User talk:Closedmouth/Archive 1
 | This is an archive of past discussions with User:Closedmouth. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | → | Archive 5 |
Thanks
Thanks for tagging my comment. I was too confused over the article to notice I didn't. -- TKE
2,2'-Bipyridine (data page)
Why did you delete this page? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Shniken (talk • contribs).
Smile
Connell66 has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
As I'm sure you know, user templates are opinions shared by several members of Wikipedia. They are templates employed on individual user pages only, and do not claim to represent the official shared position of the Wikipedia collective. Still, some self-appointed dictators feel it is their responsibility to control individual expression on user pages. Template:User-AmE-0, for example, was deleted by User:Kelly Martin; after being recreated, it was tagged for deletion by User:DreamGuy and its category removed by User:Carbonite. There are but a few people who want to control personal expression on user pages at Wikipedia and hundreds of us who do not want these few to succeed. In standing together to revert tyranny, despotism and censorship of individual expression on our personal pages, we can easily overcome these dictator-wanna-bees. Wikipedia can be for the people. Please help us oppose those in the Arbitration Committee Elections who would turn Wikipedia into a dictatorship of controlled articles and user pages: Kelly Martin, Jpgordon, Fred Bauder, James F., Jayjg, and Mindspillage.
If you feel passionately about this, you can join us in alerting other users of these individual tags, that their personal expression on their user pages is being censored by people like User: Carbonite. To help, just go to any of the templates that User:Carbonite has tried to change, and alert the people in those categories that they are not alone in their outrage and opposition. --لæmäļ al diη 22:00, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
Good work on the Infobox. However, Oliver Stone was not the farmer. Hank Azaria was.--Jnelson09 00:06, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
Why are you vandalizing this user's page? Also, please to not personally attack users in your edit summaries. Thanks. --Shanel 01:38, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
- Alright. Just don't let it happen again, okay. :)--Shanel 01:44, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
FPM image
Thanks for the head's up. I'll look into fixing it.--み使い Mitsukai 04:15, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
Thank you for your recent comment on the AfD discussion page for this article at Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Heidi_Choat, advocating that the article be kept on Wikipedia. Your time and interest is much appreciated. The outcome of the discussion was that AfD tag was removed and the article was kept, so thank you for your part in assisting this outcome! --SilverWings 21:41, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
thank god you're here
thx for the episode rundown, I fixed it up a bit, fingers-crossed it won't get reverted again :) --bdude 09:15, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
Commons account
commons:User:Closedmouth is me. --Closedmouth 11:58, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
Shortpages
This is an FYI. If you already know of what I'm about to mention, then this post will be worthless to you. :) I see you working at short pages cleanup. It's always great to have more people doing so. I wanted to let you know about the daily bot-parsed version of the list. It's availible at User:Zorglbot/Shortpages. It's not perfect, but it is very useful to be able to glance at the parsed list and see what has already been worked on, and what still needs work each day. - TexasAndroid 16:22, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
RFD Nominations
You tagged Microsoft fonts & Microsoft typefaces with {{rfd}}. However, redirect deletion nominations are a two step process and you did not complete the second step. Could you please follow step two and list them at WP:RFD? Thanks. -- JLaTondre 13:28, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
- Sorry! I was going through Category:Redirects for deletion looking for incomplete nominations as it happens frequently. I didn't pay attention to the time of your nomination edits. Didn't mean to be a pest... Thanks. -- JLaTondre 13:33, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
Thanks
Thanks for sorting out the complete mess I made of merging String stop - God knows what I did to the redirect/edit summary!
Cheers –MDCollins (talk) 14:38, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
Dr Goudsmit
I've asked the guy who wrote the article to fill in the missing pieces. But it was clearly not really a speedy, and another ed. changed it. --I do not myself see how N can be more clearly asserted. DGG 04:45, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
This user has been redirecting pages with little explanation. He recently destroyed all of the Code Lyoko episode articles. Angie Y. 20:10, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
Please delete this page, I thought that had been done long ago as it was an editing exercise only and was not intended to stay up. There is an editor's page already. Just saw your message- what is the proper way to remove a page? Saw it- thanks- good to know about the process. Bzuk 14:33, 13 May 2007 (UTC).
