User talk:CreativeWikiWorks

Welcome!

Hello, CreativeWikiWorks, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as User:CreativeWikiWorks, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

Article development
Standard layout
Lead section
The perfect article
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page. You can also type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Waqar💬 14:21, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Waqar,

May I hv your WhatsApp contact? Thank you. CreativeWikiWorks (talk) 08:10, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:CreativeWikiWorks

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. A tag has been placed on User:CreativeWikiWorks requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Waqar💬 14:21, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Need your assistants. Thank you. CreativeWikiWorks (talk) 08:11, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Vikram Dasgupta moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Vikram Dasgupta. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Wikishovel (talk) 14:44, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vikram Dasgupta (September 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Qcne was:

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please see the referencing tutorial at WP:INTREFVE

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Vikram Dasgupta and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Qcne (talk) 16:16, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, CreativeWikiWorks! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Qcne (talk) 16:16, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vikram Dasgupta (September 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Qcne was:

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

The comment the reviewer left was:

why did you re-submit with no changes?

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Vikram Dasgupta and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Qcne (talk) 16:26, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vikram Dasgupta (September 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Qcne was:

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

The comment the reviewer left was:

As I said previously we require in-line citations. This is mandatory. See WP:INTREFVE.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Vikram Dasgupta and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Qcne (talk) 18:57, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, CreativeWikiWorks,

Don't keep resubmitting the same draft over and over again without making major changes to it or the next time, it will be rejected which means you can not submit it any more. Take some time improving the article rather than resubmitting it or it will never be accepted. Our AFC reviewers' time is precious and it is a waste of their time to keep reviewing your draft when you haven't paid attention to their advice.

If you have questions, go to the AFC Help Desk which is linked in one of the messages above. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:20, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vikram Dasgupta (September 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Bonadea were:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

The comment the reviewer left was:

If this is resubmitted again without any attempt to address the reviewer comments, it will probably be rejected with no option to resubmit.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Vikram Dasgupta and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

bonadea contributions talk 20:35, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Bonadea.

Can you have a look at my draft. Thank you CreativeWikiWorks (talk) 11:33, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Scam warning

Hi @CreativeWikiWorks. I was in the Live Help IRC channel earlier, and you stated "In fact a 3rd party got info about this rejections and contacted offering services".

This is unfortunately a common scam. Do not pay for any editing services. Please report them by following the instructions at WP:SCAM. Qcne (talk) 17:45, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Vikram Dasgupta has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Vikram Dasgupta. Thanks! bonadea contributions talk 12:24, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

HI Bonadea,

Can you check my draft again before I resubmit. Thank you CreativeWikiWorks (talk) 12:18, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vikram Dasgupta (September 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Qcne was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

**Every single statement** must be sourced, starting with the date of birth. If no sources exist, please remove the statement.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Vikram Dasgupta and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Qcne (talk) 08:51, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please be specific which source isn't reliable enough? Thank you CreativeWikiWorks (talk) 09:36, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding File:Calcutta Taxi 01(Laurels) 007C.jpg

How were you able to gain the copyright to the underlying image that you made this image from? —C.Fred (talk) 21:32, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

And for that matter, how did you get the rights to the movie poster? —C.Fred (talk) 21:33, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

September 2024

Hello CreativeWikiWorks. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being employed (or being compensated in any way) by a person, group, company or organization to promote their interests. Paid advocacy on Wikipedia must be disclosed even if you have not specifically been asked to edit Wikipedia. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:CreativeWikiWorks. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=CreativeWikiWorks|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. 331dot (talk) 10:18, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I hv not receiving any payment for this! I am just started watching his films and wondering why there other with less credibility and awards that are on Wikipedia. Maybe you should check the rest before falsely accusing me! I could also question all the Wikipedians this same question, what's their interest? Self promotions? i.e. on their user pages...? CreativeWikiWorks (talk) 12:34, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your name sounds like that of a company that offers paid editing services and your edits have been about the same indivdual. You didn't pick them at random to edit about, how did you come to edit about them?

Please see other stuff exists; if there are "other with less credibility and awards"; please point those out so action can be taken. We need the help to identify inappropriate articles, this cannot justify adding more inappropriate articles. 331dot (talk) 12:40, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Canadian Newspaper & NZ are not reliable enough? CreativeWikiWorks (talk) 13:22, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please again have a look at Richie Mehta & Aditya Kripalani ... The list could go on.... How erer they approved? with comments citation neeeded...? - ignored "Or help extended the article..." ? CreativeWikiWorks (talk) 13:33, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That other articles exist does not mean that they were "approved" by anyone. There are many ways to get an article past reviewers; it could also be that these other articles were created in the past, long before current standards. 331dot (talk) 13:34, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You also claim to have the copyright to a movie poster, which suggests a relationship. If you have one, now is the time to be honest about it. 331dot (talk) 12:42, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I will make a list for this . I am still working on this as article as it keeps getting rejection for not being reliable sourced. Which for me is really confusing. I understand that there has to be notable and all. But I have linked so many sources and still insufficient? I am comparing with the other pages. The other individual in mind don't have the credentials as this person or already have a page. Sorry just my thoughts. Don't mean to be harsh. Thank you. CreativeWikiWorks (talk) 12:48, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I just want to see how to go about it as I tried to upload on Wikipedia commons but had to provide approval from owner. How would I even get that? CreativeWikiWorks (talk) 12:50, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You should not use other random articles as an example- these too could be inappropriate and just not yet addressed, and you would be unaware of this. If you want to use other articles as a model or example, use those that are classified as good articles, which have been checked by the community.

