Jump to content

User talk:Cassiopeia/Archive 3

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1Archive 2Archive 3Archive 4Archive 5→Archive 10

Rose Namajunas

I'm trying to understand your reverting of my last edit on Rose Namajunas. The note you pointed to (which I had read and referred to) states "unless sources within the body text of the article state otherwise, always use the result that is available in a fighter's record at Sherdog Fight Finder". Her record at Sherdog says TKO, as I indicated. The text in place now, as left by you, is in conflict with that statement. 24.149.37.234 (talk) 01:14, 14 February 2018 (UTC)

My apologies if I'm misreading that, but it seems clear to me. 24.149.37.234 (talk) 01:16, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
@24.149.37.234:, Greetings to you. Thank you for the question and pointed out the conflict between the body text vs the source, as I have changed from TKO to KO after your message above. As per Wiki MMA project guidelines on Method (point 2), pls see WP:MMABOX. "Method" - unless sources within the boy text of the article state otherwise, always use the results that is available in the fither's record at Sherdog Fight Finder. The body text (I have change from TKO to KO) is based on the source from MMAJunkie [1], inidcated KO instead of TKO. Other regular sources could be found the same on TKO as method here [2] and [3]. Hope this clear up the confusion and have a good day. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 06:46, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
It's very interesting, because I read the source as saying it is a TKO ("called a knockout"), which is different than how you are reading it. Their records state "TKO". The official UFC web site currently says "KO/TKO", so maybe that's a better choice. [4] 24.149.37.234 (talk) 19:15, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
@24.149.37.234:, Good day. This is the source from the body text of Rose Namajunas stating KO - [5] this is secondary independent source and UFC is a primary source. Thank you. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 19:34, 17 February 2018 (UTC)

List of most-viewed YouTube videos

Hello, I'm RX22. To make the edit, I checked out the history of the page. The last edit in each year (2015, 2016 and 2017) says that the number of videos with one billion views was 15, 44 and 90. If this can not be the edit's citation, I am sorry, I did not know about it before. RX22 (talk) 13:06, 17 February 2018 (UTC)RX22

@RX22:, Hi Greetings. Thank you for understanding. All content added or edited needs to support by independent source for verification in Wikipedia. Pls see reliable source here WP:RS and verification here WP:V for further information. Have a good day. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 13:24, 17 February 2018 (UTC)

Rustam, Mardan

Thank you for corrections. But I really have some very good information about Sudham Rustam. Which I want to publicize on Wikipedia. Waiting for your kind response. Sulaiman.lodhi3 (talk) 16:07, 20 February 2018 (UTC)

@Sulaiman.lodhi3:, Greetings to you. Your edits on Rustam, Mardan were reverted because they not supported by independent reliable source for verification as per the guidelines of Wikipedia, please see reliable source here WP:RS and verification here WP:V. I noticed you have added many such edits after my message, please add the source/reference accordingly or they will be removed. Thank you and have a good day. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 17:03, 20 February 2018 (UTC)

Women's History Month 2018 at Women in Red

Welcome to Women in Red's March 2018 worldwide online editathons.


Historically, our March event has been one of the biggest offerings of the year. This year, we are collaborating with two other wiki communities. Our article campaign is the official on-line/virtual node for Art+Feminism. Our image campaign supports the Whose Knowledge? initiative. Women's History Month 2018

Continuing: #1day1woman Global Initiative

(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Rosiestep (talk) 16:08, 20 February 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging

My edit to Jamie Morrison

Ok fairish point though i felt it was constructive as hes not the only dude and i am a little bit of a cheeky legend ;p

so how do i get onto wikipedia then? or is itjust for celebs and special folk? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 31.52.137.121 (talk) 16:16, 20 February 2018 (UTC)

@31.52.137.121:, Hi, Greetings. I have sent you a welcome message on your talk page. There are many topics would be of your interest in learning how to edit /contribution in Wikipedia. I would strongly suggest you to go through Wikipedia:Adventure which would only take 5 -10 mins of your time. Once again, welcome to Wikipedia and have a good day. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 16:46, 20 February 2018 (UTC)

The Signpost: 20 February 2018

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:12, 20 February 2018 (UTC)

Astrud Gilberto Wikipedia Page

Well, recently I discovered that many english talkers didnt know that "the girl of ipanema" suffers from Stage Fright, and on doing so, I change the wiki page adding the setence bellow:

Astrud almost didn't initiate your career because of stage fright and shyness, but her friend Nara Leão encouraged her to sing.

- You can see that information on the Portuguese version of her page in wikipedia.

I didn't understand why you revogate the change in question. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2804:7F7:DC80:FEDF:2CE4:47CB:526D:72DC (talk) 17:24, 20 February 2018 (UTC)

@2804:7F7:DC80:FEDF:2CE4:47CB:526D:72DC: Good day. Please note that content added or edited need to be supported by independent reliable source for verification. see reliable source WP:RS and verification here WP:V. I have check the wiki es site but can find the source. If you could find the source ( in any language) you could add back the content and remember to site the source. See how to web citing here WP:WEBCITE. Thank you. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 17:32, 20 February 2018 (UTC)

I have unreviewed a page you curated - Aung Kyaw Htet(artist)

Thanks for reviewing Aung Kyaw Htet(artist), CASSIOPEIA.

Unfortunately SamHolt6 has just gone over this page again and unreviewed it. Their note is:

Article creator has removed PROD, which is fine, but also removed all other tags. Unreviewing to be safe

To reply, leave a comment on SamHolt6's talk page.

SamHolt6 (talk) 00:30, 21 February 2018 (UTC)

@SamHolt6:, Thanks for informing SamHolt6, understand and saw the movement of the actions. Have a good day. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 06:47, 21 February 2018 (UTC)

A picture of Craig as Philly sees him - Winston Craig

File:File-Boer Goat (8742860752).jpg

Thanks for looking at my article for Winston Craig. Fly Eagles Fly!