Can I ask you why you reverted this to the redirect? This redirect does seem to be a hoax to publicize someone's joke Bebo site. Demiurge 15:14, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for fixing that. It was not intentional to leave the page blank, but I didn't feel that the song, which was simply performed on TV once, warranted an entire article. It also contained false information when I deleted it, stating that it was the 2nd single from My December, which is completely untrue. Being that it wasn't a single or a very necessary inclusion in Wikipedia at all (not to mention that it isn't even a Kelly Clarkson song, but a cover), I thought removing the information from the article deleted the article; I'm not really familiar with wikipedia's entire workings yet. So what you stated was "removing information...without good reason," to me, had a perfectly legitimate reason. I don't need to use the sandbox to figure that out, because I wasn't just fooling around--but thanks anyway. It was simply an issue of me not knowing about the page deletion procedure (which I subsequently researched, don't worry). But thanks again, because at least the article is accurate now. NickL1185 19:37, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
Jeffrey Wells
Why are you redirecting Jeffrey Wells to Richard Goldberg? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 70.112.29.66 (talk) 03:56, 14 May 2007 (UTC).
List of Plácido Domingo's recordings
Why are u directing the page? I want that page to be removed since I dont think that it is an appropriate title and thts why I requested it to be deleted. The whole contents have been moved as per remarks in the talk page. - Jay 12:20, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
Thanks
Thanks for the quick cleanup to my previous edit of Ed Kavalee --Mikecraig 04:48, 4 June 2007 (UTC).
Thanks
Thanks for fixing Leaky! I didn't know the correct technique for this kind of situation. Jpaulm 14:27, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
Discrete choice analysis
Why did you put a "prod" template on discrete choice analysis? If a stub article is only a definition but is on a topic that can OBVIOUSLY grow FAR beyond a definition, and any reasonable account of it would REQUIRE far more than just the defintion, then it should not be deleted on the grounds that it belongs in Wiktionary. This is a very clear-cut case of that situation. Michael Hardy 18:12, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
speedy delete
Whoa there mister. You chose to speedy delete a page that was just created? WHY? Slow down there. — BQZip01 — talk 00:01, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
- But I had to retype it...Why was it deleted in the first place? I just don't want it deleted again. — BQZip01 — talk 04:47, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
Cahuella thanks
I spent ages trying to figure out how to make the link to hamadryads make sense without the brackets- thanks for showing a newbie how it's done! considerable~powers 16:41, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
Andrew Peterson Soccer Notability
Can you revisit Andrew Peterson's soccer page and remove your notability comments. Thank you. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Rogerp9 (talk • contribs).
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 16:11, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
NOELLE TRONGONE
Why are you trying to speedy delete this article? I am still working on it now. Noelle is a remarkable young woman. Just because YOU are unfamiliar with her does not mean that she is unremarkable. Why don't you let me finish writing the article? She is a well known Slovenian-American actress, model, recording artist, and entrepreneur. - Paulus89 08:28, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
I'm curious: don't you need to list this redirect on RfD as per step II in order for it to be discussed? --Mark H Wilkinson (t, c) 23:57, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
- Right, I've listed it, just in case. --Mark H Wilkinson (t, c) 07:12, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 16:48, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
Uh...
I don't understand why NarutoXcentraL should be speedily deleted. Other websites have pages, why can't that one? Crüsäder 16:05, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
WaterWinterWonderland.com
Any reason why you had my entry removed for WaterWinterWonderland.com? The site is notable in that it is the most comprehensive site of its kind. Echosyst 19:36, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
Gabriele Homey
Can you categorically prove that Gabriele Homey is the legal name of Begum Inaara Aga Khan? i.e. can you provide a copy of birth certificate stating the name "Gabriele Homey"?—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 213.165.224.166 (talk • contribs).
- What we find on google doesnt mean it is the gospel truth, nor can it be taken as a fact. Unless, you can prove otherwise, I suggest it should be left out to save the legal spat with lawyers. According to her foundation, her name is Gabriele Thyssen prior to marriage to the Aga Khan.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 213.165.224.166 (talk • contribs).
