User talk:Cincao03

Retired

This user is no longer active on Wikipedia.

Thanks DoRD (talk) you never helped, no my wiki career is over, since no one liked me.Cincao 03 21:32, 14 June 2014 (UTC) Cincao03 14:49, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Cincao03, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page – I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.

Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Table of contents

Department directory

Need help?

Questions – a guide on where to ask questions
Cheatsheet – quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes
Wikipedia's 5 pillars – an overview of Wikipedia's foundations
The Wikipedia Adventure (a tutorial orienting you with Wikipedia)

Article wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
The simplified ruleset – a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules
Guide to Wikipedia – a thorough step-by-step guide to Wikipedia

How you can help:

Contributing to Wikipedia – a guide on how you can help

Community portal – Wikipedia's hub of activity

Additional tips...

Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The or button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.

If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills the Sandbox is for you.

Cincao03, good luck, and have fun. – —DoRD (talk) 14:47, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Cincao03, I have unfortunately had to suppress some of your edits because they reveal too much personally identifiable information about you. We have a policy of protecting editors' safety by hiding such information if they share it. I'm really sorry about having to suppress your edits, and I know it's annoying, but it's for the best. Please don't re-add the information. For some useful information on privacy and safety, you can take a look at Wikipedia:Guidance for younger editors and Wikipedia:On privacy, confidentiality and discretion. Thanks, and sorry for messing about with your pages! —DoRD (talk) 14:33, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

DoRD (talk) i can see if something like this were to happen agian could i get blocked. And why is this bad.

Hi, Cincao03. We care about the safety of Wikipedia editors, and sometimes younger editors reveal too much information about themselves. We remove that sort of information because, on Wikipedia, almost everything is visible to everyone, and that information could be used to harm you. Obviously, nobody wants to block you, and unless you violate the rules, we won't. If you have any other questions, you may ask them here since I have your page on my watchlist. —DoRD (talk) 14:47, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Cincao03. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Mz7 (talk) 02:19, 6 June 2014 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template.[reply]

Cincao03 02:24, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

userbox

Hey Zappa O Mati could you go to my userpage and try to fix that userbox, and put the image in there. Or do you know any one else that could do it. Cincao03 (talk) 21:28, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I fixed it. Photo's a little big, so feel free to edit the size. Zappa 24 Mati 21:41, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Zappa 24 Mati Is there any way you could make this into a real infobox. With a code.

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Cincao03. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by LukeSurl^{t c} 23:45, 6 June 2014 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template.[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 00:00, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[[User:Cincao03|'''Cincao]][[Special:contributions/Cincao03|'''0''']][[User talk:Cincao03|'''3''']] (talk) 00:08, 7 June 2014 (UTC)

Cincao03 18:16, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: User:Cincao03/sandbox (June 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Cincao03/sandbox.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Thank you for your
contributions to Wikipedia!

Please remember to link to the submission!

You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

hewhoam areismyself 02:45, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Draft:Kelly Oubre (June 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Kelly Oubre.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Thank you for your
contributions to Wikipedia!

Please remember to link to the submission!

You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

hewhoam areismyself 02:48, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The overwhelming majority of high school athletes are not considered notable enough for a Wikipedia biography. Only a very small percentage of top-tier college athletes are considered notable. Athletes playing at the fully professional level in top-tier leagues are notable. What in particular makes this high school athlete notable, in your opinion, based on our policies and guidelines? Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 03:16, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah He is number 2 in positiona and number 7 overall and comitited to Kansas, and will be one&done. [1]

I know but there are college recurites like this one like Cliff Alexander and Jahlil Okafor and they are not in the pros these three people are at the same level, what else could i do Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it. Cincao03 03:21, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Alexander was ranked in the top 5 nationally for high school badketball players, and Okafor was ranked #1 twice, I believe. Does your guy have similar rankings? Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 03:34, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah He is number 2 in positiona and number 7 overall and comitited to Kansas, and will be one&done. [1] Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss itCincao03 13:17, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

And 6th overall on Yahoo rankings. [2] Cullen³²⁸ Cincao03 13:25, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Texas vs texas tech.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Texas vs texas tech.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Nthep (talk) 20:03, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nthep (talk) Could you use it the right way please. The image is apporopate.Cincao 03 20:06, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The image might be appropriate but there is already a freely licenced image in use on that page on the end of the game pitch invasion, so the use of an image of the same event under the non-free use criteria isn't permissible. Nthep (talk) 20:14, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I know Nthep (talk) but the this image shows the field view the otherone shows a few people.Cincao 03 20:28, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