Kkuchnir (talk) 21:03, 21 February 2018 (UTC)

@Kkuchnir:, Happy editing and thanks for the contribution to Wikipedia. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 07:09, 22 February 2018 (UTC)

add movie poster to a movle article

hello cassiopeia, im new to wiki. thanks for the correction. look forward to more friendly guidance in future. id like to know how may i add poster image to the articles im editing at the moment. they are not created by me and i seem to get rejected everytime i post. Ive seen some other local movie articles that have their images added although they are not sourced from the movie production. example: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Journey_(2014_Malaysian_film)

please help. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Afifi N. (talk • contribs) 05:20, 22 February 2018 (UTC)

@Afifi N.: Hi good day and thank you for the question. Images place in Wikipedia need to adhere to Free of use policy - see here WP:IUP#COPYRIGHT, some images that could be free of use could be found here - MOS:HOTLINK and please read through image use policy on WP:IUP. You could use your own work (image) and upload to Wikipedia:Wikimedia Commons - Pls see WP:UPIMAGE and Wikipedia:File Upload Wizard. Thank you. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 07:04, 22 February 2018 (UTC)

HMS Eglinton

I'm relatively inexperienced so please forgive and correct me if I am doing anything wrong. I'm a bit surprised that you have marked the page I have just created for HMS Eglinton for deletion. There are hundreds of similar pages on wikipedia when the same name has been used for more than one ship. It's a pretty essential tool for the user who is searching for a ship name to see that it could be one of two or more ships. Currently yes only one of the ships has a wikipedia entry but the other meets the notability criteria and will be created in time making the page I created essentialLyndaship (talk) 13:08, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
@Lyndaship: Greetings. The pages you created contain a non wikipedia page/article HMS Eglinton (1916) for such I dont see reason to have a disambiguation page. I have check on HMS Eglinton title names in Wikipedia and I could only find one - see here [6]; however, editor could disam HMS or Eglinton (already there are pages of those two) as there are many pages have related names of such - see here Eglinton and HMS. When articles of title of HMS Eglinton xxx have created then a disam page could and welcome to be created. I believe I have answered you question, and should I didnt, kindly let me know. Thank you and happy editing. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 13:36, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
@Lyndaship:, Hi, you have just created the page HMS Eglinton (1916) for such I have withdraw the nomination from AfD. Thank you for your contribution and happy editing. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 14:15, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
I thought that was the simplest way to resolve. I still do think though that ship index pages are needed regardless of if the articles have yet been created or not. Thanks for withdrawing deletion proposal. Lyndaship (talk) 14:21, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
@Lyndaship:, hi please do understand no bad faith intended as I have not seen anywhere in Wikipedia indicate such as I might have missed it. Than you for your contribution Lyndaship. Have a good night. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 14:27, 22 February 2018 (UTC)

Akilnathan Logeswaran

Hey Cassiopeia, thank you for reviewing the Akilnathan Logeswaran article. What is the best approach to find a proofreader? I realized that almost all de-en proofreaders are inactive. Any recommendation on this? Best Regards, --Wedderkop (talk) 09:44, 22 February 2018 (UTC)

@Wedderkop: Greetings to you and thank you for the question. the proofreader from de to en page is inactive - see here Wikipedia:Translation/ de/Proofreaders Needed. However, here are the users who have registered as the proofreader from de to en - see here Category:Proofreaders de-en. I have added "Category:Proofreaders Needed/de|Proofreaders Needed/de " on Akilnathan Logeswaran page, and as all content and works done in Wikipedia are the voluntary for I hope someone would come along to help on this matter. Thank you for your contribution and have a wonderful day. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 10:35, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
Thank you for your feedback Cassiopeia, I've been through 20+ profiles of proofreaders de-en, but there is not a single user with contributions in 2018. The category that you have added is also inactive. As a native German speaker and author of the German article, I can say that the article has not only been translated, but extended. Where does your need for additional proofreading come from? --Wedderkop (talk) 01:48, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
@Wedderkop: I know that you are both the creator of the en and de of the same article. When I placed the tag, the translation I got form de to en is very similar that of en article. I also noticed you have made further edits after. I do not know German language and understand proofreader editors currently are in active. Since you are both the de and en creator of this article. I will lift the tag. Thank you for your contribution and have a good day. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 01:57, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
Thank you for your support, Cassiopeia! --Wedderkop (talk) 08:57, 23 February 2018 (UTC)

FRAP full tissue - is a method with file data at V Cell 6

Should the title, or nomenclature of method, escape review or competence,

Dr. Les Loew, University of Conn., is estimated available via email, thus

informative to atypical review at research intersection, data existance.

Frap full tissue has had significant impact upon oncogene specific dose builds.

mmcgary44 talk page, exists to amplify the primate, tumor specific

data currently impacting typical IND dose build, binding competence,

typical IND submission.

I humbly welcome assistance to best quantify FRAP method.

Why?

Because the import of full field, as Frap method in full tissue descriptor,

is coherent in scope to:

JOURNAL ARTICLE The Chemical Basis of Morphogenesis A. M. Turing Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences Vol. 237, No. 641 (Aug. 14, 1952), pp. 37-72

Should the reviewer have method, encylopedic transaction beyond the submitting authors end use, I would welcome the amplifing success typical to the more fundamental Touring publication. *shown just above.