Underpants Gnomes
Thanks for your spacing help earlier Rankun 09:04, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
Barn Star
|
The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | |
| I hereby award Closedmouth this barnstar, in recognition of their efforts for fighting vandals on wikipedia. KerotanTalk Have a nice day :) 08:14, 10 August 2007 (UTC) |
Raytown High School
If you would have given me more time, I am going to be starting a full article for Raytown Senior High School. This is the reason I removed the damn redirect you seem to want to keep on it. Please be patient and allow me more than an hour to get something up. Or worse yet, just leave it alone -- is that so hard? -- NeelyCrenshaw 19:22, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
RE:August 2007
I notice you gave me this warning but did not post one for the user who I was engaged in a so-called "edit war" with. I find this strange, considering that we made equal amounts of revisions on this topic. Why is that? You may not agree with my edits, but do not single me out when I am simply one side of a two-sided debate. If you are going to issue warings I suggest you be a bit more fair and evenhanded. Thank you
--Qwerty7412369 00:55, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
Also, I found your response on the article's discussion page quite unconvincing. I don't need to get your or anyone else's permission before I make edits, and for you to suggest otherwise is quite against what Wikipedia, "the free encyclopedia anyone can edit," stands for --Qwerty7412369 01:08, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
Bradford (Park Avenue)
Why was this page moved? The name was correct. The team name is Bradford but (Park Avenue) is almost always added to distinguish the team from the better known Bradford City. The brackets are necessary because Bradford Park Avenue is not the name of the team.GordyB 11:39, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
- Yes, my bad. You had in fact just moved the talk page across to the new name following a move by somebody else. Sorry.GordyB 15:53, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
Anthony Wilson (guitarist)
I don't disagree that this article should be deleted. I put it there to see if nybody would expand the article, to see if he was note worthy enough to be on wikipedia. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Franz-kafka (talk • contribs).
Random Smile!
WarthogDemon has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
-WarthogDemon 02:50, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for reverting
Thanks for reverting the personal attack on my talk page. ... discospinster talk 14:55, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
- Quite welcome :) --Closedmouth 14:58, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
User Adoption
Hi, my username is Ericthebrainiac and I just want to know if you can adopt me on Wikipedia. The reason that I ask this question is because I don't want to be a vandal.Ericthebrainiac 20:30, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
Request for assistance
As someone with whom I have reviewed or worked with on an article or talk page, I humbly request your assistance in reviewing the Aggie Bonfire page for Featured Article status. Any/all constructive input is welcomed and appreciated on the FAC nomination page, but please read the instructions for reviewing before you make a comment. Thanks in advance for your assistance. — BQZip01 — talk 05:36, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
NOTICE
NOTICE: I had moved all information on CKPT (AM) to CKPT-FM. The CKPT radio station had moved from 1420 AM to 99.3 FM on August 21st, 2007 and will simlucast their new FM signal on their old 1420 AM frequency, until it's turned off. I also want to make out that I TOTALLY forgot about the "move article" to a new article name method. Again, the old CKPT (AM) article is now at CKPT-FM. Thanks!—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Webfan29 (talk • contribs).
