User talk:Cgchapman/sandbox

Name of student reviewer	Keronica Grant
Date of review	5/14/2013
Name of editor	Wikipedia User: Cgchapman
URL of editor’s Userpage	http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Cgchapman
Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page	05/14/13
Date review submitted to instructor	05/14/13
Length of edit (too long/too short)	good length
Image (needed/appropriate)	N/A
Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit)	N/A
Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed	Yes
Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych)	Accurate to I/O Psych
Wikiformatting	Good Formatting.
Grammar & composition	Good grammar.
Other comments	Good job! Keronica Grant (talk) 05:12, 15 May 2013 (UTC)

Case Study Pre-Edit Peer Review

Name of student reviewer	Wikipedia User:Ant_N_York
Date of review	5/14/2013
Name of editor	Wikipedia User: Cgchapman
URL of editor’s Userpage	http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Cgchapman
Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page	05/14/13
Date review submitted to instructor	05/14/13
Length of edit (too long/too short)	good length
Image (needed/appropriate)	N/A
Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit)	N/A
Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed	Yes
Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych)	Accurate to I/O Psych
Wikiformatting	Good Formatting.
Grammar & composition	Good grammar.
Other comments	Good job!

Pre-Edit Peer Review Feedback

Name of student reviewer	Wikipedia User:Neffateriet
Date of review	5/13/2013
Name of editor	Wikipedia User: Cgchapman
URL of editor’s Userpage	http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Cgchapman
Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page	05/13/13
Date review submitted to instructor	05/13/13
Length of edit (too long/too short)	Great length
Image (needed/appropriate)	Not need
Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit)	Correct
Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed	Yes
Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych)	Accurate to I/O Psych
Wikiformatting	Good Formatting.
Grammar & composition	No noticeable mistakes. Good grammar.
Other comments	Good job!

Neffateriet (talk) 11:02, 13 May 2013 (UTC)

Pre-Edit Peer Review Feedback

Name of student reviewer	Wikipedia User:Joselv83
Date of review	5/9/2013
Name of editor	Wikipedia User: Cgchapman
URL of editor’s Userpage	http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Cgchapman
Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page	05/9/13
Date review submitted to instructor	05/9/13
Length of edit (too long/too short)	Good Length
Image (needed/appropriate)	N/A
Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit)	Accurate
Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed	N/A
Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych)	Accurate to I/O Psych
Wikiformatting	Good Formatting.
Grammar & composition	No noticeable mistakes. Good grammar.
Other comments	Great topic, good job!

Joselv83 (talk) 17:34, 9 May 2013 (UTC)

Pre-Edit Peer Review Feedback

Name of student reviewer: Keronica Grant
Date of review	5/1/2013
Name of editor	Christina Chapman
URL of editor’s Userpage	http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Cgchapman/sandbox
Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page	04/24/13
Date review submitted to instructor	04/28/13
Length of edit (too long/too short)	good Enough.
Image (needed/appropriate)	None
Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit)	Accurate
Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed
Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych)
Wikiformatting	Good Formatting
Grammar & composition	Good grammar
Other comments	Good topic.

--Keronica Grant (talk) 19:06, 2 May 2013 (UTC)

Name of student reviewer **Replace with username for version on talk page** Wikipedia User: DJames5

Date of review- 5/6/13

Name of editor**Replace with username for version on talk page**- Cgchapman

URL of editor’s Userpage- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Cgchapman/sandbox

Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page- 5/6/13

Date review submitted to instructor- 5/6/13

Length of edit (too long/too short)- Too long Image (needed/appropriate)- n/a

Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit)- Accurate

Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed- Yes

Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych-) Yes

Wikiformatting- Good use of numbering

Grammar & composition- Good

Other comments- None DJames5 (talk) 16:15, 6 May 2013 (UTC)

Pre-Edit Peer Review Feedback

Name of student reviewer: Christina GeoHaghan	Wikipedia User: Christina geo
Date of review	5/1/2013
Name of editor	Christina Chapman
URL of editor’s Userpage	http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Cgchapman/sandbox
Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page	04/24/13
Date review submitted to instructor	04/28/13
Length of edit (too long/too short)	Perfect edit length. Enough sentences.
Image (needed/appropriate)	Not needed for topic being discussed
Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit)	Accurate
Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed	Yes
Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych)	Yes
Wikiformatting	Very Good Wiki Formatting
Grammar & composition	Good grammar and composition. No mistakes noticed when read.
Other comments	Good edit material and interesting topic picked.

--Christina geo (talk) 20:01, 1 May 2013 (UTC)

Name of student reviewer: Chanae woodyard	Wikipedia User: Nae0408
Date of review	5/11/2013
Name of editor	Christina Chapman
URL of editor’s Userpage	http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Cgchapman/sandbox
Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page	5/11/13
Date review submitted to instructor	5/11/13
Length of edit (too long/too short)	great
Image (needed/appropriate)	N/A
Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit)	Accurate
Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed	yes
Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych)	Accurate
Wikiformatting	Good Formatting
Grammar & composition	Good
Other comments	Great job

Nae0408 (talk) 16:52, 11 May 2013 (UTC)

Name of student reviewer	Wikipedia User:Nae0408
Date of review	5/13/2013
Name of editor	Wikipedia User:Cgchapman
URL of editor’s Userpage	http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Cgchapman/sandbox
Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page	5/13/13
Date review submitted to instructor	5/13/13
Length of edit (too long/too short)	Good length
Image (needed/appropriate)	N/A
Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit)	Accurate
Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed	yes
Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych)	Information is Accurate to I/O Psych textbook
Wikiformatting	Good formatting
Grammar & composition	Good grammar and composition
Other comments	Great job

Nae0408 (talk) 02:41, 14 May 2013 (UTC)

Pre edit peer review

Name of student reviewer	Wikipedia User: Joan Bailey
Date of review	5/15/2013
Name of editor	Wikipedia User: Cgchapman
URL of editor’s Userpage	http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Cgchapman/sandbox
Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page	05/15/13
Date review submitted to instructor	05/15/13
Length of edit (too long/too short)	The length of the edit is Good.
Image (needed/appropriate)	N/A
Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit)	Information is accurate.
Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed	N/A
Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych)	Information relates to I/O Psych
Wikiformatting	Formatting is good.
Grammar & composition	Grammar and composition is good.
Other comments	Nice! Joan Bailey (talk) 19:15, 15 May 2013 (UTC) Name of student reviewer Wikipedia User: Mtrowers Date of review 5/15/2013 Name of editor Wikipedia User: Cgchapman URL of editor’s Userpage http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Cgchapman/sandbox Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page 05/15/13 Date review submitted to instructor 05/15/13 Length of edit (too long/too short) Good length, not too long Image (needed/appropriate) N/A Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit) Information is precise. Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed N/A Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych) Information relates to I/O Psychology Wikiformatting Good format. Grammar & composition Good grammar. Other comments Nice! Mtrowers (talk) 15:21, 16 May 2013 (UTC)