In specific regard, the frap photo bleach diffusion is well quantified via Touring's coherent reaction data in multiples of exemplar. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mmcgary44 (talk • contribs) 14:27, 23 February 2018 (UTC)

@Mmcgary44: Hi Good afternoon, as regards to your article Frap full tissue, the result of the deletion could be found here (please clik) Talk:Frap full tissue. I also know that the user RHaworth has wrote you on your talk page on the article to move to draft or sandbox. Kindly revert to RHaworth if you wish. Thank you. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 14:47, 23 February 2018 (UTC)

Virgil Abloh - Wikipedia edits

I had deleted a portion of the wikipedia article on virgil abloom because I had made those edits and would like to use them on a sandbox rather than on the official page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Adam C. Fields (talk • contribs) 17:30, 24 February 2018 (UTC)

@Adam C. Fields:, Greetings to you. I noticed some of the deleted texts were input by you which you had tried to delete that I resorted. The input texts are sourced and relevant for such just keep it in Virgil Abloh page. If you want to use the text for other creation, you would do so for your texts but for other editors texts to reuse, you need to pay proper attribution - see here WP:PATT. For a few sentences, pls indicate the editor name and page title and indicate proper attribution on the edit summary Help:ES. But if the text consitute a large amount, then you need to write on your own words for content. Thank you and happy editing. (by the way, pls sign off when you finish you message by placing four tildes ~~~~. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 17:56, 24 February 2018 (UTC)

List of Disney Channel original films - Your strange actions

Hello, you reverted my edit and told as a reason of your action:

What did you mean!?
Who exactly removed which exactly content?! You by reverting my edit? So why? - try to explain it.
Maybe me? Which exactly content I removed and which way?!

At the same time, I'm gonna tell you which one information and wikification you removed by making you action.

  1. You erased from here link to an article you made an action in, by deleting wikification from "Freaky Friday".
  2. You deleted Facebook source without any good reason.

(Source: comare line # 789 in my revision and line # 800 in yours) --EraserHH (talk · contributions) 19:15, 24 February 2018 (UTC)


@EraserHH: Greetings to you. Your edit which I reverted, see here [7] where you removed a big amount of sourced text - see here [8] and also the page protect tag that were the reasons your edits have been reverted by me and other editors. Please do not removed sourced content and page protection tag. If want to edit the page, make sure it is cited with source and facebook is not a reliable source for verification. Please read reliable source here WP:RS, for verification - see here WP:V. Thank you. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 19:29, 24 February 2018 (UTC)


WP:RPP Double-flagging

How come you're flagging articles more than once for RPP? ([9], [10]) -- Veggies (talk) 19:35, 24 February 2018 (UTC)

@Veggies: Greetings. I guess I flagged the 1st time and went to do some other things in Wikpedia and forgot I hag flagged when I went back to Huggle and re-flagged ti. Apologies and thank you for letting me know. I saw the the double entry has been removed. Thank you. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 19:53, 24 February 2018 (UTC)

Missouri French - revert

I added a book to the article. You deleted it saying it had to have a source. This is puzzling. To state the title of a book... and its author and publication date...*is* to give a source. Really, this is an odd thing to do. I'm curious how exactly we cite the existence of a book. 67.60.108.191 (talk) 18:05, 24 February 2018 (UTC)

@67.60.108.191: Good afternoon and thank you for the question. You edit on Missouri French did not cite the source - see the history diff here [11] where you mainly stated "In 1982, Rosemary Hyde Thomas published a dual-language collection, "It's Good to Tell You: French Folktales from Missouri.". In Wikipedia, content added / edited need to support by independent reliable source for verification- see reliable source here for further detail WP:RS and for verification see here WP:V. To cite a web source (how to guile - which will come handy to you in due time) see here WP:CITEWEB and its template here Template:Cite web and to cite from a book, see here WP:HOWCITE and the template could be found here Template:Cite book.
NOTE: pls see example here - [12], history diff page for Glen_Tomasetti page below section - the first one is book citing and second is web citing for your reference.
=== Feminist activism ===
Many of Tomasetti's songs dealt with feminism and the situation of Australian women. Perhaps the best known is [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P_zb7OQogXw "Don't be too polite, girls"], a call for [[Equal pay for equal work|equal pay]] and a feminist call to arms. Sung to the tune of a classic 19th century Australian [[shearing]] ballad ("All among the wool, boys"), it was inspired by the first ruling on equal pay in Australia, a 1969 Commonwealth Conciliation and Arbitration ruling that granted equal pay to only 18% of Australian women.'''<ref>{{Cite book|url=https://www.worldcat.org/oclc/647833031|title=Making women count : a history of the Women's Electoral Lobby|last=Marian.|first=Sawer,|date=2008|publisher=UNSW Press|others=Radford, Gail.|year=|isbn=9780868409436|location=Sydney|pages=195|oclc=647833031}}</ref>''' The song was still being sung by the Melbourne Trade Union Choir at the time of Tomasetti's death in 2003.''<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.theage.com.au/articles/2003/06/30/1056825338016.html|title=Singer-writer Tomasetti dies, aged 74 - theage.com.au|website=www.theage.com.au|access-date=2018-02-24}}</ref>''


I have sent you a welcome message and there are many topic would help you on editing wikipedia. I strongly suggest you to look through Wikipedia:The Wikipedia Adventure for great introduction and exerice you might need. Happy editing and have a lovely night. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 18:24, 24 February 2018 (UTC)

List of Nintendo DS and 3DS flash cartridges - I'm new here

Here's the website I'm referring to, saying that dsiwarehax has been a thing https://3ds.hacks.guide/installing-boot9strap-(dsiware). I have no idea if it is relevant, but if it isn't, you can remove it off the page, if it hasn't been done already. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.213.244.162 (talk) 02:23, 25 February 2018 (UTC)

@71.213.244.162:, Greetings to you. Thank you for the URL and it has been place in the article. I have sent you a welcome message and there are topic would be of your interest in editing and contribution to Wikipedia. I suggest you take a look at WP:The Wikipedia Adventure and on citing source via web iste - see here WP:CITEWEB and its template - see here Template:Cite web. Thank you again for your contribution. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 09:52, 25 February 2018 (UTC)

Rosatom - More Vandalism

I have seen vandalism from two users 82.112.167.23 and 82.112.167.22, suspecting they both are the same person. They both keep changing the founder and key people to Mehsin Nseir or Vladimir Rurik, made-up names of people. Please give them the necessary consequences to prevent these users from vandalizing articles such as Rosatom ever again.

