User talk:Closed Limelike Curves

	; Archives (Index) ;
	2024/June; 2024/July; 2024/October; 2024/November; 2024/December;
	This page is archived by ClueBot III.

"MOS:WINGSUIT" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect MOS:WINGSUIT has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 January 3 § MOS:WINGSUIT until a consensus is reached. —Bagumba (talk) 05:44, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A cup of tea for you!

thank you for your contributions!! :) x RozuRozu • ^tea _cups 22:14, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much! Tea is good ^_^ – Closed Limelike Curves (talk) 01:02, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes reviewer granted

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes#Requirements to accept an edit, when to accept an edit

Elli (talk | contribs) 18:57, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Contentious topics alert for all pages related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people

You have recently made edits related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people. This is a standard message to inform you that post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Wikipedia:Contentious topics. Doug Weller talk 08:56, 19 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

MOS:DASH

Hi. Please stop violating MOS:DASH as you did in Blinder–Oaxaca decomposition and Attacks on US bases in Iraq, Jordan, and Syria during the Israel–Hamas war. Please do not make any further MOS-violating moves. --Omnipaedista (talk) 20:07, 24 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, looks like I misremembered MOS:DASH. (I thought combining a pair of words like that required a hyphen instead of an en dash.) – Closed Limelike Curves (talk) 20:11, 24 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

That's OK! --Omnipaedista (talk) 01:18, 25 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

'Consensus'

Re this claim that "there's a consensus to move the data found in {{election results}} tables on Wikipedia", I'm really struggling to see how you reached that conclusion. There was a very brief discussion, but there was no support for the idea as far as I can see, just people pointing out the issues/difficulties in doing so.

Any significant changes to Wikipedia should be discussed on Wikipedia, not in the closed Discord group. Ideas can be discussed on Discord, but it is not a place for decision-making. Number 5 7 18:19, 25 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

That would be why I deleted the request, which I'd typed out but accidentally sent too early (before the end of the conversation, where people suggested starting with templates first). – Closed Limelike Curves (talk) 18:28, 25 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]