User talk:CharlesWain

Your submission at Articles for creation: Soma Mondal has been accepted

Soma Mondal, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Rusalkii (talk) 04:01, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I am glad I am able to make little contributions to expand the scope of Wikipedia. I will try making quality contributions in future too. Thanks again !Dear Debasish (talk) 16:52, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Dispute resolution noticeboard discussion

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the WP:DRN regarding ongoing dispute related to inclusion of a statement in Origin section. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. The thread is "Pala Empire".The discussion is about the topic Pala Empire.

Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you!

--Ekdalian (talk) 11:57, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Copying from book by R. C. Majumdar

Hello CharlesWain! Your additions to Varendra have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. --Worldbruce (talk) 00:01, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please explain why Saradananda, 1978 is insufficiently reliable source on Ramakrishna article

Hello,

You made an edit saying Saradananda, Swami (1978). Sri Ramakrishna, the great master is an insufficiently reliable source. Could you please explain? As far I know, this is one of the primary sources of information on Ramakrishna being written by his direct disciple. RamasSquirrel (talk) 10:27, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hey RamasSquirrel, please read WP:Primary.CharlesWain (talk) 15:41, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks.

Just read it. The usage in Ramakrishna article from the primary source is straightforward and doesn't depend on any analysis, interpretation etc. In that case, it's use is not against the policy. Do you feel otherwise? RamasSquirrel (talk) 08:32, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

What are you proposing or planning to add, RamasSquirrel?CharlesWain (talk) 12:17, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

In another vision following Ramakrishna's birth, his mother saw a strange tall person lying in the bed instead of the baby Ramakrishna.^{[better source needed]}

The above line was added by me and you had added the 'better source needed' comment regarding the source of this line, which is Sri Ramakrishna the Great Master (1978). So I wanted to understand the reason behind the comment. RamasSquirrel (talk) 08:43, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:28, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Rani Rashmoni, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kalyani. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

To Check the mistakes in Hare Krishna Konar

I am new to Wikipedia but know many facts about Hare Krishna Konar and want to recorrect the article of Hare Krishna Konar but I am unable to do it, so can you please check grammatical or other mistakes in that article please do the needfulls. Privetwik (talk) 17:51, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Privetwik, whenever you add contents, please give citations. The article has multiple issues - grammar, spelling, sentence structure etc. A large part of the article is unsourced, and the style of writing in many sections doesn't suit encyclopaedia. I will work later.You make correct the mistakes and improve the article, if you want.CharlesWain (talk) 18:22, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ok! Thank You very much to you. Privetwik (talk) 18:44, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Vyas Smriti

According to Vyas Smriti Kayasthas are shudra. NIRANJAN CHATTERJEE (talk) 07:41, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic designated as contentious. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially-designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in South Asian social groups. Due to past disruption in this topic area, the community has authorised uninvolved administrators to impose contentious topics restrictions—such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks—on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, expected standards of behaviour, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on these sanctions. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Abecedare (talk) 18:48, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:44, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Shibakali Mondal for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Shibakali Mondal, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shibakali Mondal until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Baishya saha are baniyas

Hello charles why are you editing that false propaganda that pours a bad light on sahas . Sahas are baniyas they are buisnessman of bengal . Sahasworld (talk) 18:45, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Clarification and request for guidance

Respected sir, I'm new to Wikipedia Wisher08 (talk) 07:45, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Recently, I observed that a edit I had made in the Mahishya page got reversed by another user. I just want to know if the process I followed while making that edit did not align with the correct process in anyway. I feel you would be able to clarify my doubt Wisher08 (talk) 07:48, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Wisher08, Your statement is correct, but the source you added as citation was a blog which is considered unreliable. Read WP:RS. Thanks and regards,-CharlesWain (talk) 08:27, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you sir. You guidance is highly esteemed. Wisher08 (talk) 09:22, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@CharlesWain, I had added that name to the notable personality list of the Mahishya page, surmising from the fact that the surname is widely found in the Medinipur region, which is predominantly inhabited by the said caste. Moreover, the Tamluk Raj family which is vertably certified as Mahishyas, also had the said surname throughout history. Therefore, I surmised, albeit I'll admit I didn't have my source exactly stating it. This is to let you know that I did not make the edit in bad faith. I'll be delighted if you helped me find the suitable source. Thanks and regards. Wisher08 (talk) 17:16, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bhanja is not usually a Mahishya surname. Do you have any source supporting that Tamluk Raj family used Bhanja surname? As per as I know, they used to be Bhuiyan, and are now Roy. I will look into it. Thanks, Wisher08. CharlesWain (talk) 04:50, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you visit the page Tamluk and proceed to the "Landmarks and tourist places", you will find the Raj family refered to as the "Bhanj Dynasty" along with the source. Bhanja is generally a Oriya surname primarily used by the Khandayat community. I inferred that the Tamluk Raj family might have been a cadet branch of the Bhanja dynasty of Orissa. Since, most Mahishyas of Medinipur region similar/ same surnames with the Khandayats of the neighbouring state, I believed Bhanja to be a Mahishyas surname. Thanks, @CharlesWain. Wisher08 (talk) 07:21, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Mahishyas of Medinipur have Khandait connection, but what you have written here is WP:OR. Not sure of actor Sumit Bhanja, but Kanan Devi's adoptive father was Mahishya by caste. You may consider adding her to notable list.CharlesWain (talk) 07:53, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, but I couldn't find any suitable source corroborating that. Thanks and regards. Wisher08 (talk) 08:40, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wisher08, I probably have a source; I shall look into that later. CharlesWain (talk) 04:34, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I also found a source and utilised it as well! Regards. Wisher08 (talk) 15:22, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Akshardham (New Jersey)