Josephua (talk) 03:09, 25 February 2018 (UTC)

@Josephua: Good afternoon and thank you for being this to my attention. I have send request to Wikipedia to check on if the two accounts are part of shock puppet. While it might take sometime being the finding is establish, at the mean time you might want to enable WP:Twinkle in your account to warn the vandalized editor yourself as you would notice such action much quicker than I do.
Below are some info on how to counter vandalism in Wikipedia
  1. Vandalism guidelines - Familiar yourself to the Wikipedia guidelines of what is vandalism and what is NOT and what is a good faith edit or test edit vs bluntly vandalism - see here WP:VAN - NOTE: Distruptive editing is no vandalism but editor is allow to warn the offender however, no more than 2 reverts in 24 hours window for that will violate the 3RR guidelines and get yourself in trouble - please see WP:3RR here.
  2. Warning message and level - In normal cases once the editor reach level 4 warning, see warning templates here WP:WARN, then we could report the editor to Administrator intervention against vandalism - see here WP:AIV. However, in certain serious and prolific vandalism we could give Only warning message without going through the level.
  3. Vandalism Tools - Download the tools for counter vandalism. There are a few tools, and one of them is Twinkle (TW)- see here WP:TW. Twinkle allow you to set warning level and type of warning. Note messages from TW is auto generated; however, you could use you own word if you find the auto message from TW is not sufficiently explain what you intended to convey to the editor.
Hope the above help and let me know if you need let me know. If you find yourself not comfortable to the counter vandalism task yourself, then let me know when the similiar incidents happen again and i will assist you.
Before I pen off, kindly provide me the source/reference (independent reliable source)of indication putin as the founder of Rosatom for I will put a hidden text on the page. Thank you. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 10:45, 25 February 2018 (UTC)

Boone County, Missouri - Unknown Edits

I've never heard of Boone County, MO & would not presume to write anything about it. I don't know why it happens but this is not the first time that edits were erroneously attributed to me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 107.77.210.12 (talk) 16:16, 25 February 2018 (UTC)

@107.77.210.12:, Greetings. Please see the link here, where you changed Boone County to bucanan County - [13]. Thank you. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 16:32, 25 February 2018 (UTC)

Boone County, Missouri - Untrue

No, you've got the wrong person. I did not do that edit. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 107.77.210.12 (talk) 20:54, 25 February 2018 (UTC)

@107.77.210.12: Wikipedia identify an editor by his/her IP address when the editor is not registered. You IP address pointed to AT&T mobile wireless ISP in United States. Do register as a user if you would like to avoid this problem. - See your contribution page and where the text below in the bottom at the page. This is your contribution page in Wikipeia - Special:Contributions/107.77.210.12
"This is the contributions page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address."
I also sent you a welcome message, where you could find the register info and other topics which might helpful to you. Thank you. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 06:37, 26 February 2018 (UTC)

Reference on Rosatom's founder.

Here is the reference that Rosatom was founded by Putin by signed law. Hope this helps.

[1]

This reference requires user authentification however and I was not able to get through. I used this source because it was the source used in the Russian-language version of the article. Sorry for the inconvenience. 

- Josephua (talk) 01:33, 26 February 2018 (UTC)

@Josephua:, Thank you for the link, however it is not a public site where viewer needs to register. It there any public web page would be obtained instead? CASSIOPEIA(talk) 06:40, 26 February 2018 (UTC)

Yes - Boone County, Missouri

I'm on a mobile hotspot where the IP changes often so others have access to that number, too. I checked the entries attributed to this IP & recognize only the edit I made today for Bronte. If you know people are on mobile hotspots, don't blame us! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 107.77.210.12 (talk) 08:30, 26 February 2018 (UTC)

@107.77.210.12:, Hello and good afternoon. It is not about blame, it is about identified by IP address. This is same as share IP for a college, school, library or etc where many ppl user the same ip address where Wikipedia could not know who use the IP on the edit or it is the same if even you are register and your little brother made a bad faith edit where he have you password or you were log on to Wiki but no using the computer but he did. Do encourage you to register and log on all the time that would avoid the issue. Thank you. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 08:39, 26 February 2018 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of UFC bonus award recipients, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ben Saunders (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 26 February 2018 (UTC)

Robin Bush (daughter of George H. W. Bush)

Hey Cassiopeia! I think I would like to delete my article, Robin Bush (daughter of George H. W. Bush). Can you show me how to do the speedy deletion for it?

-AprilShowersBringMayFlowers — Preceding unsigned comment added by AprilShowersBringMayFlowers (talk • contribs) 12:05, 26 February 2018 (UTC)

@AprilShowersBringMayFlowers:, Greetings. The article Robin Bush (daughter of George H. W. Bush) has been deleted. For any article that is created by you and you wold like to delete it you could place {{Db-g7}} on the top of the page before saving. Have a good day and happy editing. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 13:13, 26 February 2018 (UTC)

Fredrik Stark

Hi Cassiopeia,

My article about Fredrik Stark was tagged for deletion. I don't completely understand why my subject is not important enough to be on Wikipedia? He was the CEO of a company that was sold for millions to Neslté, that's surely something not everyone can say in their lifetime right?

