too, but I wish I did, too much stress on Wikipedia. ;-) Why, anything good happening at Esperanza right now? — The King of Kings 06:30, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
Re: Images
Hi. You need to follow the instructions on the upload page accurately. Most images found in the web cannot be used on Wikipedia. The source of the image, if used, must be fully cited using common sense: the URL of where you got it might not be the real source of the image, for example (original source of publication, photographer, etc.). If there's something you really want to uplad, ask at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions, 'cause I'm going to be away for a couple of days. The JPStalk to me 08:03, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
Hello
Hi there. You probably have no idea who I am, so let me introduce myself. I am Kingfisherswift and I read your entry on Moe's Talk page. If you would like it, I could also be your virtual-friend and tell you anything you want to know. I am doing this not because I am odd - although I am - but because I believe in sharing knowledge with others, and spreading it to as many as possible. Most people who join this site share my sentiments. So, please, I would be honoured if you gave me any shards of information I could use on this site. I have only been on wikipedia since january, so I am also fairly new. Cheers! Kingfisherswift 11:56, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
P.S. On my userpage you will find a few users I have credited, who you may also find friendly and helpful. Thanks! Kingfisherswift 11:56, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
The meaning of brass and other mysteries
Hi Daniel, thanks for the note. Regarding your question, the name comes from a backup band named Tijuana Brass, led by a guy named Herb Alpert. He was pretty big some thirty to fourty years ago, although the band did mostly all instrumental songs, with no words. If you've ever heard mariachi, it sounded a little bit like that. Very cool stuff. And, if you're curious where that name came from, you may have heard the term "brass" used to refer to the group a group of instruments (such as trumpets, trombones, etc... you can look at Brass instrument if you're bored). Hence the "brass". The Tijuana part came in because Alpert was inspired by music he heard while visiting Tijuana; after he came home and switched to a new sound, he had a top ten hit not long thereafter.
Probably more information that you were interested in, but these things happen when you get me going on a band I like. Thanks for asking. Tijuana BrassE@ 16:52, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
My RfA
Hello, Daniel5127/Archive II, and thank you for the supportive vote on my recent RfA! With a final vote of 84/1/4, I have now been entrusted with the mop, bucket and keys. I will be slowly acclimating myself to my new tools over the next months, but welcome any and all feedback and suggestions on how I might be able to use them to help the project. Thanks again! - Kukini 13:29, 13 June 2006 (UTC) |
Thanks Daniel
Dear Daniel, thanks for your support during my recent successful request for adminship. I really appreciate it. Good luck in your quest to become a scientist! Let me know if I can help you with anything administrative. Take care. -- Samir धर्म 04:53, 15 June 2006 (UTC) |
Wdefcon
I'm not the only one editting it. I usually edit the Wdefcon template when I use VandalProof. Anonymous__Anonymous 10:12, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
Your message
Why should I not "ignore" your message if I don't have any response to make to it? Quite frankly I don't care if there are some who have nothing better to do than vandalise my user page, beyond the fact that it distracts others from doing more valuable work. The act says far more about them than it does me, --pgk(talk) 16:21, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
- Vandalism on France appears to be easily managable at this time, page protection should be avoided if othere methods to control vandalism are viable. This page is also likely rather watched. If vandals start getting bad, please report them on WP:AIV or request page protection at WP:RFPP. Thanks, — xaosflux Talk 17:02, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for Supporting my RfA!
My Request for Adminship passed by a margin of 54/6/1. I hope to serve the community well in the future. If you see me doing anything I shouldn't with my admin duties, feel free to let me know. Thanks again, Ian Manka Talk to me! 00:38, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
Hi
I'm trying to figure out what's going on here. Maybe some of it is a misunderstanding. Take this edit for example. 72.134.46.91 was actually correcting the grammar on your user page -- his version was better English than yours -- so you should not have warned him with a vandalism template. I don't want to hurt your feelings, Daniel, but I'm not sure your grasp of English is good enough for you to distinguish vandalism from other edits. I think it would be better is you didn't go vandalism-hunting. —Bunchofgrapes (talk) 03:57, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
ForestH2.