Robert Burton (cricketer)
Your reversion by automated popup of this redirect is wrong. Robert Claude Burton, known as Claude, was the brother of David Cecil Fowler Burton, known as Cecil. In that Claude Burton played first-class cricket (as well as Cecil) then Claude will get an article of his own in time but should be shown on the List of Yorkshire CCC players for the time being as a redlink, not redirecting to Cecil. Do you want to undo your own change, or shall I? Johnlp 07:38, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
Thanks
for reverting my userpage. Keep up your great anti-vandalism work, and have a nice weekend! Best, PeaceNT 12:15, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
- :) --Closedmouth 12:18, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
I'd like to give you a cake, and thanks again for beating me in reverting my own page =) PeaceNT 12:26, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
Not a Problem
Vandal squashers gotta stick together :-) Bullzeye (Complaint Dept./Brilliant Acts) 12:42, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
I blanked the Centerville, Illinois on purpose and it is not vandalism. There is a Centerville, Illinois in Piatt County, Illinois and there is a Centreville, Illinois in St. Clair County. They are not the same town nor should be the same page. Please look into a person's edits before giving them a warning. Once again I will blank the Centerville, Illinois as it should not redirect to the Centreville, Illinois page. Thanks! Kkemper 20:44, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
WP:CSD#R1 does not apply here. The redirect's target exists. Cheers. --MZMcBride 04:51, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
- Yeah, that was it. I had checked the creation dates of both articles, but failed to realize that the articles had been restored after having been deleted. My apologies. Cheers. --MZMcBride 17:29, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
Hi. I'm contacting some people who have worked on the Rational Response Squad article because someone changed my redirect of "Brian Sapient" (which I made to redirect surfers to the RRS article) into an article on Brian Sapient himself. I'm not sure one is merited, particularly given what that editor started off with the article, and have begun a discussion on that new article's Talk Page. Your input would be appreciated. Nightscream 01:45, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
Maddie Fitzpatrick redirect
One problem: She is not listed on the The Suite Life of Zack & Cody recurring characters, so I'm not certain why the redirection took place. WAVY 10 19:02, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
Requesting speedy deletion
Trying to make friends this way? -- Matthead discuß! O 07:13, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
You rock Closemouth
I salute you and think you deserve the highest respect. Thanks for such a quick response. All you vandals, beware of Closemouth. I would award all of the Rickk Barstarsor any wikipedia award to you if I knew how. Arsenal15 14:24, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
Arsenal15 has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
Arsenal15 14:52, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
Safia Aoude
In order to defeat the "deletionists" would you be prepared to keep Safia Aoude's article?Phase4 10:50, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
Sharpe’s Regiment (novel)
Sharpe's Regiment has now been moved to Sharpe’s Regiment (novel) to disambiguate with the TV programme of the same name and for consistency with the remainder of the series. I removed the redirect because it was redirecting to itself (unless I've missed something distinguishing between two otherwise identical pages). I'm not quite sure how to go about safely having the redirect page deleted without jeopardizing the main article page. Any help would be appreciated. Cheers. AusTerrapin 12:00, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
Broken Redirects
Are you experiencing problems with some of the links on Broken Redirects, like I am? - BANG! 00:26, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
- For example, I go to the main page when I click on the link to "ANG_KABANALBANALAN" (which I db'd by using whatlinkshere on the target page). - BANG! 00:33, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
Rock and Roll, Hoochie Koo
This was a non-page, arguably undeserving of bandwidth. I moved the content to its parent. OK, I forgot to add the redirect to the parent. It's no big deal. --Rodhullandemu 04:21, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
- Redirect now added --Rodhullandemu 04:28, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
Alli Joseph
What is your reasoning regarding this edit? Do you really think that it needs a "discussion" or is some automated bot of yours that needs some fine tuning?--Macallan 12 01:16, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
Is there anything else that you can think of to help clean it up. Cheers. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 12:05, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
Cloverfield
Pages such as JamieandTeddy.com are registered to the same email address (teddyhanssen@yahoo.com) as the one of the MySpace profiles, which are confirmed as part of the viral marketing campaign for Cloverfield. Therefore by association they are related.
Slashfilm and other site have confirmed that Slusho.jp is a part of the viral marketing campaign. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Captain Impulse (talk • contribs) 06:59, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
- That would constitute original research. Provide links to articles where people involved with the production/marketing confirm that the sites are involved, and they can be included. Unverifiable content will almost always be removed, especially from high-visibility articles. --Closedmouth 07:05, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
- Where is your confirmation on 1-18-08.com? Where are the "links to articles where people involved with the production/marketing confirm that the sites are involved"? It doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure this stuff out. How obvious does it need to be? Viral marketing is the way it is to be intentionally vague. Either adapt to the environment or you're going to miss a big piece of the puzzle.
- Fine, whatever, remove the 1-18-08.com. That's not my problem. I'm just arguing why you can't include the others. You're speaking to me as if I represent the encyclopaedia as a whole. If you have a problem with how the place works, don't come crying to me.--Closedmouth 07:20, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
- Where is your confirmation on 1-18-08.com? Where are the "links to articles where people involved with the production/marketing confirm that the sites are involved"? It doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure this stuff out. How obvious does it need to be? Viral marketing is the way it is to be intentionally vague. Either adapt to the environment or you're going to miss a big piece of the puzzle.
