Jump to content

User talk:Chudinho

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome

[edit]

Hello, Chudinho, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

If you are interested in Ukraine-related themes, you may want to check out the Ukraine Portal, particularly the Portal:Ukraine/New article announcements and Portal:Ukraine/Ukraine-related Wikipedia notice board. The New article announcements board is probably the most important and the most attended one. Please don't forget to announce there the new articles you create. Adding both boards to your watchlist is probably a good idea.

Finally, in case you are interested, similar boards exist at Russia portal as many editors contribute to topics related to both countries. The respective boards there are: Portal:Russia/New article announcements and Portal:Russia/Russia-related Wikipedia notice board. Of course there are also many other portals at Wikipedia or you may just get right into editing.

Again, welcome!—dima/s-ko/ 03:20, 16 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Gelios kharkiv.gif. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
  • That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 01:18, 13 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Edits

[edit]

Spasiba za pozdravlenya. Ya teba takzhe Pozdravlyayu z Novum Godom i Rozhdistvom Christovim!! About the transfers, coach Markevych said, when asked about squad changes, that Zeze is expected to leave and yesterday on ua-football they said that Fomin is returning to Shakhtar and his future with Metalist is uncertain. I understand the move hasn't been made yet since the players are all on break until January 7th and I will be more careful and not move potential transfers. On a side note, when should I move Kravchenko to Dynamo or Castillo to Shakhtar? Both of them are expected to move, but will be at there respected clubs on Jan 7th. --Shustfan (talk) 18:21, 30 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Z praznikom :)))

FC Metalist Kharkiv

[edit]

I agree with your assessment, all of the famous players sections on club pages should be tagged unless some defined criteria from an external source is established as to what confers notability. So, I have reinstated the tag. A look at a couple of featured articles can show how to address this problem. For Everton F.C. there are several quantifiable measurements for whether a player is notable, inclusion in the club's own Hall of Fame (Everton Giants) or a "greatest ever" team, as established by a poll, etc. The Arsenal F.C. page deals with the issue by not having a notable players section, instead directing to a list of every Arsenal player with 100 or more appearances (List of Arsenal F.C. players) and record appearance and goalscorer statistics (Arsenal F.C. records#Player records). Perhaps one of these methods is the best way to deal with Metalist's notable players section, otherwise it should be dismissed as original research. Dancarney (talk) 10:34, 23 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

[edit]

Hello Chudinho! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. Please note that all biographies of living persons must be sourced. If you were to add reliable, secondary sources to this article, it would greatly help us with the current 1 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

  1. Anderson Ribeiro - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 21:15, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:20, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

[edit]

Hello, Chudinho. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]