User talk:ConfluencePM

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Introduction.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! APerson241 (talk) 02:32, 20 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

In response to the message you left on my talk page

You can fix the page title by moving it to a new page with the title you want. I do believe that the reason you cited was why the page was titled "Introduction"; however, I am not completely sure of this and you should check out the Wikipedia IRC help channel and ask them.

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Confluence Project Management.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! APerson241 (talk) 16:23, 20 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Confluence Project Management.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Jamesx12345 (talk) 12:50, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of interest

Please see Wikipedia:Plain and simple conflict of interest guide regarding Confluence Project Management. Many thanks. Jamesx12345 (talk) 12:52, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Confluence Project Management, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

RadioFan (talk) 19:23, 6 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your account has been blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia because it appears to be mainly intended for publicity and/or promotional purposes. If you intend to edit constructively in other topic areas, you may be granted the right to continue under a change of username. Please read the following carefully.

Why can't I edit Wikipedia?

Your account's edits and/or username indicate that it is being used on behalf of a company, group, website or organization for purposes of promotion and/or publicity. The edits may have violated one or more of our rules on spamming, which include: adding inappropriate external links, posting advertisements and using Wikipedia for promotion. Wikipedia has many articles on companies, groups, and organizations, but such groups are generally discouraged from using Wikipedia to write about themselves. In addition, usernames like yours are disallowed under our username policy.

Am I allowed to make these edits if I change my username?

Probably not, although if you can demonstrate a pattern of future editing in strict accordance with our neutral point of view policy, you may be granted this right. See Wikipedia's FAQ for Organizations for a helpful list of frequently asked questions by people in your position. Also, review the conflict of interest guidance to see the kinds of limitations you would have to obey if you did want to continue editing about your company, group, organization, or clients. If this does not fit in with your goals, then you will not be allowed to edit Wikipedia again.

What can I do now?

If you have no interest in writing about some other topic than your organization, group, company, or product, you may consider using one of the many websites that allow this instead.

If you do intend to make useful contributions here about some other topic, you must convince a Wikipedia administrator that you mean it. To that end, please do the following:

Add the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} on your user talk page.
Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:Listusers to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy.
Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In this reason, you must:
- Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the edits for which you were blocked.
- Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

--Orange Mike | Talk 12:24, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ConfluencePM (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The format and tone of the Confluence Project Management article has been written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article and from a neutral point of view as per the advice of Wikipedia's administrators in the past. To ensure compliance, I revised the article in a similar fashion as other companies (in the same industry )on Wikipedia - this included the change in tone, adopting a neutral point of view attitude and adding links from "independent reliable sources" to verify the company’s existence. The article went live following the amendments but in an attempt to "de-orphan" the article, categories were added (again, this was done using an existing company on Wikipedia as a guide). These are factual categories - "Companies based in Singapore", "Companies established in the 1990s", "International project management firms" - that are neutral in nature and not at all intended for publicity/or promotional purposes. As for the username policy, I will amend accordingly but would you be able to elaborate further on the other errors I may have made? Obviously this will help me understand where the errors were in order to edit the article constructively without violating any more Wikipedia rules and policies. Thank you.

Decline reason:

Procedural decline. Could you please make this request again using this unblock template {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}}. We cannot consider an unblock request without a proposed new username as your current username represents a company or group. Jezebel'sPonyo ^{bons mots} 16:41, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

ConfluencePM (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

TMoon (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

The format and tone of the Confluence Project Management article has been written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article and from a neutral point of view as per the advice of Wikipedia's administrators in the past. To ensure compliance, I revised the article in a similar fashion as other companies (in the same industry )on Wikipedia - this included the change in tone, adopting a neutral point of view attitude and adding links from "independent reliable sources" to verify the company’s existence. The article went live following the amendments but in an attempt to "de-orphan" the article, categories were added (again, this was done using an existing company on Wikipedia as a guide). These are factual categories - "Companies based in Singapore", "Companies established in the 1990s", "International project management firms" - that are neutral in nature and not at all intended for publicity/or promotional purposes. As for the username policy, I will amend accordingly but would you be able to elaborate further on the other errors I may have made? Obviously this will help me understand where the errors were in order to edit the article constructively without violating any more Wikipedia rules and policies. Thank you.

Decline reason:

The username chosen has been registered since 2006. In addition, your reasoning runs contrary to the reason for your block, and the key questions below. You may submit a new WP:GAB-compliant request with a different proposed username, and one that adderesses the 3 key questions below. Note also: just because an article exists for a similar company, it does not mean one can for yours it must be notable in its own right. However, you cannot be the one to create it (✉→BWilkins←✎) 16:46, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Here are a few key questions:

Do you understand that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, and not a business directory?
Do you understand conflict of interest?
Do you understand that to be considered for an encyclopedia article, the subject must be notable?

You are currently blocked because your username appears directly related to a company, group or product that you have been promoting, contrary to the username policy. Changing the username will not allow you to violate the 3 important principles above. Daniel Case (talk) 02:35, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Confluence Project Management (company) concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Confluence Project Management (company), a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:07, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Confluence Project Management (company)

Hello ConfluencePM. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Confluence Project Management (company)".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Confluence Project Management (company)}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 20:02, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Confluence Project Management for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Confluence Project Management is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Confluence Project Management until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Guy (help!) 21:32, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]