So there is a possibility that there are other free images of the event then, so you upload still fails NFCC#1. besides let's consider the other nine criteria, all of which also have to be met. NFCC#8 says "Contextual significance. Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the article topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding." As you've described it "A image of the celebration of the game. A example of a pitch invasion" that sounds like something that could easily be explained without an image. There doesn't appear to be anything especially unusual about this pitch invasion against others that requires a number of images to add to the contextual understanding. Nthep (talk) 21:01, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your signature

Hello again Cincao03! I'm afraid I have some bad new about your signature. First, it violates WP:SIGIMAGE which says Images of any kind must not be used in signatures for the following reasons:... So, I'll have to ask you to remove the baseball image. Second, it violates WP:SIGAPP which says Avoid deprecated markup such as the  tag.... Third, also part of WP:SIGAPP, is As some users have vision problems, be sparing with color. If you insist on using different colors in your signature, please ensure that the result will be readable by people with color blindness, defective color vision, and other visual disabilities.The Web Content Accessibility Guidelines recommend a contrast ratio of at least 5:1 for text – use this Contrast ratio calculator to help determine if the colors you choose will be visible to everyone. Wikipedia's talk page background color (on the default vector skin) is a very light blue (#F8FCFF). Other tools for checking contrast are described at Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Accessibility#Color. Your username is 5.9:1 Y, your "0" which links to your contributions is 8.6:1 Y, your "3" which links to your talk page is 3.6:1 N. What I recommend is changing your signature to:

[[User:Cincao03|'''<span style="color:#C00">Cincao</span>''']]<sup>[[Special:contribs/Cincao03|<span style="color:#00D">'''0'''</span>]][[User talk:Cincao03|<span style="color:#F0C;background:#000">'''3'''</span>]]</sup>

Which get's rid of the image, gets rid of the deprecated code, and changes the color for that last character to 6.3:1 Y and will look like Cincao 0 3 . Thanks! — {{U|Technical 13}} ^{(e • t • c)} 21:42, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Texas vs texas tech.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Texas vs texas tech.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:49, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Ks state fans storm court.jpds.jpg.gif

Thanks for uploading File:Ks state fans storm court.jpds.jpg.gif. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Nthep (talk) 10:44, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Non free uploads

You really have to understand the basics about non-free uploads. If there is already available an out of copyright or freely licenced image then it doesn't really matter how good the non free image is, it can't be used. It's tough and at times it's a complete and utter pain in the ass but that's the way the policy works. As there already numerous free images of pitch invasions, a non free one is a non-starter. The same rule also applies if a free image can be created but there isn't one currently, so your non free image of Wilking Rodríguez falls foul of the same rule. As a free image of him can be found or created then using a non free one, even in the interim, is not permissible. Nthep (talk) 10:51, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

June 2014

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at 2014 McDonald's All-American Boys Game. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 07:04, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

TonyTheTiger (T Who the hell was that vandilism. Cincao03 13:42, 10 June 2014 (UTC) Cincao03 13:42, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I forgot about the "Draft" userspace. I was thinking it had something to do with getting drafted a year from now. Regardless, unless you put the article in mainspace, it should not be linked to. The article should be approved for main space. Find better sources and dig deeper. Things like ESPN and such should help out. Look at Tyus Jones, Kameron Chatman and Tyler Ulis.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 15:14, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Wilking rodríguez.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Wilking rodríguez.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 18:00, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Wilking rodríguez.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Wilking rodríguez.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 18:00, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Ks state fans storm court.jpds.jpg.gif

Thank you for uploading File:Ks state fans storm court.jpds.jpg.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 18:02, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Texas vs texas tech.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Texas vs texas tech.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 18:02, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thx Stefan2 (talk) the problem is the copyright owner. So they say the copyright owner isint real or invailid is the problem. Cincao03 20:40, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Re: "block"

Hello, Cincao03. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Marchjuly (talk) 00:57, 13 June 2014 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template.[reply]

June 2014

Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. I am glad to see that you are discussing a topic. However, as a general rule, talk pages such as Talk:Miami Heat are for discussion related to improving the article, not general discussion about the topic or unrelated topics. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. Thank you.--Arxiloxos (talk) 15:08, 13 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

