User talk:Cleverchild

Welcome!

Hello, Cleverchild, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome!

Speedy deletion nomination of Project'Or RIA

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

A tag has been placed on Project'Or RIA, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be unambiguous advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item G11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, . Clicking that button will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the article's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. You may freely add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Dmol (talk) 21:29, 30 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

September 2011

A tag has been placed on Project'Or RIA requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, because it appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion process. If you can indicate how it is different from the previously posted material, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's discussion directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please contact the administrator who deleted the page or use deletion review instead recreating the page. Thank you. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 22:52, 30 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Reply to your post at Talk:Project'Or RIA

Greetings! The page at Project'Or RIA was deleted following a deletion discussion because the subject was not notable. Hangon rationales such as the one you posted are generally deleted along with the article; in this case the hangon argument was not valid because the reason for the deletion was that the article has already been through a deletion discussion. Thanks, and feel free to contact me on my talk page if you have any questions. VQuakr (talk) 20:50, 1 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Project'Or RIA

A tag has been placed on Project'Or RIA, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia for multiple reasons. Please see the page to see the reasons. If the page has since been deleted, you can ask me the reasons by leaving a message on my user talk page.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Nolelover ^Talk^·^Contribs 15:03, 26 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

RE:Deletion of my latest contribution "Project'or RIA"

Your article was deleted for not asserting the importance or significance of the subject and also was written with a slight advertising tone (using pronouns like "your" is used a lot in advertising not wiki articles): both were legitimate reasons to speedy delete your article. That other article has been here for years and I, personally, have never seen it before. I review articles on a case to case basis when they are tagged for deletion and I haven't read all 3 million article on wikipedia to see if they are all suitable as it's simply impossible. But, for your information, that other article is currently tagged for deletion (tagged for an AFD discussion deletion as it's been here for many years and there are multiple contributors in the page history).

The problem with your article is that it is on its fourth deletion in the last six months (different users re-created it) and was taken to articles for deletion and deleted via that process as the contributors of that discussion couldn't find any coverage in reliable sources to verify notability/significance. So I would suggest re-writing the article in your userspace and then submitting it to articles for creation as they will tell you if the article has fulfilled the necessary critera and if it is suitable for re-creation in the mainspace.

Although, for future reference, contesting the deletion of your article saying "but that article is the same therefore it must be deleted too" isn't very helpful (Wikipedia's arguments to avoid in deletion discussions RE:Individual merit of articles explains why very well). What is helpful is dealing with your article and its problems and how they can be fixed so they can avoid deletion in the future. After all a lot of us, myself included, are here to help and don't delete articles on a whim because we don't like it or something. We delete/not delete on a case-to-case basis per what is said in Wikipedia's guidelines. Many thanks. AngelOfSadness talk 18:32, 27 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]