User talk:Cclehnen

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Cclehnen! Thank you for your contributions. I am Charlesdrakew and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{helpme}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Charles (talk) 20:48, 10 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

{{helpme}} Hey Charlesdrakew! I had a question on image copyrights. I found an excellent resource for historic images that I would like to add to a page I am working on about the historic district I live in. However, I am confused about the copyright designation. The book is free for download through Google Books and was published in 1941. Google writes "This book is provided in digital form with the permission of the rightsholder as part of a Google project to make the world's books discoverable online

The rightsholder has graciously given you the right to download all pages of this book. No commercial or other uses have been granted

Note that all copyrights remain reserved." Does that mean that I would be unable to upload a picture from the book to reference in a Wikipedia article? Thanks! ~~Cclehnen~~

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!

Hello! Cclehnen, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Charles (talk) 20:49, 10 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Primary Authored Pages

Students’ Co-op

Hi Cclehnen. I saw that you were working on an article for Students' Co-op and thought I'd say hi. Let me know if you need any help. You might also find assistance at the Minnesota or Cooperatives WikiProjects. Cheers, Gobōnobo ⁺ ^c 22:01, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Gobōnobo! Yes, I have been hard at work creating a highly accurate, well-cited, informative page on the Students' Co-op and its frequently convoluted history. What is your connection to the Students' Co-op? ~~Cclehnen~~ (oh, and I guess the main trouble I've come across so far is finding historical photos of the building to use that aren't under copyright. I have a couple from the book "Annals of Psi Upsilon; 1888-1941" and some from different versions of the UMN yearbook "The Gopher", but don't know how I would go about asking permission to the rights for these for the Wikipedia page. Do you have any advice?)

Thanks for your support and advice!

I've no connection to the co-op, but I'm familiar with it. Historical photos of the building might be difficult unless you can find some published before 1923. First though, it would be best to make sure that Students' Co-op meets Wikipedia's notability guideline, otherwise the article could end up deleted. A quick look through online resources doesn't look very promising to me. Barrington Hall (Berkeley, California) has good examples of the sort of references needed. Significant mentions in books, newspaper articles or magazines would do the trick. Being part of the Fraternity Row Historic District will help, especially if there are reliable sources that discuss the building's architecture/history, but wouldn't guarantee anything. I'd suggest first collecting and listing all the resources you've got to see if an article is possible. Gobōnobo ⁺ ^c 17:07, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Gobōnobo! Great, I have some historic photos from "the Gopher" yearbook from 1920 that I'll be able to use then. I was fielding the question of notability myself, especially because I found we once had a not very well-cited Wiki page that was pulled for lack of citations and lack of proof of significant notability, but think that the Students' Co-op can hold water in this respect. Although no Barrington Hall, here's the current ideas I have for students' co-op notability:

we are a historic home, part of a historic district, 2nd oldest house on UMN Greek row, have had many notable past-residents (a pioneer in the field of epidimiology in the 1950s, a Jamacain embassador, the first African-American student to live on UMN fraternity row, an advisor on the education board of LBJ,...), are one of the oldest remaining student housing cooperatives in the united states, one of the first members of the North American Students of Cooperation (NASCO) (citation for the last 2 still needed :/ but the historian from NASCO informed me of this and has been helping me gather information), have been mentioned specifically in the Minnesota Daily many times over the past 70 years, in the Cooperative Builder, in Gopher Yearbooks, and in local newspapers.

The primary source citations I currently have:

Cooperative Builder (1939, 1940, 1941)
Select UMN Gopher Yearbooks (1920)
Mentions in the Minnesota Daily (1939-present)
Minneapolis Heritage and Preservation Commission info on our home (1908-1940)

Where I plan to look next:

Local newspaper articles
More citations from UMN Gopher Yearbooks
Primary sources showing we were one of the first student co-ops from NASCO

Then of course less historic stuff on how we run and who we are by just citing our website and internal documents directly

I hope it will all be enough, but of course the Wikipedia community at large will have the final say. Let me know if you have any further tips in directions I could go in! ~~Cclehnen~~

That's a decent start and it's good that you're talking to NASCO, as they may know of more references. Book references and newspaper articles would help, ideally Star Tribune or anything with a broader readership. Notable residents (if sourced) will help, as will keeping the focus on the history and the architecture. If the article is brought to AfD, they'll be scrutinizing the quality of your sources and be looking at these links:

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

And those links are pretty useless given the number of false positives. I'll let you know if I come across any good references. If you haven't already seen it, this page looks helpful. Contacting the Minnesota Historical Society might also be worthwhile if you're really determined. Gobōnobo ⁺ ^c 21:13, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Cclehnen. You have new messages at Charlesdrakew's talk page.
Message added 17:36, 18 April 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Charles (talk) 17:36, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Cclehnen. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Writ Keeper ⚇♔ 17:37, 19 April 2012 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template.[reply]

Please fill out our brief Teahouse guest survey

Hello fellow Wikipedian, the hardworking hosts and staff at WP:Teahouse would like your feedback! We have created a brief survey meant to help us better understand the experience of new editors on Wikipedia. You are being selected to participate in our survey because you edited the Teahouse Questions or Guests pages sometime in the last few months.

Click here to be taken to the survey site.

The survey should take less than 10 minutes to complete. We really appreciate your feedback, and we look forward to your next vist to the Teahouse!

Happy editing,

J-Mo, Teahouse host

This message was sent via Global message delivery on 00:27, 22 May 2012 (UTC)

Yoh! Christmas (TV series) moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Yoh! Christmas (TV series). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. ARandomName123 (talk)^{Ping me!} 20:56, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, thanks very much! I added more sources and more depth to the article so hopefully that is sufficient. Cclehnen (talk) 04:30, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Yoh! Christmas (TV series) (December 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by WikiOriginal-9 was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Yoh! Christmas (TV series) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 00:01, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Yoh! Christmas (TV series) has been accepted

Yoh! Christmas (TV series), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Toadette ^{(Happy holiday!)} 09:13, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]