Kind regards,

Jelle — Preceding unsigned comment added by JVR88 (talk • contribs) 14:26, 26 February 2018 (UTC)

@JVR88: Greetings. Since the page has been deleted, for such I could only go by your sandbox content - see here - User:JVR88/sandbox/Frederik Stark. You could resubmit again but you need to provide reliable independent source (not only primary source) in inline citation for verification. see reliable source here WP:RS and verification here WP:V for certain of subject meet the criteria of nobility. Let me know if you need further assistance. Thank you and have a good day . CASSIOPEIA(talk) 15:02, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
CASSIOPEIA is right, but just to add — you need to show notability, which for people needs to show significance for more than one event. Without reliable sources (see Cass' links) it's hard to prove that. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 15:56, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
Hello @CASSIOPEIA: and ::@Amorymeltzer:, would links to different pages like these help:
http://thefirstimpressioncompany.com/about-us.html
https://pitchbook.com/profiles/company/124502-95
https://www.linkedin.com/in/frstark
Thank you for the help, it is my first article I published, so far I have only played around in the sandbox. — Preceding unsigned comment added by JVR88 (talk • contribs) 15:10, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
@JVR88 and Amorymeltzer: Hi Amorymeltzer, Thanks for helping and providing addition information to JVR88. Appreciate it.
Hi JVR88, Content of the article is based on on reliable, third-party, published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy - see WP:SOURCE. The sources you provided are primary sources. Independent means third party source such source from major newspapers (Independent.co.uk and The Guardian) or book such as from Random House or Cambridge University Press. You could use source from any language as long as they are reliable and independent. I have sent you a welcome message, there are many topics would help you on how to edit and contribute to Wikipedia also I strongly suggest you to go through a fun and short reading and exercise on WP:Wikipedia Adventure. Hope this help and have a good night. 15:48, 27 February 2018 (UTC)

Your AIV report

You asked at AIV about the warnings for 184.147.111.85 (talk · contribs · WHOIS) and why I declined to block given there are 4 finals warnings on this user on February 2018 across multiple pages.. You personally gave nine warnings, but as far as I can see, a full seven of those were inappropriately given. On the 19th, the IP made several edits, then stopped; you gave your first warning 3.5 hours later, and then gave six more without any further edits from the IP. Those aren't warnings, they're just templating the user. A warning isn't a warning if we don't give them a chance to change. Similarly, you gave the user two warnings today 8.5 hours after their last edit. Additionally, it's an IP, so the fact that they haven't edited in 15 hours now makes blocking them largely pointless; blocks are preventative, not punitive. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 14:34, 26 February 2018 (UTC)

@Amorymeltzer: Greetings. I see you points but also see the multiple pages on vandalism just for February alone to constitute widespread and particularly egregious vandalism where more than 30 of the editor edits from 19 February.- see here Special:Contributions/184.147.111.85. Thank you. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 14:50, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
I saw, but again, blocks are to prevent harm to the encyclopedia, not punishment for past harm. Since they haven't been warned properly and they haven't edited in a full 17 hours now, there's no reason to give a short block. It's easy enough to warn 'em if they come back. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 15:59, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
CASSIOPEIA, I agree with Amorymeltzer about your warnings. Giving a string of "warnings" one after another without any intervening edits from the warned editor is disruptive and unconstructive. I have myself frequently declined what would otherwise have been valid AIV reports because the editor making the report has done things like that. I have never yet blocked an editor for such a string of inappropriate "warnings", as far as I remember, but I would do so if an editor continued to do that after being warned.
On the other hand, Amorymeltzer, I don't agree with you about the reported editor. If an IP address is the source of six vandalism edits in the course of 15 minutes and no other editing ever, then blocking the IP address 2 hours later would obviously be pointless, and it would be stupid to regard the editor as currently active. The same applies even more to a dynamic IP address which has been the source of hundreds of good edits over the course of several years, but where recently there has been a spurt of edits that are very similar to one another, evidently from the same person, but which bear no resemblance to earlier ones, so that there is no reason at all to think that the particular editor has ever edited from that IP address before. I say there is even more reason not to block than in the first case I mentioned, because there is now a risk that an innocent editor may suffer, which was very unlikely in the first case, where there had been no previous edits likely to be from other editors. However, the present case is very different from either of those scenarios. We have an IP address which has clearly been used by one person over the course of several weeks, and there had been no previous edits from this IP address for almost three years. An editor who has been editing regularly over several weeks cannot be reasonably regarded as not currently active because of a gap of hours in his or her editing, and I am puzzled as to why anyone would think that is any less so for an IP editor who has been the sole user of the IP address in question during the last three years than it would be for an editor with an account. Certainly a block should be used only if the problem is still current, but an intelligent approach regards "current" as being relative to the whole editing history: an editor who made a total of three edits in the course of ten minutes, finishing one hour ago, cannot reasonably be regarded as currently editing, but an editor who has made 500 edits over the course of two years, frequently with gaps of a week or two, cannot reasonably be regarded as not currently active just because there has been a gap of two days in his or her editing. The principle of not blocking an editor who is not currently active is obviously a good one, but what "currently active" means should be judged in proportion to the editor's history. I am not going to consider blocking the editor now, but that is only because I don't like blocking in response to a report from an editor who has posted inappropriate "warnings": otherwise I would. I shall also be willing to consider blocking this IP address if it is called to my attention that further disruptive editing resumes. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 16:05, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
JamesBWatson I don't disagree in the slightest about procedure, but I don't know where you get three years from. This is not a consistently active editor since 2015. There were a few edits in 2015, all of which were good-faith. Since then the address has been completely silent until four weeks ago. For all intents and purposes this is an editor who has received two, maybe three warnings over a four week period of editing. I'm happy to block should the IP return to its latest behavior, but this isn't a long-term abuser. I agree with you that the behavior this last month appears predictable, which is why I said above I'd block should it return, but as I'm not about to drop a 2-4 week block, the 15-17 hour delay makes a classic 31 or 48 hour block largely perfunctory, punitive, and pointless. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 16:23, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
@JamesBWatson and Amorymeltzer: Hi, from the discussion, I understand the reasons, and will report if the same actions occur from the reported editor in the future. Thanks again for assistance. Have a good night. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 16:57, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
OK, CASSIOPEIA. This discussion has become more about differences of opinion between me and Amorymeltzer than about your editing, so it shouldn't be continued on this page. I shall answer Amorymeltzer on his or her talk page rather than here. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 17:33, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
@JamesBWatson and Amorymeltzer:, Hi, would like to inform both of you that the reported user has just vandalized another page - see the hist diff here. [14]. Thank you. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 21:59, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
 Blocked ~ Amory (u • t • c) 22:05, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
@Amorymeltzer: Thank you. Appreciate it. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 22:29, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
  • CASSIOPEIA, I would have blocked for much longer than the 60 hours that Amorymeltzer has gone for. My experience suggests that when someone has been doing this kind of thing for weeks on end, blocking for a couple of days or so is futile. In fact I think it is likely to be counter productive, as the experience of having been blocked for a short time and having easily sat the block out encourages the person to think a block is not a big deal. However, we will see how it turns out. Please feel welcome to contact me about any further problem with this editor, if you wish to. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 08:41, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
@JamesBWatson: Hi, thank you for your response and would contact you should I need assistance. Have a good evening. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 09:05, 27 February 2018 (UTC)

