User talk:Chandy of Pakalomattom

September 2019

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Mar Thoma Syrian Church and Reformed Eastern Christianity for the last months; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.
Please discuss the matter on the talk page or with the other editor before making any further reverts to the article. Chad The Goatman (talk) 19:39, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Dear User:Chad The Goatman

You are alleging a phenomenon which is not applicable to marthoma church.. Marthoma church is a episcopal, apostolic and traditional church. Where as Eastern reformed church as per the definition given is a church that follows calvanist and lutheran and other protestestent theology. Marthoma church is a misfit here . The reversions started from when a Wiki editor Macinderum started the disruptive acts to add this description to Marthoma church which donot have any secondary source or prevelence. Hence that description is not necessary hence it can be unkept. Which will end the continous edits . Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chandy of Pakalomattom (talk • contribs) 15:55, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Chandy of Pakalomattom. A complaint about your edits has been filed at my talk page. You can respond there if you wish. EdJohnston (talk) 22:32, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It won't for some reason never respond to other users like you, every time I undo its edits for how unironic it never backing up its claims, for the majority of other times, and how even its use of basic (American/British?) English is more worst than mine, due of my neurological disability. Chad The Goatman (talk) 19:52, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Mar Thoma Syrian Church, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 20:57, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

January 2020

Your recent editing history at Mar Thoma Syrian Church shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Escape Orbit ^(Talk) 17:04, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]