User talk:Cherrylimerickey

Alma Cogan

Thank you for expanding this article. However, the main paragraph you have added does not continues any references/citations. It may possibly be a copyvio 'cut and paste' edit from an unnamed source. For example; "And altho there's no clear indication as to the success of these German tracks" - my own 'cut and paste' from the present Cogan article wording - suggests a lack of citable source, or possibly original research.

I know you are probably quite new to Wikipedia, and I certainly do not want to alarm you, or put you off editing. However, the Wikipedia:Five Pillars are worth reading - if you do not fall asleep first ?!! With very best wishes and intent,

Derek R Bullamore (talk) 00:30, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

re: Your Message

Hi Cherrylimerickey, I've left a response to your message on my talk page -- Marek.69 ^talk 22:17, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

May 2009

Please do not replace Wikipedia pages with blank content, as you did to Talk:(Your Love Keeps Lifting Me) Higher and Higher. Blank pages are harmful to Wikipedia because they have a tendency to confuse readers. If it is a duplicate article, please redirect it to an appropriate existing page. If the page has been vandalized, please revert it to the last legitimate version. If you feel that the content of a page is inappropriate, please edit the page and replace it with appropriate content. If you believe there is no hope for the page, please see the deletion policy for how to proceed. — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 22:17, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s):

Apparently the block on your IP has expired; you should be able to edit now.

Request handled by: Blueboy 96 22:43, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Unblocking administrator: Please check for active autoblocks on this user after accepting the unblock request.

Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s):

Autoblock #1724253 lifted or expired. For the time being, you may want to avoid editing from the library. If the problem persists, we can give you a block exemption to avoid these, but since this is a public terminal I don't think that's necessary.

Request handled by: Hersfold ^(t/a/c)

Unblocking administrator: Please check for active autoblocks on this user after accepting the unblock request.

One must wonder: why have you been autoblocked twice, on two different IPs, because of blocks upon User:Haida chieftain? Is it just coincidence that you've edited on different IPS, within minutes of each other as this editor? --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 22:15, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

All the editing I've done recently on Wikipedia - and virtually all the editing I've ever done - has been on public access terminals provided by the branches of my local library. Unfortunately one of the many other library patrons who avail themselves of this library service is evidently using poor judgement in his or her editing of Wikipedia causing these IP address autoblock issues that have effected me. That the IP address of the computer system in my local libraries is subject to change is an evident attribute of my local libraries' computer system that I really cannot comment on.--Cherrylimerickey (talk) 01:36, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

As a librarian in a library that has had it's wikipedia editing privileges blocked for a while I can second the thought these these sorts of block do not, or rather, should not, reflect on the editing of any particular editor. However, if you would put something, anything on your user page than your name would appear in blue rather than in red and it might positively effect the way other editors viewed your edits. Einar aka Carptrash (talk) 22:04, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Before and After (song) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Before and After (song) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Before and After (song) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. HominidMachinae (talk) 22:16, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Take Me to Your Heart Again

Thank you for completing the song credits and adding other album details. If you can incorporate an authority for the statement concerning videos being prepared for two of the songs, which were also intended for single release in the UK, that would improve the article.

Dreadarthur (talk) 06:36, 27 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Even a Fool Would Let Go

Probably only a fool would put this much energy into getting the facts right on an obscure country song, but... Actually, it appears the song appeared on the 1977 Charlie Rich album Take Me (see PragueFrank's listing here, for instance). Looking at 45s for sale online, I'm not certain there wasn't a US single in 1977 as well. So, why was it a hit in 1980? Did it appear in a movie or something? Or did it just catch on for some reason? I need to do some more research (or you can). Brianyoumans (talk) 01:28, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see any reason other than perhaps that the promotion of the three versions put out in 1979 and 1980 may have produced interest in the Rich version. I think I will go ahead and change the article unless I find more info.Brianyoumans (talk) 02:09, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You're right about the track being on the Take Me album. However I would maintain that the 1977 single release was only in the UK based on the absence of a 1977 US release appearing in this detailed discography: [1]. That the image of the single of Rich's US single of "Even a Fool Would Let Go" (Epic 9-50869) - shown here [2] - displays a copyright date of 1977 I'd explain as referencing the track's original release on the Take Me album and not the US single release. This image [3] which clearly states a release date of March 1977 is for the UK single, Rich then being in the US C&W Top 30 with the Epic single "Easy Look".

