User talk:Colemannick
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Institute of Information Security Professionals, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.sapphire.net/partners/iisp.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.
This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot 18:23, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Institute of information security professionals, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.instisp.org. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.
This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot 18:48, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of Institute of information security professionals
[edit]
A tag has been placed on Institute of information security professionals requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for web content.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Qst 18:48, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
November 2007
[edit]
This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you create an inappropriate page, such as Institute of information security professionals, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 18:48, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
{{hangon}} Institute of Information Security Professionals own the copyright not sapphire. They have borrowed the words with our permission from us.
- It's irrelevant. This article is not an encyclopedia article; it is an advertisement; even if you did have the legal power to fully release this text under the GFDL (you haven't done that, and you should make sure you understand what it entails before you offer to do it), it wouldn't matter, because it's not written in an appropriate encyclopedic tone. In addition to that, as a representative of this company, it isn't appropriate for you to create an article about it, because that is against the conflict of interest guideline. Third, it isn't clear whether- or how- this organization meets the notability criteria. If this really is a notable company, someone who doesn't work for it will inevitably create an article, but please, don't recreate the article until you have carefully read WP:COPYRIGHT, WP:ORG, WP:NPOV, and WP:COI, all of which you are currently not in compliance with. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 18:56, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
- You left a message on my talk page, but I don't see what more I can add than how FisherQueen explained matters to you. — Coren (talk) 19:39, 9 November 2007 (UTC)