User talk:Catmando999/Archive 3
This is an archive of past discussions with User:Catmando999. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 |
This is an archive of past discussions from user talk:Catmando999. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive created on the 30/09/2015; disscusions from: user talk:Catmando999
Archive 1 Archive 2 Archive 3 Archive 4
capitalization of "m" in men's
Following the precedent of all yearly pages in men's college basketball, the m should not be capitalized. If you think that should be changed, changing it on one place is not the way to start. Mjs32193 (talk) 03:57, 20 September 2015 (UTC)
Iraqi insurgency (2011–14)
Thanks to you too. I will always be happy to respond. Then you need more corrections. I hope it will be still a little work to somehow details about templates.--Baba Mica (talk) 03:42, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
Alan Moore (war artist)
Re this - I'd been working on an article in my sandbox for the last day or two.... Mitch Ames (talk) 07:34, 27 September 2015 (UTC)
You have done a complete rewrite. Thank you. Out of five how would you rate my original article? Catmando999 Check out his talk page! 07:37, 27 September 2015 (UTC)
- It was evidently still only a stub, so it's not really fair to try to rate it on a scale. Generally what was there was reasonable. There were a few minor style issues, but they would have been trivial to fix. Mitch Ames (talk) 07:44, 27 September 2015 (UTC)
- Actually, looking back at your version -- in particular the "Works" paragraph that you re-inserted, and which I merged back into "After the war" -- there was a bit of a problem. The statement that "Moore's paintings were mainly of concentration camps" is not supported by any reference that I could find. As editors, we must be careful that what we write is verifiably true, per WP:VERIFY, which is why I removed that statement.
- However, you did get get the number of his works ("more than 200"), which I'd missed, so thanks for that. Mitch Ames (talk) 01:41, 28 September 2015 (UTC)
- Thank you. I will continue to try to improve the page. Catmando999 Check out his talk page! 01:43, 28 September 2015 (UTC)
- OK, but please be sure that your improvements are factually accurate and verifiable. (See my revision comments [1][2] - we need to avoid saying things that are not directly supported by the references. You might want to read WP:SYN.) Mitch Ames (talk) 02:08, 28 September 2015 (UTC)
- Ok, I'll keep that is mind. Catmando999 Check out his talk page! 05:24, 28 September 2015 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Alan Moore (war artist) (disambiguation)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that Alan Moore (war artist) (disambiguation), a page that you created, has been tagged for deletion. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
- It covers a topic on which we already have an article - Alan Moore (war artist). (See section A10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Alan Moore (war artist), or to discuss new information at the article's talk page.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. -- Sam Sailor Talk! 07:52, 27 September 2015 (UTC)
- Go ahead I created that page by accident. Catmando999 Check out his talk page! 07:57, 27 September 2015 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 27
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Alan Moore (war artist), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bergen-Belsen. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:44, 27 September 2015 (UTC)
- The disambiguation link was subsequently removed in this edit. Mitch Ames (talk) 01:25, 28 September 2015 (UTC)
User categories
I notice that your user page is in Category:Australia and Category:New South Wales, both of which are mainspace/article categories. WP:USERCAT#Categorization says that "User pages and user categories do not belong in mainspace categories", so you should probably remove those categories from your user page. Mitch Ames (talk) 12:26, 1 October 2015 (UTC)
- I removed Category:New South Wales but, for someone reason I am running into difficulty with removing Category:Australia. It might be because it's there from a userbox. Catmando999 Check out his talk page! 22:11, 1 October 2015 (UTC)
Category:Australia was there because my "Australian Patriot" userbox had that category. I have removed that category now.
What is happening at Charles Herbert Locke. Why did you call for its deletion? You have made poor edits and added a badly cropped pic. Is this vandalism? Castlemate (talk) 01:49, 3 October 2015 (UTC)
- Castlemate, you might remember to assume good faith rather than suggest vandalism. The deletion request was almost certainly a simple error, which was reverted by Catmando999 himself soon afterwards. As for badly cropped pics - that's what it looks like at the source - fortunately it is easily fixed. Mitch Ames (talk) 02:21, 3 October 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks Mitch. You are right, it was an accident. Thanks for fixing the picture. Catmando999 Check out his talk page! 03:03, 3 October 2015 (UTC)
- By the way Castlemate, I have answered your queries on the article in question's talk page. Catmando999 Check out his talk page! 03:09, 3 October 2015 (UTC)
Location of image on your user page
On your user page, please move the image File:Glaive G-42a (PSF).png so that it is not <span style="position: absolute ...>
. This puts the image on top of the navigation, interaction, tools men on the left side of the browser window. At best, it makes that menu difficult to read, and on some skins (eg MonoBook) it hides the menu. WP:SMI suggest that this is not a good idea. Mitch Ames (talk) 01:44, 4 October 2015 (UTC)
Albury
Heyo Catmando999. I see that you nominated the article for GAR and also started the review page, which is wrong. Please have a look at the this page for instructions. Once the article has been nominated, an another editor who is not involved with the article will start the review page. Until then, the review page is not to be created and certainly not by the nominator. Due to the large pile of nominations, it takes a bit of time before an editor comes and reviews the page. All you have to do after nominating the article is to wait. If you create the review page, it just confuses editors and the page might not be reviewed at all or it might look that you intentionally started the review page in bad faith to promote your nomination (I am not saying that you did, but this is what it might appear to be). I suggest you blank the review page and nominate it for deletion. Once the review page gets deleted, you'll have to wait for a while and a different editor will come and review the page. I hope you understand and if you have any questions or if you feel confused, feel free to contact me. I am here to help :) Regards, Yash! 04:18, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
The Signpost: 14 October 2015
- WikiConference report: US gathering sees speeches from Andrew Lih, AfroCrowd, and the Archivist of the United States
- News and notes: 2015–2016 Q1 fundraising update sparks mailing list debate
- Traffic report: Screens, Sport, Reddit, and Death
- Featured content: A fistful of dollars
- Technology report: Tech news in brief
Wow!!!