Ranginui Walker

Hi thanks for letting me know that you’ve removed my note to Ann end my grandfathers wiki page. Ranginui Walker was my grandfather and I was with him the day that he died therefore I am the so RCS. The date of his death is currently listed incorrectly as 28th February 2016 but he in fact died on 29th February. I hope this helps. I’m sure I can find newspaper articles that confirm it or alternatively births deaths marriages NZ would be able to but I’m not very wiki edit savvy and not sure how to post those links from my cellphone, but I’m sure if you look you will find my date is in fact correct.

@MarciaWalker: Hi, Good day.  To add or edit content in Wikipedia inline citation from a reliable independent source is need for verification. See here reliable source WP:RS and verification - see here W:V. You could check out how to cite a source from web here WP:CITEWEB and its template Template: cite web. If you find the source - say a web source and you have problem to cite in the article, let me know and I will help you. Also, I have sent you a welcome message, there are many topics would be helpful to you on editing and contribution to Wikipedia. Have a good night.  CASSIOPEIA(talk) 15:20, 27 February 2018 (UTC)

Global Shapers - edits

Thanks for letting me know, apologies for that. Have tried again but this time with an edit summary. Please let me know if I should include more. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.209.79.87 (talk) 13:37, 27 February 2018 (UTC)

@194.209.79.87: Greetings. Please note that you have removed tags and content without a valid reason. Please do note the tag could only removed should the issues have been rectified and content added or edited needs to support by independent reliable source for verification. Pls see here reliable source -WP:RS, verification here - WP:V. Thank you. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 13:58, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
Hello Cassiopeia, have you received my message? I work for the Global Shapers Community had have been asked to update the page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.209.79.87 (talk) 16:31, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
Our problem is that our organization did not create this page and the information is outdated. can we not just include information from our website? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.209.79.87 (talk) 16:35, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
@194.209.79.87: Hi Good afternoon. Content in wikipedia should be based on independent reliable source for verification. If you work for Global Shaper and would like to edit or added the content in Wikipedia, you have (1) use independent source for citation for verification (such as reputatble newspaper publish about Global Shapers (not your own company source) 2. The content needs to write in a neutral point of view to avoid coflict of interest. Any content violate COI will be removed and if the article is created by such editor, the article would subject to deletion. The article at the moment is based on only the primary source which is Global Shapers and yet to be accessed for there is a discussion to be merge to another article named World Economic Forum.Do note content in Wikipedia is contribute by many editors and is it not solely own by any individual or operation. Anyone/editor could edit/add content as long as the content is based on independent reliable source (see here - WP:RS) for verification - see here WP:V. Thank you. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 16:59, 27 February 2018 (UTC)

Rosatom - Here is the new Reference

Here is the new reference.

[2] 

- Josephua (talk) 12:40, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
@Josephua: thank you Josephua. Hidden ref text has been place at the page. Have a good day. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 13:17, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
@Josephua:, Hi according to the finding there should be the same editor, however, there are not enough vandalised edit to block user yet, for such we have to wait if user committed further vandalized edit. I have marked the page under my watchlist and will be notified if new edit is made. However, I might be in different time zone that you and other editors, for such, I might know new edits made one day later. Have a good day. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 15:59, 28 February 2018 (UTC)

Bosniakization & Montenegrization

Can you please explain why you tagged these redirects as A3 speedy deletion? Prince of Thieves (talk) 23:15, 26 February 2018 (UTC)

@Prince of Thieves: Hi Good day and thank you for the question. Both of the articles have been deleted. They were tagged A3 as they have no content found on the articles. If you would like to recreate the articles again, please provide independent source for inline citation fro verification to establish the criteria for the nobility of the articles. See reliable source here WP:RS, verification here WP:v and notability here [WP:N]]. Thank you. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 06:14, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
But they weren't articles, they were redirects to wiktionary. Prince of Thieves (talk) 08:33, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
@Prince of Thieves:, no redirect were made. They were in the articles name space. No content without proper independent reliable source for verification of the subjects' notability would be accepted as article published. You are welcome them and resubmit provide the above requirements are met. Thank you CASSIOPEIA(talk) 08:59, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
All I did was use what I thought was a soft redirect template to wiktionary with {{wtr}}. Please advise. Prince of Thieves (talk) 13:26, 27 February 2018 (UTC)