The best place to raise the issue is on Wikipedia:Administrators Noticeboard/Incidents, where other administrators can see it and look into it. I rarely get involved in disputes between users due to the other functions I have to perform; it's very difficult to handle checkuser, mediation, and other requests on an individual when I've been involved with handling conflicts between them and other users. Essjay (Talk • Connect) 05:31, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
My user page
I was bored so I had some fun with my userpage. Take a look at Cyde's page. He was the one who gave me the idea for my page. :-P --Lord Deskana I VALUE YOUR OPINIONS 07:31, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
Wikibreak
Yeah, I was on Wikibreak. Remember you? Of course I remember you, and if I didn't I'm sure your signature would tell me. ;-) Anyways, sorry for disappearing all the sudden. Hope your exams go well and hope to see more of you on Wikipedia during your summer break. Cheers! — The King of Kings 17:52, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
Thank you for your support
Thank you very much for your support on my recent RfA. I am pleased to announce that it passed with a tally of 72/11/1, and I am now an administrator. I'll be taking things slowly at first and getting used to the tools, but please let me know if there are any admin jobs I can do to help you, now or in the future. —Cuiviénen 02:24, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
re:My friend.
Hey Daniel. eh, I never liked math myself, more of a science person. I'm pretty good at math, but I am no expert or anything. I already went through Geometry a while ago and yes, proofs were the hardest thing. You're school ends pretty late doesn't it? Mine ended on May 17th. Hope you do good on your exams :-) Your friend, — The King of Kings 01:36, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
- Nope, same age as you. :-) — The King of Kings 02:22, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
Hi Daniel5127. Thanks for your questions. Have you read the article? Have you followed the links? You'll find your questions answered there. If you find the article inadequate or still have questions, please use its Talk page or Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Judaism. Out of curiosity, why did you decide to ask me? Thank you. ←Humus sapiens ну? 07:21, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
edit count
Hello Daniel. I saw you on Dakota's page. User:Interiot/Tool2/code.js works for me at least - I'm using Firefox. All the best.Blnguyen | rant-line 06:06, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
- I use Flcelloguy's tool which works well for me. Interiot/Tool2/code.js is good also.--Dakota ~ 17:45, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
- Here is a link to info about edit counting.[1].--Dakota ~ 17:50, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
Hi, my dear Daniel!
Hi, my dear Daniel! So sorry it took me a few days to reply, but trust me, I'm having quite a bit of trouble finding time to spend at WP lately... can't wait for my vacation :( Anyway, i simply wanted to give you a warm "thank you!" for approaching me and offering me your friendship, which I'm honored to accept. As I know from my own experience, it is somewhat daunting not to have many to ask for help when you need it, or if you simply feel like talking. So please, should you ever need me, please don't be shy and drop by my Talk page - just let me know you're coming, and make sure to bring the beer! (unless you're not 18 or older, in which case I'll just make some chocolate ;) Big hug, Phædriel ♥ tell me - 23:10, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
Reply
Hey Daniel, thanks for the smile! Thank goodness you didn't get any proof questions on your exam. Good to hear you did good on your exams, probably better than me. I don't have much time since I got on Wikipedia. ;-) Finally on Summer vacation huh? Good to hear! Hope to hear from you again. Cheers! — The King of Kings 01:20, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
- Sorry for the late reply. No, I am going to be in the 12th next year. — The King of Kings 02:11, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
Re: Question.
- Good question. I checked it out a day or so ago when the message first popped up. Wikimania is an annual conference held by Wikimedia, the parent foundation of Wikipedia. The purpose appears to be to increase relationships and cooperation between members of the different Wiki projects (e.g. Wictionary, Wikipedia, etc.). Early registration helps them to better plan the event...hence the discount. There also appears to be a *massive* discount for active members of Wikipedia (something like 60-70%). As for the scholarships, they cover travel to the event. I'm not sure what the selection criteria is. I hope that helps! Let me know if you have any other questions.
- Regards, --Alphachimp talk 04:11, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
Rollback on sodium iodide
Thanks for keeping an eye out for vandalism on chemistry pages: however, I think you were overzealous in rolling back this edit: it led to a complaint on Talk:Sodium iodide. I've reverted your rollback, so there's no great harm done. Keep up the rest of your good work, Physchim62 (talk) 11:34, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
- Sorry for misunderstand. I just considered this [2] as vandalism. But Thank you for your message that someone already discusssed and then edited it. Therefor, I will keep an eye on article. *~Daniel~* 16:51, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
A short Esperanzial update
As you may have gathered, discussions have been raging for about a week on the Esperanza talk page as to the future direction of Esperanza. Some of these are still ongoing and warrant more input (such as the idea to scrap the members list altogether). However, some decisions have been made and the charter has hence been amended. See what happened. Basically, the whole leadership has had a reshuffle, so please review the new, improved charter.
