User talk:Cyberchip

Please leave any comments about any edits here, at the bottom of the page. Thanks you for your consideration. --Cyberchip (talk) 13:20, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Warner Chappell

Has the practice been cited in any third-party sources? OR=original research; just citing the YouTube video in question isn't enough. Now, if you find an article in another publication (a news outlet, a trade journal) that says the same thing, and cite that - that wouldn't be original research. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 05:52, 25 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

What is it about OR that's unacceptable; you say it like I'm unable, or do not have the professional background to provide OR. So, your statement, in and of itself, doesn't make me feel as if it shouldn't be included. I could write an article, which then bought and printed/posted from a 3rd party source, would you then consider that legitimate? Is this Wiki policy? Just like if a million people say a foolish thing, it is still a foolish thing; I can also logically state that a foolish thing stated by one individual is still a foolish thing. Now you may consider that OR; but, it is proven axiomatically, whether it is said by you, or by me. So again, re-iterate your stance, and supply additional incentive for me to regard your edit. It's not like I'm not trying here. I question your understanding of axiomatic proof. The proof is in the statement. If it is observably factual, then the truth exist by virtue of being true.

At this point; for all I know, you're just a paid lackey by Warner Chappell sent to keep unfavorable news from appearing on their Wiki page; at which point, I would no longer regard your opinion as substantiated and seek approval for a lock in, or permanent placement elsewhere. Cyberchip (talk) 09:18, 26 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

March 2014

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Quantum gravity has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Quantum gravity was changed by Cyberchip (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.881342 on 2014-03-07T04:18:09+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 04:18, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]