- I think "unverifiable content will almost always be removed" is a loose enough descriptor to warrant a common sense look at the facts as enough evidence.
- Sorry, you've lost me. --Closedmouth 07:20, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
- I think "unverifiable content will almost always be removed" is a loose enough descriptor to warrant a common sense look at the facts as enough evidence.
Almost always does not imply always. Therefore, looking at the facts that we do have (registered emails, links to other confirmed sites, etc), all it takes is a little common sense to put everything together. Do you really think someone faked a video for the movie using one of the actual actresses from the movie? Not likely.
1-18-08 is linked because the connection is pretty obvious. Well, the same can be said for the sites I listed.
It's one thing to be cautious, but its an entirely different thing to be ignorant. --Captain Impulse 07:27, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
- Thank you for finally signing your username, but can you please argue this with someone else? I find it incredibly tedious. Erik seems to have the arguments down pat. --Closedmouth 07:33, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
Done. But in the future, try and be a little more open-minded. Expecting a confirmed nod from industry reps concerning viral marketing is counter-productive to their scheme and highly unlikely. --Captain Impulse 07:45, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
short pages
I noticed that you were cleaning up short pages. Some say that's a thankless task. Here's a hearty Thanks! to prove them wrong. Carlossuarez46 16:24, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
Thanks
Thanks for picking up and putting the warning on 58.105.151.6 --Mikecraig 21:51, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
Stop lies
Someone put opinion in the article on scarcity, but it was not negative. I erased it - did I do the right thing?? Arsenal15 21:55, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
Vandalism on Portarlington, Victoria
I think the vandal may have self reverted his vandalism; at least the vandalism since my last edit. See here for a diff. Since there is nothing to revert, Wikipedia treats it as a non-edit, the same as if you hit the save page button without making a change. Cheers, Mattinbgn\talk 05:40, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
"a fat cunt and probably gay".
- dope infobox. yr friend dissonance... (tomasz.) 12:23, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
???
I noticed that you edited this article before, tell me, is it a sandbox? Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 20:58, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
Ethical Implications of Work Choices
Hi, I was wondering if you'd be willing to delete the entire Ethical Implications of Work Choices entry. Much of the material has been duplicated in the releveant wiki entries for Work Choices and AWAs (two separate entries, to boot!).
Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.175.153.88 (talk) 12:21, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
Prof.rick, Chuck Cannuck
Thanks, Closedmouth. I knew I had screwed up. I did some honest editing on the "mail.com" article, and feared they might seek retribution! All I really wanted to do was delete my user page history (by which they could trace material I've removed, such as my picture). Can the history be removed? If not, can it be archived? (There must be some way to "hide" my user-pagge history.) My talk page is OK...it's just the history of "Prof.rick" I'm worried about. Thanks. Prof.rick 08:14, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for your very speedy reply! The removal tag is in place. Prof.rick 17:58, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
Archive page
Could you explain why you feel that the archive page that you place the speedy delete on should be deleted, or what is wrong with the page? See: National_Civilian_Community_Corps/Archive_3 Dbiel (Talk) 07:28, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
- It's a page in the main namespace that has been (according to its history) blanked by its original author. In other words, WP:CSD#G7 --Closedmouth 13:18, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
- It is actually an archive talk page that use to be a sub page in article name space. I am still trying to figure out the difference between a talk page archive (that has a link to an article window) which is a sub page off of the article / article talk page duo; and an article sub page that also has links to an article section and a talk section. The page was deleted and then the talk / discussion page protion was restored Talk:National_Civilian_Community_Corps/Archive_3 , so this page is no longer a problem but I was wondering if you could explain the difference. Dbiel (Talk) 04:03, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