Its curious that Epic would be moved to release any track by Rich in 1980 two years after he'd left the label: his current recordings weren't displaying any particularly strong popularity for his previous label to want to "cash in on" ("A Man Just Don't Know What a Woman Goes Through" did almost make the C&W Top Ten that year but not til the autumn: Epic released the "Even a Fool Would Let Go" single in April 1980). And I can't surmise any especial motivation for Epic to chose that particular song, its appearing on recent albums by other C&W artists I wouldn't see as conveying any real cachet (also Epic evidently wasn't impressed enough by Pop/C&W superstar Kenny Rogers recording "Even a Fool Would Let Go" in 1978 to release Rich's version that year): however I wouldn't go so far as to delete that rationale from the article. If I come across any other nuggets about the song I'll certainly edit them in.--Cherrylimerickey (talk) 19:05, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It looks like it was some sort of plan on Epic's part - they released a single in 1979 and another one in April 1981. And the 1981 one charted, a bit higher. Perhaps they were just trying a make a little money on stuff they already had waxed, while someone else promoted the artist.Brianyoumans (talk) 20:16, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Blue Winter.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! ChrisGualtieri (talk) 16:44, 12 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

May 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to A Summer Song may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:38, 9 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Downtown (Petula Clark song) may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:58, 18 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

June 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Everybody Loves a Lover may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

and harmonies. Issued as Columbia [Catalog numbering systems for single records|catalog number]] 41195, "Everybody Loves a Lover" first reached the [[Billboard charts|Billboard magazine charts]]

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 00:12, 13 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

WP:BURDEN

Per WP:BURDEN: "Any material lacking a reliable source directly supporting it may be removed.". That's what the IP did, and he was well within his rights to do so.—Kww(talk) 03:21, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Using tags is optional: an editor may choose to use them, or not. I'm not claiming the IP is a saint, just that his behaviour is supported by policy. Once the material is removed as unsourced, it requires an inline citation upon restoration.—Kww(talk) 04:23, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Apparent mistake

Don't know what you were trying to do, but I'm pretty sure this wasn't it.—Kww(talk) 22:00, 25 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

July 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Be Anything (but Be Mine) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

version of the song was that by [[Eddy Howard]] was released as [[Mercury Records|Mercury]] #5815) which reached #13 in the spring of 1952 besting the #21 chart peak of Lee's version, and also the #

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 22:45, 4 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Forget Domani may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

as B-side - reaching #48 on the [[Billboard Hot 100|Hot 100]] in ''[Billboard (magazine)|Billboard]]'' magazine). When Francis' "Forget Domani" was afforded its US single release in June 1965 it was

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 00:31, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Blue Winter concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Blue Winter, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 17:40, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

November 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to (You Don't Know) How Glad I Am may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

song as "How Glad I Am: in 1975 with an uptempo bluesy arrangement, and this version - produced by [[Gus Dudgeon] and credited to the Kiki Dee Band - was issued that spring as the follow-up to "[[I'
Bramlett]], [[Ellen Foley]], [[Maria McKee]], and - as "How Glad I Am" - by [[Fontella Bass]], [[Joyce Cobb], [[Aretha Franklin]], [[The Greyboy Allstars]], [[Brenda Lee]], [[Olivia Newton-John]]

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 21:42, 6 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Evelyn Ward may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

1967 Ward appeared in the play ''And So to Bed''*at the [[Los Angeles Theater|LA Theater Center]]), her son David Cassidy also being featured in the cast.<ref name="fpt"/>also performed in

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 22:26, 29 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

December 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Alfie (song) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

of "Alfie" include several versions by Bacharach himself, [[Patricia Barber]], [[Tony Bennett]], [[Liane Carroll], [[Randy Crawford]], [[Blossom Dearie]], [[Bill Evans]], [[Percy Faith]], [[

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 02:40, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Romeo (Petula Clark song) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

a hit (#2) in Belgium's Flemish Region. "Romeo" also achieved hit status in [[Australia]] (#2) ([[Denmark]] (#3), the [[Netherlands]] (#10), [[Norway]] (#7)<ref name="Record Charts - European">{{

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 23:46, 10 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

How Do I Make You

Please don't take my 'copyedit' flagging as being critical... it's good content, really, it is. I just noticed that your writing is pretty heavy on the use of very complex sentences that, while gramatically correct, are a bit hard to parse. Revent^talk 01:40, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Rose's Turn

Hi Cherrylimerickey, it looks like you added a lot of good info to "Everything's Coming Up Roses," and some of those sources might also mention "Rose's Turn." If you could, that page is pretty minimal and I'm sure you could help a lot. Thanks! --Gccwang (talk) 18:15, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reference Errors on 19 December

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Sweet Dreams (band) page, your edit caused an unsupported parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:19, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Livingston Taylor

Can you please explain why you added "Cheryl" here? --NeilN ^{talk to me} 21:45, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

What the hell?