As a result, we are electing 4 people this month. They will replace JoanneB and Pschemp and form a new tranche A, serving until December. Elections will begin on 2006-07-02 and last until 2006-07-09. If you wish to run for a Council position, add your name to the list before 2006-07-02. For more details, see Wikipedia:Esperanza/June 2006 elections.
Thanks and kind, Esperanzial regards, —Celestianpower háblame 16:00, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
Melmac
Ever since the days I worked on VAX machines, I have used ALF as my general computer "ID", inspired by the little furry orange alien Alf, who came from a planet called Melmac. Hope that helps answer your questions. --Alf melmac 23:03, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
My user page
Hi Daniel. My userpage wsn't deleted, its just redirected to my talk page now. I don't feel well right now, could we wait a couple of days before chatting? — The King of Kings 01:49 June 25 '06
- Thanks ;-) — The King of Kings 01:52 June 25 '06
- Oh, moodiness is over, feel free to chat :-) — The King of Kings 05:42 June 28 '06
- Thanks ;-) — The King of Kings 01:52 June 25 '06
External Link(s) Deleted
Hello Daniel. It appears you remmoved a link I placed in the external link section today to our webzine site for photos from a Slayer concert. I am stumped as to why. It's no more commercial than the other links in the section, it is linked to content, and its not my personal web page.
- I have no idea, Sorry I can't explain about External Link very well, or you can ask another Wikipedian(experienced) about External Links. Sorry for that. *~Daniel~* 03:05, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
Are You the one that deleted it? That is who I need to talk to.
- Yes, I deleted the External Link. *~Daniel~* 06:03, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
External links
Trying to decide what to link to or not link to can be difficult. There is one thing that is always OK to link to and that is the offical site of the article. As an example, an article about "Windows XP" would want an external link to "Microsoft". An easy example of what not to link to would be an article about a band, you wouldn't link to a site that allowed you to download illegal mp3's. One of the things you can do with people like the user above is to suggest that they ask on the talk page of the article they want to add the link to. A couple of good places for information is Wikipedia:External links and Wikipedia:Spam. If you have questions about what is a spam link then the talk page Wikipedia:WikiProject Spam will usually be able to help. Hope this helps and let me know if you have anymore questions. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 08:13, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
Thanks
Hello Daniel. Thanks for reverting my talk page. There's no need to panic unduly, it's just a vandal from the Houston, Texas area who has taken a fancy to vandalising my talk page every few days (or three times so far tonight!). This particular vandal is so well known there's a template, {{Johnny the Vandal}} to put on his talk page when we indefinitely ban him - which usually happens a few minutes after he creates the account! -- Arwel (talk) 22:29, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
Moving articles
For moving regular articles, there is a "Move" tab at the top of the page, beside the "Watch" tab. However, for example: if you want to move "Joe (person)" to "Joe" but "Joe" already redirects to "Joe (person)," you'll need to contact an admin for help. We can delete the redirect page and make the move; this way, the page history remains intact. -→Buchanan-Hermit™/?! 22:45, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
- The ones moved without an admin's help is usually when you're moving (existing article A)-->(non-existing article B). If you're moving (existing article A)-->(article that redirects to existing article A), then you'd need an admin. -→Buchanan-Hermit™/?! 22:49, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
- No problem. Glad to help out. :) -→Buchanan-Hermit™/?! 22:57, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
Vandalisim
Post to WP:AIV for any users you want blocked. ForestH2 22:55, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
- I'm verry sorry for doing that though I must admit that if I did personal attack you you violated the 3RR. I noticed your edits and I thought most of the stuff you do is revert vandalisim. Though-when asking about page protection you need to post at requests for page protection and vandalisim has to be on the day that you requested protection and it has to be a lot. I won't personal attack you anymore. ForestH2
- P.S- you did vandalize something. I forgot now. I'll look in your contribs. And, I think you ought to use the warning templates, correctly. And never remove messages or violate the 3RR. Could you work on your grammer? ForestH2 23:26, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
- Your signature by the way....could you please add a talk link and a contribs link? ForestH2 23:26, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
- Why is it you don't want your page protected? ForestH2 23:27, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
- I also think that you'd be a great admin ForestH2 23:27, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
- Daniel, sorry for the misunderstanding. I told Jurgens that if he thought you were the person who vandalized he should revert your edits. On the other hand, I know Jurgens is vandalizing. ForestH2
Hmmm...