- The paradox; you can not delete an article page without also deleting the attached discussion page, but you can restore the discussion page without restoring the article page. Article and discussion pages are separate yet tied to each other. I am having difficulting understanding ther relationship. Dbiel (Talk) 04:07, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks for the reply. The question basicly comes down to how could I, or should I have handled the archive of this article sub page so that it does not get deleted and then have to have some restore it? Dbiel (Talk) 05:17, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks for the additional information. The remaining question is the link to an article page that is always a part of a talk page archive. Clicking on the link will create a new article sub page, but there seems to be some unwritten rule about not using the associated article page that is linked to the archived talk page. Dbiel (Talk) 21:14, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
Opinion sought
'mouth — encyclopaedic or no? cheers, tomasz. 14:00, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
- and again – would this have passed CSD/prod/AfD, in your opinion? the creator says that "my carelessness" (in nominating for CSD) is "to the detriment of Wikipedia itself", but i reckon that if that's true, the same would go for any thinking editor on this whole site. cheers Aussie voice of reason, tomasz. 16:46, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
- Looks pretty delete-worthy to me. Most of those "Why did you delete my page" objections don't warrant much of a response apart from RTFM. --Closedmouth 12:40, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
Your message on my talk page
You left a rather unfriendly toned message on my talk page asking me to stop blanking redirect page David Wolfe (Vegan) but you may not have checked my contribution history to see what was going on. As of yesterday, all wiki-links to any "David Wolfe" went to this person, who also had a very advertising oriented article. I created the first redirect for the vegan using a capital letter and then created a disambiguation page - David Wolfe. When I realized that the wiki standard for article descriptors is lower case, I created a new redirect for David Wolfe (vegan). Because the link I created earlier with the capital letter didn't have any links, I blanked it. I also spent considerable time sorting out the other David Wolfe links to specific people (with other suggested redirects), created a stub for David Wolfe (actor) and did my best to clean up the vegan's promotional article. I've been editing for less than two months and am still learning. I don't know how to get an unnecessary, duplicative redirect page deleted - perhaps it's not even an issue.
I've noticed that some of the more experienced editors can be condescending toward us newbies and I'd like to suggest a friendlier, more helpful (instructional) approach when you see that someone appears to be trying to contribute in good faith as I think my history shows. My message to this new user is an example. I would have appreciated a similar approach in your message to me. OccamzRazor 15:37, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
Your NPWatcher application
Dear Closedmouth,
Thank you for applying for NPWatcher! You've been approved to use it. Before you run the program, please check the changelog on the application page to see if there is a newer release (or just add the main page (here) to your watchlist). Report any bugs or feature suggestion here. If you need help, feel free to contact me or join NPWatcher.
WjBscribe 07:21, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
My renaming
Actually, creating that dummy redirect didn't work like I thought it would, and I resorted to cutting and pasting the whole text into the new title (the redirect page), which you're not supposed to do because it wipes out the history. I'll be sure not to do it again. Hgrosser 09:51, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
You marked this with a notability tag. It's got plenty of sources. What's your qualm? Chubbles 02:06, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
- They don't seem to be notable --Closedmouth 02:09, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
- Per WP:MUSIC they meet guidelines 1 and 4, and probably 5 (even though RocketStar doesn't have an article, it is a rather well-known indie with a decent roster). Chubbles 02:11, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
RE. Why did this happen.
I was having problems with some JS tools. Thanks for reverting my mistake. Sorry for any confusion:( Thedjatclubrock :) (T/C) 02:48, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
Sick Day (Kim Possible)
Hi, I thought you mihgt like to know that I was trying to move the article "Sick Day" to "Sick Day (Kim Possible)," and it didn't work, hence my mistaken blanking. ----DanTD 04:11, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
Amrik Bhatia
Just curious - what exactly happened with the Amrik Bhatia page? Did someone vandalize it and you submit for speedy deletion the vandalized version? That would seem to be what happened according to the page history, but you would know better than me. Eitherway, don't worry - these mistakes are easy to make when you're faced with vandal after vandal to revert - heck, I've had articles deleted on people frighteningly more notable whose articles I've created based upon a vandalized version of the page.
Eitherway, all in the fight for anti-vandalism. Bobo. 12:48, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
On User talk:Bobo192, Closedmouth said:
From what I can tell, the page was hijacked by the frighteningly vain Amrikrocks. Check out his/her talk page, it's a nightmare. Thanks for being understanding, I'm always worried about these things happening when I'm using automated tools like twinkle.