Thanks for your contributions to the Swaminarayan Akshardham page. I noticed, though, that your recent edits are heavily focused on the lawsuit, which gives the article an unbalanced feel. Wikipedia guidelines emphasize a Neutral Point of View (NPOV) to ensure topics are covered fairly. The lawsuit is already mentioned thoroughly, so focusing just on that without expanding other sections makes the article seem one-sided. The talk page had previously decided to keep the lawsuit out of the introduction and as seen with the recent talk section about it, the consensus is that it ruins the balance of the article and pushes a non NPOV view. Ram112313 (talk) 17:51, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Inappropriate edit summary

Hello CharlesWain.. as an experienced editor, the following edit summary ([1]) is not expected from you: "Reverted 1 edit by Ekdalian (talk): Then help find one instead of reverting a good faith edit". I edit hundreds of articles and how do I assume good faith here and start searching for sources? You are well aware that as per WP:BURDEN, "the burden to demonstrate verifiability lies with the editor who adds or restores material, and it is satisfied by providing an inline citation to a reliable source that directly supports the contribution." This is an inappropriate edit summary and not an ideal behavior, especially since you are also aware of WP:GS/CASTE! You could have simply restored the content after adding a relevant source. This is just a friendly message to let you know what I expect from you. I shall leave it here. Thanks. Ekdalian (talk) 08:46, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Also, please don't forget to provide edit summaries. I am not posting the standard template (message), but would like to let you know that you have not provided edit summaries in your recent edits related to the above-mentioned article. Ekdalian (talk) 08:54, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Apology for a rather heated debate on trivial matters.

I admit that our discussion on the Ghoshal page was less than ideal. Since I was the first one to escalate the debate, it is only proper for me to apologize first. In my defense though, I have never engaged in bitter edit warring. I have only tried to reach consensus through debate. Most of my stuff is on the Talk pages. Am I an SPA? I don't know- I created this account to correct wrongs and bring other reputable sources to people's attention on a topic that most people on here have very little knowledge about. I am not a regular on the internet, let alone on Wikipedia... However, I do have the bad habit of sticking to a certain topic unless I have completely hammered my point across. However, I also understand the need for consensus on things like these. The topics I have dwelt on are already very niche and to be fair, quite unimportant and so, things around these parts are run by two or three experienced editors who kinda make all the decisions. I do hope we all can engage in constructive, honest debate in the Talk pages. I would again like to apologise for my beahviour yesterday, as it is important to be civil both in real life and the virtual one. :) Justaghost4 (talk) 05:39, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Carlleyle

There is an ongoing discussion on the topic. You cannot tag-team and revert edits without taking part in the discussion. Please revert your edit and allow the discussion to conclude. Upd Edit (talk) 11:37, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Source

Hi, can you provide a source for the caste recently added by an IP here? Thanks. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 12:07, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fylindfotberserk, I have sources, but you may not be able to verify as those are in Bengali. GC Denham, SP, on special duty in the criminal Intelligence Department, mentioned about Basanta Biswas, his background and caste in a report titled "Notes on Revolutionary Activity in Benares" dated July 19, 1915. Basanta Biswas was from a notable family of Nadia, and I have like half a dozen sources on their family history, but mention of caste only exist in Bengali sources except the mentioned police report.CharlesWain (talk) 04:32, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

OK, then please add one of those sources with quotation and trans-quotation. Thanks. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 08:42, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fylindfotberserk, I added a magazine, with translated quote, and a book mentioning about his grand uncle Digambar Biswas, leader of Indigo revolt. Hope this would be okay here. Thanks.CharlesWain (talk) 12:04, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nice. In the first reference you added [2], the title is in Bengali with English alphabets. It should be in Bengali alphabets, and you can add another parameter (trans-title) with a translated version of it in English. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 12:15, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Holidays!

Ekdalian (talk) is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!

Spread the cheer by adding {{subst:Xmas5}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Ekdalian (talk) 11:46, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Happy holidays!

	Happy holidays!
	Wishing you a Merry Christmas filled with love and joy, a Happy Holiday season surrounded by warmth and laughter, and a New Year brimming with hope, happiness, and success! 🎄🎉✨ Baqi:) (talk) 10:53, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]