Jump to content

User talk:Copystar

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

hello, I was in Nelsons class doing the project and I also asked you to help me find ww1 books, I know i have bugged you a lot, but i was just wondering why i can't see my page unless i got to my contributions. It says in there that someone has done stuff like change my title from weapons of world war one, to weapons of world war 1, but everytime i try to get on to it, i can't. Just wondering if you could help thank you!

Your article has been moved to AfC space

[edit]

Hi! I would like to inform you that the Articles for Creation submission which was previously located here: User:Copystar/Persons day has been moved to Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Persons day, this move was made automatically and doesn't affect your article, if you have any questions please ask on my talk page! Have a nice day. ArticlesForCreationBot (talk) 22:12, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

[edit]
Persons day, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
  • The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see what needs to be done to bring it to the next level.
  • Please continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request.
  • If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping Wikipedia!

mabdul 22:15, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please see Talk:Persons day#Questionable notability. --Skeezix1000 (talk) 19:03, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

[edit]
The Christianity Barnstar
Dear Copystar, I award you The Christianity Barnstar for all of your contributions to WikiProject Christianity, especially your recent additions to the list of Methodist churches. You are making a difference here! Keep up the good work! With regards, AnupamTalk 01:22, 18 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Material you included in the above article appears to have been copied from the copyright web page http://openstudio.ca/printopolis-publication-now-available/. Copying text directly from a source is a copyright violation. Unfortunately, for copyright reasons, the content had to be removed. Please leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions or if you think I made a mistake. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 21:24, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Tara Cooper

[edit]

Hello Copystar,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Tara Cooper for deletion, because it seems to be copied from another source, probably infringing copyright.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to rewrite it in your own words, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Robert G. (talk) 06:52, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Tara Cooper

[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Tara Cooper requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://uwaterloo.ca/fine-arts/about/people/faculty/tara-cooper/tara-cooper-curriculum-vitae. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Robert G. (talk) 06:54, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

About the above messages regarding copyright violations, you may wish to visit the discussion here.  Seagull123  Φ  19:16, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (November 13)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was:
This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Please note IMDB is not considered a reliable source.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Sulfurboy (talk) 20:48, 13 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Teahouse logo
Hello! Copystar, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Sulfurboy (talk) 20:48, 13 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Copy paste from Draft to Mainspace

[edit]

You shouldn't copy-paste content from Draft into Mainspace as was done with Draft:Tom Longboat Award -> Tom Longboat Awards. The article history makes it look like you are the sole and original author of the content, and not User:Brandsant22 who actually wrote most of the article. You should notify on the talk page who the original author was. -- GreenC 15:33, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I understand and I certainly did not intend to take credit from User:Brandsant22 who I very much recognize did a great deal of work in setting up the table of the original article. However, there is some additional context that you would not have known which is that I also did considerable work within and using User:Brandsant22 sandbox during a Wikipedia Editathon dedicated Elite Aboriginal Athletes that we were both working on. I recognize that this is also not proper Wikipedia protocol but at the time we was unclear how to handover the work from one user's Sandbox to another. That all being said, I will take your suggestion and give User:Brandsant22 his due on the talk page. Copystar (talk) 15:40, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red's April+Further with Art+Feminism 2018

[edit]
Please join us as Women in Red and Art+Feminism continue our collaboration in April 2018. Continue the work you've done in March and pledge to help close the gender gap in April! All you need to do is sign up on the Meet-Up page below and list any articles you create in the month of April.


April+Further with Art+Feminism

To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list or Women in Red/international list. To unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list. Follow us on Twitter: @wikiwomeninred

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Polish-Canadian Business and Professional Association of Windsor (May 22)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:
This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
This draft does not establish notability. This organization appears to be of local interest.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Robert McClenon (talk) 02:00, 22 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use of File:Sttomlogo.PNG

[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:Sttomlogo.PNG. However, there is a concern that the use of the image on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. Details of this problem, and which specific criteria that the image may not meet, can be obtained by going to the image description page. If you feel that this image does meet those criteria, please place a note on the image description or talk page explaining why. Do not remove the {{di-fails NFCC}} tag itself.

