User talk:Cogni iitr

Please refrain from hijacking pages as you did with Cognizance. Should you believe the subject you were writing about deserves an article, please use the Article Wizard, which has an option to create a draft version that you can then get feedback on. Also see Wikipedia's disambiguation guideline which indicates how to handle separate subjects with similar names. If you continue to hijack an existing article, you may be blocked from editing. If you have any questions, you are always welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. Leschnei (talk) 22:57, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your account has been indefinitely blocked from editing because it has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. Also, your username gives the impression that the account represents a business, organisation, group, or website, which is against the username policy.

If you intend to make useful contributions instead of promoting your business or organization, you may request unblock and a username change. In your reasons, you must follow all these steps:

Disclose any compensation you may receive for your contributions in accordance with the paid-contribution disclosure requirement; and
Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked; and
Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked; and
Provide a new username.

To do this, insert the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with your new username and replace the text "Your reason here" with your reasons to be unblocked.

Please note that the new username you choose cannot already be taken and in use by another account. You can search to see if the username you'd like to choose is available. If the search returns that no global account with that username exists, that means it is still available.

Appeals: If, after reviewing the guide to appealing blocks, you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal it by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your reason here" with the reasons you believe the block was an error, and publish the page. Alexf^(talk) 16:44, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Cogni iitr (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

fivestrokes (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

I realize the mistake that I have made, I was not properly and thoroughly aware of the strict Rules and Guidelines of Wikipedia. I assure you to never repeat the action which led to my account being blocked again. Kindly unblock my account.

Decline reason:

Duplicate request. PhilKnight (talk) 16:09, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Cogni iitr (talk) 17:39, 19 December 2024 (UTC)

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Cogni iitr (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

fivestrokes (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

I have not received any compensation of any kind for my contributions, I am merely a student. As I have already mentioned I understand the reason I have been blocked and will never repeat such actions. I wish to make Wikipedia more up to date with the knowledge that I wish to share with the world. So, it is my humble request to kindly UNBLOCK my account.

Decline reason:

You still need to describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked. In addition, although not paid, you seem to have a conflict of interest, and you should carefully read WP:COI. PhilKnight (talk) 16:13, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

UTRS appeal #98164

is in progress. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 18:35, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sending user back here. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:20, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like WP:Sock puppetry as ThePrince811 (talk · contribs). Please compare edits. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:24, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Deepfriedokra I'd call those likely. Also PR Support Cognizance (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki) which is confirmed to Cogni. Izno (talk) 18:39, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, @Izno: -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 18:42, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]