User talk:CryptoLegend

December 2021

Hello, I'm 331dot. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Cryptocurrencies in Europe, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. 331dot (talk) 11:57, 6 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in blockchain and cryptocurrencies. Due to past disruption in this topic area, the community has enacted a more stringent set of rules. Any administrator may impose sanctions—such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks—on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on these sanctions. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

331dot (talk) 11:57, 6 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Cryptocurrencies in Europe, you may be blocked from editing. I would strongly suggest that you propose edits on the article talk page as edit requests, see WP:ER for instructions. 331dot (talk) 12:15, 6 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@331dot: I have deleted some sources and added more reliable global legal insights. Thank you for your edits.--CryptoLegend (talk) 14:08, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

sources

Please be advised that we are only using high quality sources on all crypto articles, such as Fortune.com, FT, WSJ, nyt, etc. We are not using coindesk, theblock, etc. Thank you, Jtbobwaysf (talk) 20:25, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your remark, I will consider it. CryptoLegend (talk) 06:41, 6 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Consider it harder, please. Again, please stop adding these random crypto sources. They are not reliable and should not be cited at all. Stick to high-quality source. Ignoring this request could be seen as disruptive. Grayfell (talk) 00:19, 8 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

overtag and overlink

You tagged a number of articles, please review WP:OVERTAG and WP:OVERLINK. Also on a tag I saw you used the wrong date. Why did you add a tag here with a two year old date? This isnt helpful. Thanks Jtbobwaysf (talk) 21:44, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Easy Crypto moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Easy Crypto, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:41, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Draft:Easy Crypto

If this was the first article that you created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

The page Draft:Easy Crypto has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seemed to be unambiguous advertising which only promoted a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to have been fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. GeneralNotability (talk) 01:49, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:53, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, CryptoLegend. Thank you for your work on Franco Abbina. North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good start

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 03:34, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Gate.io for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gate.io is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gate.io until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Uhooep (talk) 15:32, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]