An administrator will review this file within a few days, and having considered the opinions placed on the image page, may delete it in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion or remove the tag entirely. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 16:57, 19 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Sttomlogo.PNG

[edit]
⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Sttomlogo.PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:36, 23 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

August and New Achievements at Women in Red

[edit]

Meetups #87, #88, #89, #90

[edit]
An exciting new month for Women in Red!


August 2018 worldwide online editathons:
New: Indigenous women Women of marginalized populations Women writers Geofocus: Bottom 10
Continuing: #1day1woman Global Initiative
Notable women, broadly-construed!


For the first time, this month we are trying out our Monthly achievement initiative

  • All creators of new biographies can keep track of their progress and earn virtual awards.
  • It can be used in conjunction with the above editathons or for any women's biography created in August.
  • Try it out when you create your first biography of the month.

Latest headlines, news, and views on the Women in Red talkpage (Join the conversation!):

(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list)


--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 17:33, 19 July 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Women in Red April Events

[edit]
April 2019, Volume 5, Issue 4, Numbers 107, 108, 114, 115, 116, 117


Hello and welcome to the April events of Women in Red!

Please join us for these virtual events:


Other ways you can participate:


Subscription options: Opt-in (EN-WP) / Opt-in (international) / Unsubscribe

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 20:33, 22 March 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:St. Thomas Public Library

[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:St. Thomas Public Library requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://stthomaspubliclibrary.ca/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/STPL-history-timeline-june-2018.pdf. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. S Philbrick(Talk) 17:38, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I've also deleted another version of the same content at User talk:St. Thomas Public Library, for the same reason. I also found evidence of copying in Helen Waimel Robertson, and have blanked that and listed it at WP:Copyright problems for investigation. You are welcome to rewrite it without the copied content (ask here if you don't see how to find the special temporary page to do that on). Just for the avoidance of any doubt: with a few very rare exceptions, everything you write here must be entirely in your own words; you can freely use the facts, ideas and concepts of the sources, but the actual form of expression, the language used, must be entirely your own. If any aspect of this is not clear to you, do please ask (here is fine) for clarification. Regards, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 18:41, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Moved from my talk.
 – Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 12:34, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Hello. You marked the article, Helen Waimel Robertson as a potential source of copyright infringement. The article was already reviewed by editor, Vexations. When I compare my original entry (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Helen_Waimel_Robertson&oldid=832243793) with the page http://cwahi.concordia.ca/sources/artists/displayArtist.php?ID_artist=5558, I do not see "copyvio blanking, foundational copying" that you see. I rewrote the text and supplemented the material with additional references. Can you please explain where you see the copyright violation so I can correct it? Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Copystar (talk • contribs) 01:46, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Copystar, please see this comparison, where similar phrases are highlighted in red; some of the apparent overlap is caused by proper names – but not all. If you like, you can work on a rewrite [1]; otherwise I will clean up the page in due course. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 12:34, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Moved from my talk
 – Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 13:07, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Thanks for getting back to me re: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Copystar#March_2019. When you run the text compare, it suggests that the violation is unlikely. https://tools.wmflabs.org/copyvios/?lang=en&project=wikipedia&title=&oldid=832243793&action=search&use_engine=1&use_links=1&turnitin=0 So I don't know why why the article was flagged for violation. I don't believe there is any copyright violation here. What is the best way to have the text restored? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Copystar (talk • contribs) 12:51, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The "unlikely" is based on the percentage of overlap found by the tool; the problem is in the phrases and sentences highlighted in red. As I said above, you can either rewrite it on the special temporary page, or I or someone else will deal with it in due course; if you'd like that to be someone other than me (for a second opinion), I'll hold back – your call! If you have more questions, please ask them here on this page, so as to keep all the conversation in one place. You can sign your talk-page posts by adding four tildes (~~~~) to them. Thanks, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 13:07, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

March 2019

[edit]

Information icon Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Kali Spitzer, from its old location at User:Copystar/Kali Spitzer. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. -Liancetalk/contribs 21:03, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kali Spitzer has been accepted

[edit]
Kali Spitzer, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Praxidicae (talk) 22:44, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:12, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Copystar&oldid=1258263864"