@Prince of Thieves:, Hi, the articles have been deleted- pls see Montenegrization and Bosniakization. For search on these two articles would not be found anymore. You are welcome them and resubmit provide the above requirements are met as content without proper independent reliable source for verification of the subjects' notability would be accepted as article published. Thank you. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 13:32, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
@Prince of Thieves: Hello good afternoon, both of them have been redirect to Bosniaks and Montenegrins which I believe that were your intentions in the beginning. All is good now. Thank you and have lovely day. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 06:43, 28 February 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Yue Safy

A tag has been placed on Yue Safy requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from the article namespace to a different namespace except the Category, Template, Wikipedia, Help, or Portal namespaces.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — JJMC89 (T·C) 02:59, 28 February 2018 (UTC)

@JJMC89: Hi Good day. I did not create the article but the creation is done by user Iphone5Sgold. I am the one who moved the article to the draft space to advise creator to provide reliable, independent inline citation and you deleted the article under R2. I am not sure you sent this message to the right person or I have mistaken something here. Kindly advise. Thank you. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 06:06, 28 February 2018 (UTC)
Hi CASSIOPEIA. It was intended for you. Since you moved the article you were the creator of the redirect left in its place, which is what I requested be deleted per R2. The draft is still where you moved it. — JJMC89 (T·C) 06:11, 28 February 2018 (UTC)
@JJMC89: Hi Thank you for the quick response. The page has been deleted by you - see here Yue Safy and the draft copy see here Draft:Yue Safy still in draft space and the creator is Iphone5Sgold. Did you mean that if I move the article to draft space the "moved article" creator would be me? I am a little confuse here, kindly explain and advise. Secondly, I have no objection the article to be CSDed. Thirdly, would this mean the article is deleted in the main space and the draft copy would remain for creator to work on the requests or expansion of the article? Thank you. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 06:20, 28 February 2018 (UTC)
You moved Yue Safy (originally created by Iphone5Sgold) to Draft:Yue Safy (still created by Iphone5Sgold). This left a redirect (pointing to the draft) at Yue Safy (created by you, as the mover). I requested that the redirect be deleted. Malcolmxl5 deleted the redirect in mainspace. The draft still remains. — JJMC89 (T·C) 06:28, 28 February 2018 (UTC)
@JJMC89: Hi JJMC89, Thank you for the confirmation/explanation. Last question, my motivation for the move was to advise creator to provide reliable and independent citation prior resubmit and believe this is the appropriate of the move to draft. Do advise this is not and if so, kindly suggestion after mean. Thank you. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 06:39, 28 February 2018 (UTC)
While the one reference does verify some of the content, it doesn't support everything, so there are WP:BLP issues. Football isn't my thing, so I can't say if Safy is notable. WP:NFOOTY is the notability guideline. You may want to post at WT:FOOTY to get someone familiar with footballers to take a look. If notable, bring the article into compliance with BLP: add sources or trim. If not notable sent it to Afd (instead of draftifying). Draftfying is an option if notable and you think the author will then bring them up to par. WP:FOOTY could advise you better on this topic than I. — JJMC89 (T·C) 07:09, 28 February 2018 (UTC)
@JJMC89: I share the same view. It is the third party source I am after as per WP:SOURCES. For any major league players in any sports to source for a third party reference is not hard especially in their homeland newspaper. What the creator provided is a depository/normal routine sport coverage (it serve some reference but not everything). Thank you for taking the time to respond to me. Appreciate it and have a wonderful night. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 07:32, 28 February 2018 (UTC)

Mark Easton

Hi, a week ago you helpfully reverted an edit [15] by a COI editor which removed content from the Mark Easton article without explanation. Unfortunately, that hasn't fixed the situation and an editor claiming to be Easton continues on making the same removal. I've given a reminder about COI policies and urged the editor to use the talk page to discuss the matter, but none of this has had an impact. I note the IP your reverted is owned by the BBC so it's likely to be the subject who is doing this. I expect the section could be tweaked sightly in order to improve it, but it's well sourced and clearly of note (particularly the first paragraph) so deletion is obviously wrong. If you get chance I'd appreciate your input and perhaps you'd have more luck in getting the editor to discuss things on the talk page. I'll start a discussion there shortly.--Shakehandsman (talk) 04:16, 28 February 2018 (UTC)

@Shakehandsman: Hi good afternoon. I have run through the article and history log/diff and understand your concern of COI and removing of source contain. However, to say that three of the sources are from Telegraph with two on "view" section instead of "new" section athought one of them is supported UK parliament transcript. My take is to make sure user Mark Easton be advised to have a dialog in article talk page where you need to inform him on article talk page and his talk page on the discussion, and at the mean time to avoid committing 3RR or edit warring on your part which are clearly not. My concern is that Mark Easton might consider a minor public person which I am not sure if he is subject to WP:PUBLICFIGURE guidelines and it seems the supported sources are from Telegraph Uk and Mark Easton works for BBC. My view is as long as reliable independent source and neutrality are adhered for any articles' content input. However, since the 2 points I stated above (minor public person and two news publications), should the user Mark Easton continues refusing to have dialogue (we cann't force anyone to talk if they choose not to) you might want to bring this to Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard - WP:BLPN for multiple admin would able to provide better opinions/solutions; however, if a second or third source would be found to support the claim besides Telegraphy.uk would be better. Thank you. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 15:29, 28 February 2018 (UTC)

Article moves

Please stop moving unreferenced stub articles to draft-space. I appreciate the motivation, but it is not the best way to treat these pages; the chance of their creator coming back to improve them is trivial, and leaving them to be deleted as CSD G13 in six months is pointless. If a reference is not needed - and of course it normally is - then add a {{stub}} tag. Otherwise mark them for deletion, either by CSD or by AfD as the text suggests.--Anthony Bradbury"talk" 17:31, 1 March 2018 (UTC)

