User talk:Crawnax
 | This user is new to Wikipedia. Please assume good faith, remain civil, and be calm, patient, helpful, and polite while they become accustomed to Wikipedia and its intricacies. |
Welcome Crawnax!
I'm Jax 0677, one of the other editors here, and I hope you decide to stay and help contribute to this amazing repository of knowledge.
| Some pages of helpful information to get you started: | Some common sense Dos and Don'ts:
|
| If you need further help, you can: | or you can: | or even: |
Alternatively, leave me a message at my talk page or type {{helpme}} here on your talk page, and someone will try to help.
There are many ways you can contribute to Wikipedia. Here are a few ideas:
|
|
Remember to always sign your posts on talk pages. You can do this either by clicking on the 
button on the edit toolbar or by typing four tildes ~~~~ at the end of your post. This will automatically insert your signature, a link to this (your talk) page, and a timestamp.
The best way to learn about something is to experience it. Explore, learn, contribute, and don't forget to have some fun!
{{My sandbox}} on your user page. By the way, seeing as you haven't created a user page yet, simply click here to start it.Sincerely, Jax 0677 (talk) 18:18, 17 August 2017 (UTC) (Leave me a message)
August 2017
[edit]
Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.
When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:
Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)
Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.
Edit summary content is visible in:
Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → 
Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary.
Thanks! 220 of Borg 05:15, 18 August 2017 (UTC)
You are suspected of sockpuppetry and set to be banned from Wikipedia
[edit]Your account has been added to this list of The abominable Wiki troll (TAWT) sockpuppets. In other words, a senior user has determined that you are the person behind TAWT, an appalling farm of over 300 vandal accounts dating back to 2007. The punishment for this is an irreversible block of your account and permanent ostracizing from Wikipedia, so you should defend yourself at the link provided before it's too late. Cheers. 2A02:C7F:8E0C:6600:2419:1AC9:981A:F0E6 (talk) 10:01, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Absolution (professional wrestling)
[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Absolution (professional wrestling) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 02:46, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
The article Absolution (professional wrestling) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Doesn't meet WP:GNG. WP:TOOSOON.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Nikki♥311 02:57, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
Nomination of Absolution (professional wrestling) for deletion
[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Absolution (professional wrestling) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Absolution (professional wrestling) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Nikki♥311 03:04, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of WrestleMania Women's Battle Royal
[edit]If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on WrestleMania Women's Battle Royal requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. HC7 (talk) 18:35, 16 March 2018 (UTC)
April 2018
[edit]
Hello, I'm NotTheFakeJTP. I noticed that you made a comment on the page WrestleMania 34 that didn't seem very civil, so it has been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. This template isn't worded correctly for the situation, but try not to insult other editors. JTP (talk • contribs) 02:08, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Wrestlemania 34
[edit]You need to review WP:CRYSTAL. It is common for matches to begin as though they are handicap matches, but the person taken out rejoins restoring the originally announced match. You did jump the gun against the rules of crystal balling. You need to wait for the match to finish for confirmation. Making predictions as you were is not acceptable. Please review the rule and WP:CIVIL per your most recent edit summary. You are new and you should listen to more experienced editors. BerleT (talk) 02:08, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
April 2018
[edit]
This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at WrestleMania 34, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. BerleT (talk) 07:21, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Greatest Royal Rumble
[edit]Please source your edits in future, and don't insult people, thanks. Corabal (talk) 20:25, 12 April 2018 (UTC)
April 2018
[edit]
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add defamatory content, as you did at Bill Cosby, you may be blocked from editing. Natureium (talk) 18:20, 26 April 2018 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add defamatory content, as you did at Bill Cosby. Natureium (talk) 18:24, 26 April 2018 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Bill Cosby. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:
- Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. — Javert2113 (talk) 18:28, 26 April 2018 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Jauerbackdude?/dude. 18:28, 26 April 2018 (UTC)Katarina Leigh
[edit]Don’t remove important information which is notiable TheKinkdomMan talk 21:37, 27 April 2018 (UTC)
April 2018
[edit]
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Katarina Leigh Waters. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. If I warn you again and you revert again I will report you for removing cited reliable sources and you will be blocked permanently, do not remove reliable information TheKinkdomMan talk 02:28, 28 April 2018 (UTC)
Hi Crawnax, Greetings to you. I have reverted you edit on the above page as no future bout should be recorded as per WikiProject MMA guidelines. Let me know if anything else I could clarify or help. Have a good day. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 05:15, 16 May 2018 (UTC)
Regarding your Fallout (series) revisions
[edit]
Regarding your recent revisions on Fallout (series),[1][2] Fallout: New Vegas is commonly considered a main-series game, not a spin-off, in the Fallout series. If you disagree with that, please discuss it on the article’s talk page rather than move the section as you did. If Wikipedia starts to consider Fallout: New Vegas a spin-off, more pages than just Fallout (series) would have to be edited. Interqwark talk contribs 14:23, 9 June 2018 (UTC)
Notice
[edit]
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Requesting indefinite block of User:Crawnax. NeilN talk to me 01:35, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
October 2018
[edit] Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Joe Manchin. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. power~enwiki (π, ν) 22:29, 5 October 2018 (UTC)
You are dangerously close to an indefinite block. The edit referenced above was naked vandalism. This notice should be understood as a Final Warning. -Ad Orientem (talk) 15:02, 6 October 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]
Hello, Crawnax. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Crawnax. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Welcome to the Pro Wrestling WikiProject!
[edit]- Welcome!
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! I noticed that you edited a professional wrestling related article. Wikipedia has a professional wrestling WikiProject, which aims to improve all professional wrestling related articles. You are free to join or can explore what the project is about by clicking here. Here are some other good links to help you get started with Wikipedia:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! ImmortalWizard(chat) 11:53, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
An article you recently created, Show vote, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DannyS712 (talk) 02:24, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Show vote (January 6)
[edit]
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Show vote and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Show vote, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
- You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
|
Hello, Crawnax!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 14:31, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
|
January 2019
[edit] Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at David Cameron. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. 72 (talk) 12:28, 22 January 2019 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at David Cameron. That was a completely inappropriate edit. You have been repeatedly warned about doing this before. Any additional vandalism will result in a block. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 16:05, 22 January 2019 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Jauerbackdude?/dude. 16:59, 22 January 2019 (UTC)Your draft article, Draft:Show vote
[edit]
Hello, Crawnax. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Show vote".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Lapablo (talk) 19:18, 7 July 2019 (UTC)