What do you mean per above, on Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/AMK152? ForestH2 02:44, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
Re: Signature
I must have been busy and probably forgot to reply to your smile you sent me. Thanks! Yes I did change my signature because brenneman {L} Said it was too colorful and he gave me some options. °≈§→ Robomaeyhem: T/←§≈° 03:12, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
You are fighting a losing battle
I think that many people would argue that YouTube is not a commercial site and appreciate having a quick hint to a full version of the subject of the "Penny Lane" article. What is your goal? To eradicate YouTube links? You could start here, but really, you would have to go [3] where I think you will see that there are already hundreds of such links. Really, what is your goal? To eradicate all YouTube links, for some reason? And what would you have achieved then? You would have "added more information" to the encyclopedia? I do not think so. You would have kept the encyclopedia coforming to your idea of purity? The YouTube links I added were with the intent of providing the reader with easy access to the media material being discussed. It represents additional information, just like any other external link. -- 75.24.210.224 04:00, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
Sorry for misunderstanding about YouTube as External Link vandalism. I considered YouTube as vandalism. But thanks for giving me advice on this. No, My goal is not eradicate all YouTube Links. Everyone can make mistakes. You forgot to assume a good faith. Assuming good Faith is very important in Wikipedia, could be belonged to Civility. As I mentioned above, If I make mistakes, I will apologize for them, and fix it. but some of External Link is not allowed wikipedia. I'm not here to eradicate every External Links, that's completely nonsense. I feel that your behaviour is absolutely uncivil. So, please be less likely perceived as insulting.*~Daniel~* 04:25, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
Userbox Templates
- To be honest I've never created a template here (I think) and definitely not a userbox one, which is what I think you are after. Have a look on the page WP:Userboxes to see if there is a template for chemistry as I think there may well be one, otherwise links through and from that page should give you the information you need. Sorry I can't be of more help but it isn't an area I know much about. Ben W Bell talk 06:53, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
Quick Question
Daniel, how do I welcome new users, upload images, and move pages? Can you reply back on my talk page? GrasslandT 15:20, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
- And I see you've been in constant dispute with ForestH2. It seems as though your innocent. I would reccommend reporting any more disputes with ForestH2 at the Admins noticebiard or WP:ADMIN or WP:AIV. I think it's good you asked other admins about dealing with this but you might just want to go directly to these two links. I know ForestH2 and he has told me about his problem with you. I hate to say this, but he calls you "Daniel has the worst grammer I've ever seen" which I disagree. Someone with worse grammer would be like not even knowing to start sentences with a captial letter. What's your first language? Can you answer the question above? Happy editing. GrasslandT 02:56, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
GrasslandT has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Smile to others by adding {{subst:smile}}, {{subst:smile2}} or {{subst:smile3}} to their talk page with a friendly message. Happy editing!
Sorry
Sorry to bother you. Once an Articles for Deletion is closed please don't vote keep or delete or anything else because the desicon has already been decided and if the page has been deleted your vote doesn't count. ForestH2 | + | √ | - 00:47, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
ForestH2 has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Smile to others by adding {{subst:smile}}, {{subst:smile2}} or {{subst:smile3}} to their talk page with a friendly message. Happy editing!
Re:What's up.
I have just been very stressed is all, nothing to worry about. :D — The King of Kings 04:59 June 30 '06
- I would get into more specifics, but I'd rather not. :) — The King of Kings 05:07 June 30 '06
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
You called?
What do you wanna know about my username? Thanks for the barnstar!!!!!!! It's good to know people notice my work. Thanks again. --LV (Dark Mark) 12:01, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
Hello.