June 2014

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for using multiple accounts per Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/TyTyKKWIki. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. —Bagumba (talk) 19:02, 13 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Cincao03 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am just a wikipedian that got blocked Cincao03 20:06, 13 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

That is an accurate assessment of the situation. Unfortunately, you've provided no valid unblock reason. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 20:35, 13 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You don't get to remove declined unblocked requests. The reasons for your block are clearly outlined on this page. Further spurious "playing dumb" requests will likely result in talk page access revocation. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 21:00, 13 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Cincao03 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I didntdo anything they say im abusing multiple accounts what the hell, i have done nothing bad on wikipedia, You tookaway something i love Bagumba (talk), and didnt do anything wrong this time. If this dosent go my way im retiring. Cincao03 13:37, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This account has been used to evade blocks on other accounts, and yo have given no reason at all why it should be unblocked. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 23:08, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Here's the thing: Once your first account was blocked, you were not supposed to create another one to carry on as if nothing had happened. You are not allowed to edit with any account unless you can show us that you will stop causing problems for Wikipedia. Until then, maybe you should find another hobby. —DoRD (talk) 14:10, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

DoRD (talk) I have not caused asny trouble for wikipedia, no vandilism i dont get this stupid scokpuppet shit.Cincao 03 14:15, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

All you have to do is read the messages on this page to see that you have, in fact, caused problems. The very first edit on this page, by me, was to tell you about a problem that I had to fix, so please don't try to tell me that you don't know what we're talking about. As for the sockpuppetry: Please read this. You are not allowed to make new accounts after another of your accounts has been blocked. I am one of a handful of users who is able to see that you have used several accounts as shown here. I don't doubt that you enjoy editing Wikipedia, and we are not trying to take anything away from you, but I just don't think that you're ready to edit here yet. —DoRD (talk) 14:28, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks DoRD (talk) because im retired. 14:48, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

DoRD (talk) I have been blocked for sock puppet with 6 accounts when will the block expire, i have seen the expire time it say no expire time yet. When will can i start editing agian, or can i never edit on this ip adress agian. Cincao03 22:06, 15 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You cannot edit under any username or IP until you are able to convince an administrator that you understand why you were blocked and explain how you will change your editing behaviour to avoid the mistakes that led to your previous blocks. Your best hope in regaining the community's trust is to follow the directions at WP:Standard offer.--Jezebel'sPonyo ^{bons mots} 20:37, 16 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Jezebel'sPonyo ^{bons mots} Will there be a time im not blocked any more and can choose an account. Or can i never edit on this ip adress agian.Cincao 03 02:29, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

There is no time limit on your block - you cannot edit until an administrator unblocks your account, which will likely only happen by following the instructions I already linked to here. Unless you are unblocked you cannot edit from this account, create new accounts, or edit via any IP.--Jezebel'sPonyo ^{bons mots} 15:27, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Jezebel'sPonyo ^{bons mots} on the person that blocked me who is Bagumba dosent have an email and i dont know what an irc is, i just want to be unblocked.Cincao 03 21:35, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Begumba does have email enabled, it's included on the right hand side of his userpage as "Email this user". You'll not need anyone's email address for at least six months however as point 1 of the Standard Offer is clear, "Wait six months, without sockpuppetry". Once six months has passed, if you have refrained from creating additional sock accounts, then you can worry about who to email. --

Jezebel'sPonyo ^{bons mots} so dont email him untill six months, if i still am not blocked, or could i email him right now.Cincao 03 00:09, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Jezebel'sPonyo ^{bons mots} please answer.Cincao 03 12:46, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't be so impatient, volunteers have lives outside of Wikipedia and are not necessarily available whenever another editor decides they want to "ping" them. I don't know how I can be any clearer, the instructions at WP:Standard offer are very simple: Go away for six months. Come back. Make a reasonable unblock request either on your talk page or by emailing an admin. That's it.--Jezebel'sPonyo ^{bons mots} 15:47, 19 June 2014 (UTC) Bagumba please unblock I have wated months, that's all I thought about when I went to sleep please, some one help, wiki is my life , I know I make mistakes, im sorry im soory im sorry!!![reply]

76.92.162.7 (talk) 23:42, 6 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Kelly Oubre concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Kelly Oubre, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:03, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Kelly Oubre

Hello Cincao03. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Kelly Oubre".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by one of two methods (don't do both): 1) follow the instructions at WP:REFUND/G13, or 2) copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Draft:Kelly Oubre}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, and click "Save page". An administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 02:37, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]