@Anthony Bradbury:, Hi thank you for the advice. Almost all of the articles moved draft have no source at all and most of them are created by new editors, and I think they should at least be informed and try to provide a source to understand one of the the Wikipedia core policies on citing source instead just writing up something and think that is all it needs for that is how is how Wikipedia works. I send message to each to the editors and informed them about the issues and provide all links necessary for them to understand how things work in Wikipedia. Thank you. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 17:44, 1 March 2018 (UTC)

Cross-namespace redirects

When moving articles into draftspace (as you seem to be doing very frequently), make sure to nominate the resulting redirect for deletion per R2. Nikkimaria (talk) 12:40, 1 March 2018 (UTC)

@Nikkimaria: Hi, Thank you for the info. Could you pls advised me where to find the redirect pages for me to place R2 deletion as all my previous pages which I moved to drafspace were done by other editor? Thanks in advance for the assistance. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 12:57, 1 March 2018 (UTC)
For example, you moved 2018–19 NBA season to Draft:2018–19 NBA season, but notice that the first of those links is still blue? That's because when you move a page, the original title is not deleted, but automatically replaced with a redirect to the new title. When you're moving across namespaces, you should return to the original title (in this case 2018–19 NBA season) to place a {{db-r2}} tag. (If you click on the old title and get the new one, it should say "Redirected from..." near the top of the page - click that to get back to the old one). It would also be good to remove categories, check for non-free files, etc when moving, as those things should only be used in articlespace. Nikkimaria (talk) 13:03, 1 March 2018 (UTC)
@Nikkimaria:Thanks for the advice and instruction. I have done the below and kindly advise if I have done them right
  1. I have placed {{db-r2}} on 2018–19 NBA season page
  2. I have place ":" in front of the category on Draft:2018–19 NBA season and there is no file to check against in Wikicommon.
Pls let me know an thank you. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 13:28, 1 March 2018 (UTC)
Looks good, thanks. You may want to check out the scripts at WP:DRAFTIFY if you haven't already. Nikkimaria (talk) 23:13, 1 March 2018 (UTC)
@Nikkimaria: Thank you for checking; appreciate it. Will check out WP:DRAFTIFY and thank you for the info. Have a good day. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 07:51, 2 March 2018 (UTC)

Help Needed

Moved from User:CASSIOPEIA
 – This message was [16] and user has move it here

Please help me out, I'm new to this talk process.

How do I send a message to you like you did to me about Blinca Blonco?

Mikemaxson

@Mikemaxson: Greetings to you. To message an editor do the below
  1. on your talk page - you need to ping the editor so he/she would be notified that is message from you to him/her. Place {{ping|the editor username}}. For example if you ping me on your talk page it would be looked like this {{ping|CASSIOPEIA}}
  2. on the editor talk page - just click new section (you could find the it at the vert top of the page and place the subject name (above the line) and below the line you just type your message. Since it is the editor talk page, Wikipedia will automatically notify the editor that he/she has a message.
  1. Pls note that you have sent the message to me on my User Page instead of my talk page. I have already move the message here now.
  2. Lastly, Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date.
Hope the above help. Have a good night. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 13:59, 1 March 2018 (UTC)
@CASSIOPEIA: Thank you

New weight classes in UFC 2019

Do you think Dana white will add new weight classes in 2019? Sameem123 (talk) 07:05, 2 March 2018 (UTC)

@Sameem123:, Well, Even with all the news and podcasts I follow, I would not know, but personally, I would like to see 170 Ibs to be dropped and introduce 165 Ibs, 175 Ibs and 225 Ibs divisions and hopefully women's atom weight 105 Ibs and WLW 155 Ibs in the future. Dana once said there will be no women division in UFC and now there are 4, so time will tell. The chances are if the market demands it then UFC would sell the divisions as long as they can make money. I want to see fighters compensate well financially, USDADA and cage rules applied strictly for fighters' heath and well-being. If big money could be made like other professional sports (NBA, NFL, major SOCCER leagues), we would we see bigger guys ( 205 to 265 ibs) just appear in MMA scene. Have a good day. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 07:29, 2 March 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Fu Jen Catholic University Hospital - Fu Jen Catholic University Hospital

done.EssayH (talk) 09:13, 2 March 2018 (UTC)

@EssayH: Greetings to you. You have insert 3 citations with "primary source" but not independent/ third party source - see WP:SOURCES. I have input 3 independent source on the page - see ref 1,2 and 3 for you. For inline citation, you need to input all the info needed instead just past the URL. You could click the cite bottom and fill in the neccessary information as requeired. The page has been reviewed and moved to article page - see here Fu Jen Catholic University Hospital . Thank you for your contribution to Wikipedia. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 09:54, 2 March 2018 (UTC)

UFC weight classes

I just wish UFC added more weight classes and there's enough talent to make all 4 new weight classes I do agree with you that they should get rid of 170 and add 175 instead you can't have to 170s weight classes that's just stupid Conor McGregor said that he wants UFC to create 165 pound weight class in UFC according to his manager that's only when he returns to UFC but for right the future is ahead of us and we live in the present I just can't wait when they make weight classes it makes me feel excited and happy. Sameem123 (talk) 11:49, 2 March 2018 (UTC)

Women's lightweight

I'm not really fan of women competing at higher weight classes like men because women are a lot smaller than men. Plus Dana White gave women featherweight division so let me count how many divisions are there for women there's like 5 weight classes for them so to me that's enough. Sameem123 (talk) 11:52, 2 March 2018 (UTC)

  1. ^ http://i.rbc.ru/organization/item/rosatom
  2. ^ http://www.world-nuclear-news.org/newsarticle.aspx?id=14490
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Cassiopeia/Archive_3&oldid=1212126278"