The best thing in the world about Twinkle is that it is so good that what it is capable of doing scares you when you accidentally do what you don't want to. As it is, the only thing that changed in the diff here was the title of the article, and no actual page content as would be assumed if you read the edit summary and were just passing through - while he claimed to add more information, all he did was move the page.
Thankfully the editor seems to have stopped, but one further contribution he has made is to the rather confusing Template:Infobox The Serial Hacker. Maybe this is supposed to mean something I can't put my finger on - but it's hard to tell.
All the best. Bobo. 14:04, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
Vandalism
hello closemoth what happened i vandalised sorry my friend told me to do it. Otherwise she will say bad things to me :(
- I don't care about your friend, just stop --Closedmouth (talk) 14:04, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
Cloverfield
Hey, can I ask you to practice a little more civility like here? Saying "Removing general discussion per WP:TALK" would be better than "Nobody cares". We have a hard time dealing with editors' original contributions about the so-called viral websites. —Erik (talk • contrib) - 18:40, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
- No worries. I know maintaining Cloverfield has been a test of our patience, considering all the forum talk about the film's nature. —Erik (talk • contrib) - 05:15, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
Edit summary
For which edit? I'm doing about 2-3 edits per minute, atm. ++Arx Fortis (talk) 02:53, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
- Ah..sorry. Well, I do all my edits manually and didn't think it would be necessary to create an edit summary for an article that is very obviously going to be speedily deleted in a minute or two. However, I will try to make an effort to do so in the future. Thanks. ++Arx Fortis (talk) 03:00, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
Cloverfield
Dear,
Idiot.
You deleted my entries on the Cloverfield page because I "did not cite my sources". Listen. I cited them in the text itself! Let's go back to what I added to the Plot Speculation section of said film.
"Another very popular speculation of the film is that it is a film based on the "Rampage" video games. There are several clues that support this. "Slusho" is a very important part of the marketing campaign for the film. In the Rampage games when a human drinks "Slusho" they turn into a giant monster. On the film's viral marketing site, www. slusho.jp, the "creator" of Slusho writes about making the drink and now, whenever they drink it, they become "a giant whale".
See that? slusho.jp - sounds like a reliable source to me being that IT'S THE MARKETING CITE FOR THE MOVIE!!
Also, I have played the Rampage games and, as everyone else who has played them, I know that Slusho is something that the characters can drink in order to become the monsters!!
PLUS - The section was on Plot SPECULATION - not PLOT, so reliable sources should not be needed in the first place since SPECULATION is a matter of OPINION based on clues, which I stated.
Please, for the sake of the integrity of this site -
Stop being stupid. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.115.167.235 (talk) 09:30, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
- Thank you for the personal attacks, but please read WP:OR --Closedmouth (talk) 10:39, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
Looks like you missed the "Citing Oneself" section. Here's a good part from it: "This policy does not prohibit editors with specialist knowledge from adding their knowledge to Wikipedia, but it does prohibit them from drawing on their personal knowledge without citing their sources." Slusho.jp was cited as the source and a reliable one at that since it is the film's marketing site. Here's another good section: "the editor may cite that source while writing in the third person." My addition to the Plot Speculation section is covered by the "Secondary Source" policy in that my secondary source is Slusho.jp and that that site follows policy in that it "relates or discusses information originally presented elsewhere, and often makes generalizations or interpretive, analytical, or synthetic claims." —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.115.167.235 (talk) 09:21, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
Shitbox
Hey - what was wrong with the edit on Shitbox? It's a genuine usage of the word - used a lot more than the Auto definition! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 134.32.102.44 (talk) 13:13, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
- Well, basically, Wikipedia is not a dictionary, and especially not an Urban Dictionary. Speaking of which, they tend to disagree with you. Not that the opinions of anyone on that site are worth the paper they're printed on. --Closedmouth (talk) 13:24, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
Fair enough our kid. Fair enough. I was taking the term from Roger's Profanisaurus (www.viz.co.uk) - but you make a fair point about the dictionary, and I stand corrected!