Why did you remove references from the "Shoop" song article on the Linda Lewis section? You DO NOT remove sources from articles. You better put my sources back in. Caden ^cool 22:24, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Next time I see you removing sources again from articles, I will report you. Caden ^cool 22:34, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I put in more readily accessible sources for the relevant information. Report me now if you want - I'll stand by my work. And I'm not taking ultimatums from you.--Cherrylimerickey (talk) 22:52, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

What you did by removing reliable sources is pretty much called vandalism. And the sources you added were not that great. Caden ^cool

What the hell indeed. I assumed the objection was over my replacing a physical book source for the single's chart rankings with a URL. Seriously - you reverted my entire edit to reinstate the chart peak for the parent album of "It's in His Kiss"? That information is only relevant to the album, which has its own article. But it's just a few words so I will not be contentious. Again if you want to report me for vandalism - do so. I'm not sure what justification any editor could use to toss out all my hard work rather than simply replacing the info on the album into the article. --Cherrylimerickey (talk) 23:10, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I reverted your edit because you REMOVED reliable sources that I added for both the single chart ranking and the album chart ranking, so get your facts straight. Your removal of reliable sources is called vandalism. Do not remove referenced text again. Caden ^cool 01:34, 9 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I won't argue over an insistence that the album chart ranking be included in an article on the single - it is irrelevant but I admit it hardly bloats the article. And I admit I should have summarized my rationale in deleting the album chart ranking. But your response is disproportionately emotional. As far as the chart peak of the single - I didn't delete the info: I augmented it by adding more detailed info on the chart position week by week. I don't have access to the British Hit Singles and Albums book but looking at the sample pages available online it only provides peak positions & "weeks on" not the weekly breakdown which I edited into the article. To get the weekly breakdown of the single's chart rankings I had to consult the UK Official Charts website - don't see how any editor could dismiss that source as "not that great" - ; anyway, as http://www.officialcharts.com/artist/14850/linda-lewis/ verified the single's overall peak as well as the weekly breakdown, retaining a separate source for the single's peak position alone seemed superfluous. I think any objective editor would concur.

BTW - virtually all of the Wikipedia info on the Linda Lewis version of It's in His Kiss is my work. Prior to my adding input to this article as of 23 June 2009, the sum total of Wikipedia info on Linda Lewis' It's in His Kiss was this single sentence: Linda Lewis had a hit in the United Kingdom with her version in 1975. And it wasn't sourced. I really don't consider myself a vandal.

I can understand editors being concerned. I cannot understand anger.--Cherrylimerickey (talk) 17:54, 9 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Okay let me clear something up, I wasn't angry at you. I was annoyed because you removed the sources without explanation. Perhaps I should of approached you differently. Anyway you expanded her section and it looks fine and you restored my sources which is also a good thing. Caden ^cool 21:08, 9 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your reply. I'd no wish to endlessly debate with you - I was hoping to hit a conciliatory note with you & I'm pleased that seems to now be the case.--Cherrylimerickey (talk) 21:19, 9 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I agree and I too am pleased we worked it out. I would like to apologize for calling you a vandal. I was wrong to have said that. Your edits are good and so are the sources you added. You included so much good information to the Linda Lewis section and in the process made it so much better compared to what it originally was. I also noticed that you have created several music related type articles all well written with good refs. Keep up the good work. Caden ^cool 12:32, 14 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

August 2015

Please do not add or change content, as you did at University of Gibraltar, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Joseph2302 (talk) 21:48, 29 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 10 November

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Midnight Blue (Melissa Manchester song) page, your edit caused an unsupported parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:27, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 14 November

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that some edits performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. They are as follows:

On the Don't Cry Out Loud (song) page, your edit caused an unsupported parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)
On the Don't Cry Out Loud (Melissa Manchester album) page, your edit caused an unsupported parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check these pages and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:21, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	For your excellent work on so many music related articles. Keep up the good work! Caden ^cool 04:50, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Formatting

It seems that you are using a non-standard formatting for song article, for example in the chart, certification and succession tables for Downtown (Petula Clark song) and Fire (Bruce Springsteen song). I have changed those back to a more standard version, the reason being that the tables get crushed depending on the screen resolution, and it looks very bad on some screens. Hzh (talk) 14:10, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your attention. --Cherrylimerickey (talk) 00:24, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 21 December

