User talk:Cryptozoo

User talk:Cryptozoo/Archive

Me again. I haven't reverted any of your recent edits - other editors have been watching your page (and you can see who has been doing what by clicking on the "History" tab at the top of the article). However, I do understand their reasoning. It's not wrong to provide updated information about your books and research, but some of your edits do sound like you're trying to sell a product. For example, that bit about the "new paperbound edition" of Mysterious America definitely strikes me as an advertisement. You may (and should) mention the book in the article and use it as a source, but you don't need to announce that a new edition is coming out. We're not Amazon.com, and it's just unencyclopedic. Also, when you write that "Loren Coleman is considered to be the world's leading cryptozoologist," or something to that effect, provide an outside source to show exactly who considers you to be the world's leading cryptozoologist, because otherwise, it sounds like self-promotion (which means someone is going to delete it). Just some friendly advice. :)

If you chose to respond, I'd prefer that you leave a message on my talk page. Just edit it like you would any other page; I don't care how you format the message.

Thanks, Zagalejo 04:07, 23 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia....

Welcome!

Hello, Cryptozoo, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!

If you need further assisstance, go to my Userpage. You'll find Wikipedia protocol and Wiki-resources that will be of assisstance to you. Heard and seen you on TV and radio, incl. the show Coast To Coast AM with George Noory. Some of what other wikipedians are referring to are in my listings of Wikipedia protocol and resources. Martial Law 00:21, 25 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

COI concerns

If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

editing articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with,
participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors,
linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam);
and you must always:
avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially neutral point of view, verifiability, and autobiography.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see Wikipedia:Business' FAQ. For more details about what constitutes a conflict of interest, please see Wikipedia:Conflict of Interest. Thank you. --Orange Mike 16:39, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]