Movie posters cannot be uploaded to Commons. They can be uploaded to this Wikipedia locally under "fair use" rules, though that does carry some restrictions(like being unable to be used in a draft). If you are trying to put images in your draft, you don't need to worry about it until the draft is accepted- images are not relevant to the draft approval process, which only considers the text and sources.

It is doubtful that the makers of the film would want to release the poster for their film under a license compatible with Wikipedia(allowing for reuse by anyone for any purpose with attribution) as that would mean others could make money off of their work and they would not be entitled to a cut of it. But you could certainly try contacting the makers of the film.

Again, your name sounds like a company name. Is it? How did you come to edit about this person and their work? You didn't pick it at random. Again, now is the time to be honest about this. 331dot (talk) 12:57, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I did some research on and saw that there's is no page on him yet. Why? I have watched some of his movies long before this. I have researched all his movies recently. I have children who have similar interest and moved by his work. Again I repeat I am not getting any payment for this at all. You may contact him directly through his website info. if you don't believe me. Thank you. CreativeWikiWorks (talk) 13:18, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vikram Dasgupta (September 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AlphaBetaGamma was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Qcne's comment still stands.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Vikram Dasgupta and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

ABG (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 11:01, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

September 2024

Your account has been indefinitely blocked from editing because it has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. Also, your username gives the impression that the account represents a business, organisation, group, or web site, which is against the username policy.

If you intend to make useful contributions instead of promoting your business or organization, you may request unblock and a username change. In your reasons, you must follow all these steps:

Disclose any compensation you may receive for your contributions in accordance with the paid-contribution disclosure requirement; and
Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked; and
Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked; and
Provide a new username.

To do this, insert the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with your new username and replace the text "Your reason here" with your reasons to be unblocked.

Please note that the new username you choose cannot already be taken and in use by another account. You can search to see if the username you'd like to choose is available. If the search returns that no global account with that username exists, that means it is still available.

Appeals: If, after reviewing the guide to appealing blocks, you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal it by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your reason here" with the reasons you believe the block was an error, and publish the page. 331dot (talk) 13:26, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

CreativeWikiWorks (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

Bonita (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

I am not being paid. Just trying to be a volunteer and contribute, there's nothing to disclose if nothing was received for any advertising or promotional purposes. Just the fact I am new and following misleading Youtube videos about Wikipedia. Sorry for that. Thank you. If I can't get even 1 article out why should I try find others, there is a lot of research to do to comply

Decline reason:

One open unblock request at a time, please. You had two with contradictory username change requests. Additionally, you seem to think if you aren't directly paid for your edits, that means there's nothing to disclose. This is incorrect. Please reread WP:COI. Additionally, nothing here convinces me you understand why your submissions are being rejected. We don't want you continuing to waste the time of our reviewers so would need to clearly understand why, say, Draft:Vikram Dasgupta continues to be rejected. Yamla (talk) 19:42, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, Sorry for that. I forgot to check the availability of the first rename. My apologoies. CreativeWikiWorks (talk) 11:15, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

{{unblock-spamun|Bonitaz|I am not being paid. Just trying to be a volunteer and contribute, there's nothing to disclose if nothing was received for any advertising or promotional purposes. Just the fact I am new and following misleading Youtube videos about Wikipedia. Sorry for that. Thank you. If I can't get even 1 article out why should I try find others, there is a lot of research to do to comply.}

You are in error. You must disclose a conflict of interest whether paid or not. Additionally, any paid relationship with a topic(such as general marketing services or managing services) triggers the paid editing disclosure requirement, it does not require specific payment for edits or specific payment for promotional activities. Instead of trying to weasel out of disclosing, just be honest with us. 331dot (talk) 19:46, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you personally feel I am guilty then so be it. The only fact is just that I am of the same decent as he is & a fan of his work who thought he is notable enough and if that falls under COI then who am I to argue. Maybe it should hv gone to the filmmakers-Stub or taken over by someone else or even deleted (I don't know anymore). All I know it's been a good learning experience for me. I will leave at this as it is too much stress and inconvenience also for a lot of editors here too. I am truly Sorry for all the inconvenience caused. Best wishes. CreativeWikiWorks (talk) 11:33, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I received your email; I don't communicate via email unless highly sensitive personal information is involved. You may make a new request. 331dot (talk) 15:56, 13 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok Thank you 331dot CreativeWikiWorks (talk) 19:49, 14 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

CreativeWikiWorks (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

Ro55e5 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

As earlier mentioned I would like to request to be unblocked as I did not receive any paid contribution for the article as I am only a fan/friend of a fan/friend. This article has caused a lot of other 3rd parties to approach the person offering their services. Thanking you for understanding.

Decline reason:

From the above block notice, what you need to do is the following:

Disclose any compensation you may receive for your contributions in accordance with the paid-contribution disclosure requirement; and

Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked; and

Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked; and

Provide a new username.

You say you were not paid, and you've selected a new username, but that's only half of what was asked. El Beeblerino ^{if you're not into the whole brevity thing} 23:46, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Qcne, I see you were helping this editor on IRC, can I ask for your impression on this? -- asilvering (talk) 03:24, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you're only a "only a fan/friend of a fan/friend", how do you know that the article caused many people to request services? Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 01:49, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]