Sorry for interrupting you, I have seen your message many times in someone's discussion's page. But You just copied whole thing. I'm so sorry to say that your message is so confusing like you copied someone's message, not only response. Next time, Please only put your response, after you reply some Wikipedian's message in this discussion page. *~Daniel~* 00:27, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
- I don't know. I thought it was good to also put the question or comment given when your reply. And I'm sure how it is confusing. It's good to put the question or comment and the answer so I can know the question and the answer and you can remember the question more easily and compare it to the comment. ForestH2 00:45, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
- Were either of you two talking to me? The above exchange appears to be a private conversation that has spilled out on to my Talk page by mistake. Just in case you were talking to me and wanted my views on Talk page etiquette, you can find official guidance at Wikipedia:Talk_page#How_to_keep_a_two-way_conversation_readable. I prefer to keep contributors' exchanges in one place for ease of reference at a later date. Please be civil when trying to tell other editors and administrators how to conduct themselves with other users! Policy is very easy to find using Google's advanced search features. (aeropagitica) (talk) 17:35, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
- Thank you. I noticed that Daniel never communicated with and went through your contributions and just decided to give you the note. I sort of wonder why it's so confusing. And I really can't even understand his message because of his grammer ForestH2 | + | √ | - 17:54, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
Utterly confused, and ridiculous *~Daniel~* ☎ 21:15, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
Let's not start this again
Let's not start this again. Do not remove messages from your talk page. ForestH2 | + | √ | √- | - 23:50, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
Your page is getting a little long. You may wish to archive it as Archive 2. ForestH2 | + | √ | √- | - 00:18, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
RfA thanks
Thank you very much for your support for my recent RfA, which I'm quite happy to announce has passed with a consensus of 67 supporting, 0 opposed and 0 neutral. I'm glad I meet your criteria. Most of all, I'm glad you took the time to evaluate my candidacy, as I believe that's what keeps RfA running smoothly, and I'll be working hard to justify the vote of confidence you've placed in me. Please let me know at my talk page if I can assist you with any admin-related tasks, or just if you have any comments on my performance as an admin. Thanks! TheProject 02:18, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
Duplicate vote
Hi Daniel, you seem to be both neutral & in support of getcrunk's RFA. Can you please clarify your vote & strike-out the duplicate one? Thanks --Srikeit (Talk | Review me!) 05:46, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
- Oops, Sorry about that. My computer was broken, so I fixed it. OK. I will put Neutral on that. *~Daniel~* 01:54, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Getcrunk 2
Dear Daniel. you seem to have voted twice in Getcrunk's RFA, voting both Support and Neutral. If you could fix this discrepancy, it would be deeply appreciated. Regards, Highway Batman! 12:09, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
- Same as Reply on Srikeit's message. *~Daniel~* 01:54, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
RFA thanks
RfA Thank you
Thank you!
Thank you, Daniel, for your support in my RfA. I appreciate your trust and support, and I will do my best to further help this great encyclopædia and community of ours. If there is anything that you feel I can do to help, please let me know. -- Avi 02:50, 4 July 2006 (UTC) |
Hello
Just a quick note when some vandalizes other userpage and blanks it, or an article you can put {{Template:Blank}}, {{Template:Blank1}}. Or you can do it how you did by just putting your own sentences. ForestH2 not logged in. ForestH2
- Oh and see [[Category:User warning templates]] for more. Oops! Category's at the bottom. My computer's acting up. Uh, just type in on the search box to the left the category and then you'll see it. ForestH2
Re: Hellow.
Yeah, go for it, everyone can. — FireFox 20:13, 04 July '06
False positive, OrphanBot error
Hello. Your bot's reversion of the message I left on a user's page (diff) was in error.
Granted, the summary used a swear word, but that was a playful reference to the topic, which the target user will recognize easily. (Cf. the Trivia section of The Fall of Troy (album), then its talk page, especially if you want to fight actual vandalism and censorship at work.)
Another time, I'll try and write "F*ck" in the edit summary. On your side, could you please try and adjust the filters of your bot, or better, use a human-assisted approach? IMO, fully automatic bots are often a problem of their own.
Regards, -- 62.147.113.238 20:56, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
- I reverted your messages on user's page, because you used abusive words which is unacceptable in Wikipedia. Also, you misunderstood that I'm the owner of OrphanBot. Sorry, I'm not owner of OrphanBot. *~Daniel~* ☎ 06:07, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
My RFA
Hi Daniel, Astrology was going through an edit war (see Talk:Astrology). But you're right, I should probably have unprotected it earlier. I've unprotected it and we'll see what happens. Thanks for bringing it to my attention! -- Samir धर्म 02:10, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
Categories
Hi Dan! Oh, but I'm so the wrong person to ask!