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Shake It (Iain Matthews song) page, your edit caused an unnamed parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:27, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 30 January

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Love Really Hurts Without You page, your edit caused an unsupported parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:24, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Wizard of Oz

Hello! You added a cite to Atchison Daily Globe, July 12, 1984, p. 1. Can you please tell us the title of the article on page 1? Was there a byline? Thanks for any help. -- Ssilvers (talk) 22:35, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I've expanded the cite altho the formatting may need honing. There's no authorship attributed just the identification of the news agency as Associated Press (AP).--Cherrylimerickey (talk) 23:28, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I tweaked the formatting. -- Ssilvers (talk) 02:49, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Cherrylimerickey. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

US states

Please don't use formulations like [[Muscle Shoals, Alabama|Muscle Shoals AL]]. The use of abbreviations like AL may be usual in the US, but we are a global encyclopedia and it is not understood elsewhere in the world. The article title, Muscle Shoals, Alabama, is just fine. Ghmyrtle (talk) 21:46, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your attention.--Cherrylimerickey (talk) 21:50, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Nypl.digitalcollections.3c7fefe0-4895-0131-904f-58d385a7b928.001.r.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Nypl.digitalcollections.3c7fefe0-4895-0131-904f-58d385a7b928.001.r.jpg. However, it is currently missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Whpq (talk) 00:29, 27 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 28

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Rhetta Hughes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Exploitation (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 28 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 8

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited They Don't Know (Kirsty MacColl song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Robert Pittman (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:28, 8 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 15

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Edana Romney, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Terence Young (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 15 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 29

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Making Love (song) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Born to Love

Oasis (Roberta Flack album) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Born to Love

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 29 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 12

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jan Westcott, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chestnut Hill (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:24, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 26

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Someone That I Used to Love, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Starting Over Again (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:11, 26 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sausalito Summernight picture sleeve.jpg

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:09, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 6

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sausalito Summernight, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Santa Barbara (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:26, 6 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Sausalito Summernight picture sleeve.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Sausalito Summernight picture sleeve.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:58, 6 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 13

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Alicia Bridges, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cleveland County (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:11, 13 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Should I Do It

Hi, I'm Doomsdayer520. Cherrylimerickey, thanks for creating Should I Do It!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Thanks for your informative new article on the song "Should I Do It".

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 16:53, 18 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 20

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Just a Little Lovin', you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Look of Love (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 20 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Cherrylimerickey. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Eternal Flame (song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Like a Virgin (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:53, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 2

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Melba (1978 album) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to This Is It

This Is It (Melba Moore album) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to This Is It

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:12, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Edit to I Only Want to Be with You?

In this edit to "I Only Want to Be with You", you added <span style="color:white">1234</span> at various places. What was the reason for that? I don't understand. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 07:12, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 16

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Déjà Vu (Dionne Warwick song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jack Jones (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:37, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 12

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Making Love, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Author! Author! (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:02, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 23

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ain't No Way to Treat a Lady, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page No Way to Treat a Lady (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:41, 23 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 30

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited What Are You Doing the Rest of Your Life?, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Scott Walker and John Davidson (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:19, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:12, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 7

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Do I Hear a Waltz?, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jack Riley (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:40, 7 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 19

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Call Me Madam, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mark Baker (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 14:01, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 5

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited I'm on My Way, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jackie Moore (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:07, 5 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:24, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 21

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Spring Will Be a Little Late This Year

added links pointing to Medley, Steve Jordan, Another Time, Another Place, Harry Allen, John Eaton and Richard Maltby

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:13, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 11

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited It's Getting Better, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Make Your Own Kind of Music.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 18

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mama's Big Ones, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Easy Come Easy Go.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 18 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 25

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Make Your Own Kind of Music (song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page People Like Us.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 11

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Looped, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Santa Barbara.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:55, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 26

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Down in the Boondocks (song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Single.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 3

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Down in the Boondocks (song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page I Knew You When.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:53, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 15

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Phoebe Snow, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Let the Good Times Roll.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 24

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mame (musical), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages John Schneider and Michelle Lee.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 1

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mame (musical), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gordon Connell.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 17

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Lion in Winter, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Palm Beach and Robert Newman.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:39, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 29

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Something Real (Phoebe Snow album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Commercial.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 17

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of cover versions of Beach Boys songs, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page B. J. Ward.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on List of cover versions of Beach Boys songs

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page List of cover versions of Beach Boys songs, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 00:49, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:36, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]