Wow, you sure move fast. I changed it because I thought a pic of the scene of the crime was particularly relevant to the article. The image showing the location was also reasonably relevant, so I just moved it down a bit. There's no point being too thin-skinned about things like this. It happens all the time at Wiki. I used to get worked up over these things, but eventually you start to realize that these things happen all the time at Wiki, so you just have to learn to adjust to it. If you really really really can't stand the way the images are arranged, you can always swap them around. I won't revert them.
Sardaka (talk) 08:28, 21 October 2015 (UTC)
- Okay. I'm not going to change them. I just thought that the black and white image looked too dramatic. Catmando999 Check out his talk page! 20:20, 21 October 2015 (UTC)
There's a colour version if you prefer that, but personally I think the B&W version is better.Sardaka (talk) 01:12, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
- I prefer it as well. Catmando999 Check out his talk page! 03:09, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
The Signpost: 21 October 2015
- Editorial: Women and Wikipedia: the world is watching
- In the media: "Wikipedia's hostility to women"
- Special report: One year of GamerGate, or how I learned to stop worrying and love bare rule-level consensus
- Featured content: A more balanced week
- Arbitration report: Four ArbCom cases ongoing
- Traffic report: Hiding under the covers of the Internet
- Technology report: Tech news in brief
Logos
Maybe an option is the green kangaroo (minus the yellow background) with WP:AUSTRALIA underneath (similar to Canada) or the Australian Kangaroo with the Australian flag inserted inside (instead of just plain green or black). Although I do like but with WP:Australia underneath. Dan arndt (talk) 10:00, 26 October 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks for the suggestions. Feel free to use mine to make your own! Catmando999 Check out his talk page! 10:04, 26 October 2015 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Henk van de Ven
The article Henk van de Ven has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Notability not established, fails WP:POLITICIAN
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WWGB (talk) 10:32, 26 October 2015 (UTC)
Nomination of Henk van de Ven for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Henk van de Ven is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Henk van de Ven until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. WWGB (talk) 23:59, 26 October 2015 (UTC)
Hi
Hey there, and a belated welcome. I hope you're enjoying editing, and that you decide to stay - we can always use more enthusiastic people at the Australian project. I came across you at the Hank van de Ven AfD, and though I've gone delete for now, I'm very open to convincing if you can provide the sources. It's usually useful in AfDs to link to as many relevant sources as you can, or include them in the article, as these are your strongest argument against deletion. Remember you want to prove the sources are there, not just assert that they are.
I also just wanted to say that I came across some of your subpages as I was browsing through your contributions (as I often do for new Australian editors I haven't seen before). Some of them, I'm afraid, aren't really appropriate under our user page policy (specifically the ones you've tagged with humour - this, this, this and this - that's all very well, but they still have to be related to Wikipedia in some way, not just random in-jokes). I would gently advise you to find somewhere else to host these - you can always link to them from your userpage if you want to, but Wikipedia is not a host for personal stuff like this.
Anyway, welcome again and do stick around! Frickeg (talk) 11:42, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
- Well, it'a gone now. Catmando999 Check out his talk page! 08:03, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
Invitation to join MILHIST
Welcome to MILHIST
Hello and welcome to the Military history WikiProject! As you may have guessed, we're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to military history.
A few features that you might find helpful:
- Our navigation box points to most of the useful pages within the project.
- The announcement and open task box is updated very frequently. You can watchlist it if you are interested, or you can add it directly to your user page by copying the following: {{WPMILHIST Announcements}}.
- Important discussions take place on the project's main discussion page; it is highly recommended that you watchlist it.
- The project has several departments, which handle article quality assessment, detailed article and content review, writing contests, and article logistics.
- We have a number of task forces that focus on specific topics, nations, periods, and conflicts.
- We've developed a set of guidelines that cover article structure and content, template use, categorization, and many other issues of interest.
- If you're looking for something to work on, there are many articles that need attention, as well as a number of review alerts.