Categories remain to me a mystery I've never quite grasped. I've tried several times, and have even be successful in the obvious things, but the actual high quality decisions? No... sadly, my brain isn't wired that way.
But it's cool. Wikipedia has a large number of slaves who have been forced to work for us, using their exceptional abilities to make the lives of the owners easier.
We confine these people to Wikipedia:Category schemes and Wikipedia:Category where they are forced to toil night and day for the benefit of those of us who cannot do such a job. And we universally underappreciate them for it and rarely set them free.
If you'd like to join them, I'm happy to enslave you and they will be happy to have you. You would be needed, underappreciated and would be performing a skilled job that no-one notices but everyone needs. If you wish to remain free but at a loss, then the best I can advise is to use commonsense. Watch what the slaves do, try to understand why they do it, try to emulate their hard work. But if your brain is like mine and is ill-wired for such work, just make a good natured rough stab at it, then be thankful when someone cleans up after you and be suitably rueful when you get warned about miscategorisations you have done. And thank the catslaves now and again. It helps.
Hope this helps! ➨ ЯEDVERS 21:09, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
RE: Birthday
Thanks for the Birthday wishes! :) Darthgriz98 02:49, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Treebark 21:28, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
Please do not remove messages from your talk page. Talk pages exist as a record of communication, and in any case, comments are available through the page history. You're welcome to archive your talk page, but be sure to provide a link to any deleted comments. Thanks. Treebark 22:31, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to remove warning messages from your talk page, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. ForestH2 | + | √+ | √ | √- | - 04:24, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
Utterly ridiculous. For those interested, see my reply lower down on the page. --M1ss1ontomars2k4 (T | C | @) 17:57, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
Thanks!
Thanks for the barnstar :). I wasn't expecting it, but it's certainly appreciated! Fabricationary 23:52, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for your support in my RfA!
Thanks for voting! Hello Daniel5127/Archive II, and thanks for your support in my recent RfA. I'm pleased to announce that it passed with a final tally of (96/0/0). I was overwhelmed by all of the nice comments and votes of confidence from everyone. Thanks again, and see you around! OhNoitsJamie Talk 02:09, 7 July 2006 (UTC) |
Reverting on your talk page
Is there some reason you keep reverting Treebark's edit? He is pointing out to you that you vandalized the Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire (film) page. Another user discussed this on Treebark's talk page. You obviously did not even think about looking at the talk page to see why the plot was so small when you reverted. Next time, you might want to look at the talk page before making any really big reverts. And I am very interested to see why you don't expect a vandalisim warning. ForestH2 | + | √+ | √ | √- | - 16:56, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
- Hello! I've been trying to point out that Daniel5127's edit was not, in fact, vandalism. This entire misunderstanding occurred when Raditzu tried to cut down on the plot in the article but left no edit summary. This looked like vandalism to him, Xaosflux, and me, so we all had our turns reverting. It wasn't until I asked Treebark what the blanking warning was for that he told me it was for reverting to a version that was too long. If you'll take a look at WP:VAND (in particular, the second paragraph), you'll see that a "good-faith effort to improve the encyclopedia, even if misguided or ill-considered, is not vandalism." Therefore, the warning does not belong on this page, especially since Daniel5127 reverted what he and two other users saw as blanking. --M1ss1ontomars2k4 (T | C | @) 17:52, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
- Someone should be able to look at the talkpage of the article in question It was not a good faith effort. A good faith effort would be to make sure it does not violate the standard summary, he reverted it so it would violate the standard summary. What he was doing was vandalisim, as it was violating the summary. He should have know that. Treebark 18:13, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
- This misunderstanding, I repeat, was caused by a lack of an edit summary on Raditzu's part. --M1ss1ontomars2k4 (T | C | @) 21:18, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
- Someone should be able to look at the talkpage of the article in question It was not a good faith effort. A good faith effort would be to make sure it does not violate the standard summary, he reverted it so it would violate the standard summary. What he was doing was vandalisim, as it was violating the summary. He should have know that. Treebark 18:13, 7 July 2006 (UTC)