User talk:Cdguy06
Your recent edit to Dippel (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // MartinBot 03:24, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
Caution: Vandalism on Westbrook Intermediate School. using TW
[edit]May 2007
[edit]
Please do not add unhelpful and unconstructive content to Wikipedia, as you did to Westbrook Intermediate School. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. D0t 23:47, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article Westbrook Intermediate School, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Funpika 23:47, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
Re: Westbrook Intermediate School article
[edit]Your warning to not edit the article is inappropriate. Editing is not restricted to students of the school. Please read WP:NOT — this is not your personal website/blog. This is a serious encyclopedia. If you, or other students from the school insist on making the article a site for your social commentary, the edits will be reverted and you risk being blocked from editing. — ERcheck (talk) 03:01, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did to Westbrook Intermediate School, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Also see WP:BLP — you need to have verifable references with respect to living people, such as the teachers at the school. If you can provide such references about the teacher in the movies, go ahead and add. Otherwise, you must leave it out. — ERcheck (talk) 03:09, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
Image tagging for Image:CIMG0207.JPG
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:CIMG0207.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 02:08, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
Your edits
[edit]Please read up on Wikipedia policies, especially Wikipedia:Ownership of articles. You do not own the article. Your edits need to follow policy. Articles are not about what you know about the school. The information must be able to be backed up by reliable sources. You will be blocked if you continue — then you can take time to read about how to edit in Wikipedia.
This is your last warning. The next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. — ERcheck (talk) 03:12, 8 May 2007 (UTC)