If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask any of the project coordinators or any other experienced member of the project, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome, and we are looking forward to seeing you around! Anotherclown (talk) 22:21, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
Zaqistan OR
You added an OR banner to Zaqistan but didn't leave a note about what it was specifically for. I would like to remove the banner since the only statement marked OR was removed 21:47, 27 October 2015. But if there really is an issue could you please leave a note on the article's talkpage; I will check it first. – Brianhe (talk) 03:23, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
The Points of Interest section is completely unsourced. Catmando999 Check out his talk page! 05:07, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
- Since that section is gone now, I assume you don't have a problem with my removing the banner. – Brianhe (talk) 17:36, 30 October 2015 (UTC)
- Yes, that is fine. Catmando999 Check out his talk page! 21:02, 30 October 2015 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Holocaust horror, blind man walking through the Belsen concentration camp.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Holocaust horror, blind man walking through the Belsen concentration camp.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:29, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
The Signpost: 28 October 2015
- From the editor: The Signpost's reorganization plan—we need your help
- News and notes: English Wikipedia reaches five million articles
- In the media: The world's Wikipedia gaps; Google and Wikipedia accused of tying Ben Carson to NAMBLA
- Arbitration report: A second attempt at Arbitration enforcement
- Traffic report: Canada, the most popular nation on Earth
- Recent research: Student attitudes towards Wikipedia; Jesus, Napoleon and Obama top "Wikipedia social network"; featured article editing patterns in 12 languages
- Featured content: Birds, turtles, and other things
- Technology report: Tech news in brief
- Community letter: Five million articles
A cookie for you!
Hallo Sige |д・) 02:13, 6 November 2015 (UTC) |
- Thanks for the biscuit but what's it for? Catmando999 Check out his talk page! 03:18, 6 November 2015 (UTC)
The Signpost: 04 November 2015
- News and notes: Wikimedia Foundation finances; Superprotect is gone
- In the media: Ahmadiyya Jabrayilov: propaganda myth or history?
- Traffic report: Death, the Dead, and Spectres are abroad
- Featured content: Christianity, music, and cricket
- Technology report: Tech news in brief
Disambiguation link notification for November 9
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited James Barrett (academic), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page South Melbourne. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:41, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
The Signpost: 11 November 2015
- Arbitration report: Elections, redirections, and a resignation from the Committee
- Discussion report: Compromise of two administrator accounts prompts security review
- Featured content: Texas, film, and cycling
- In the media: Sanger on Wikipedia; Silver on Vox; lawyers on monkeys
- Traffic report: Doodles of popularity
- Gallery: Paris
Disambiguation link notification for November 16
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Lavington Sports Ground, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lavington. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:57, 16 November 2015 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CXVI, November 2015
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 03:26, 18 November 2015 (UTC)
The Signpost: 18 November 2015
- Special report: ArbCom election—candidates’ opinions analysed
- In the media: Icelandic milestone; apolitical editing
- Discussion report: BASC disbanded; other developments in the discussion world
- Arbitration report: Ban Appeals Subcommittee goes up in smoke; 21 candidates running
- Featured content: Fantasia on a Theme by Jimbo Wales
- Traffic report: Darkness and light
Not quite sure what you're thinking here. Lists are not eligible for GA. The relevant recognised content is featured list, but the article doesn't come close to qualifying for that. (It has been a periodic intention of mine to get it there, but it has a long, long way to go.) Might be a good idea to familiarise yourself with the good article criteria before you go nominating any more. :) Frickeg (talk) 23:11, 22 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:08, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
The Signpost: 25 November 2015
- News and notes: Fundraising update; FDC recommendations
- Featured content: Caves and stuff
- Traffic report: J'en ai ras le bol
- Arbitration report: Third Palestine-Israel case closes; Voting begins
- Technology report: Tech news in brief
The Signpost: 02 December 2015
- Op-ed: Whither Wikidata?
- Traffic report: Jonesing for episodes
- Featured content: This Week's Featured Content
- Technology report: Tech news in brief
Nominations for the Military history WikiProject historian and newcomer of the year awards now open!
On behalf of the Military history WikiProject's Coordinators, we would like to extend an invitation to nominate deserving editors for the 2015 Military historian of the year and Military history newcomer of the year awards. The nomination period will run from 7 December to 23:59 13 December, with the election phase running from 14 December to 23:59 21 December. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:05, 7 December 2015 (UTC)
The Signpost: 09 December 2015
- News and notes: ArbCom election results announced
- Gallery: Wiki Loves Monuments 2015 winners
- Traffic report: So do you laugh, or does it cry?
- Featured content: Sports, ships, arts... and some other things
- Technology report: Tech news in brief
The Signpost: 16 December 2015
- In the media: Wales in China; #Edit2015
- Arbitration report: GMO case decided
- Featured content: An unusually slow week
- WikiProject report: Women in Red—using teamwork and partnerships to elevate online and offline collaborations
- Traffic report: A feast of Spam
The Bugle: Issue CXVII, December 2015
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 05:06, 24 December 2015 (UTC)