User talk:Canaryman123$

This is Canaryman123$'s talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Kirna (November 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The building article does not have independent notability to the designer. Need more sources to show it is notable.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Kirna and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:The Kirna, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 18:43, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Canaryman123$! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 18:43, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Kirna has been accepted

The Kirna, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Legacypac (talk) 05:52, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ballantyne family

Hello. Do you think we would benefit from an article on the Ballantyne wool family? Although Ballantyne is tagged as a surname list, the extensive list of places and other meanings mean that it should really be a disambiguation page. Almost all of the entries have the required blue links except for the wool people and their company. Would it make sense to assemble the information from there, The Kirna, Walkerburn and any other relevant articles in one place? We could then create redirects from the unlinked people. Many of the pages which link to Ballantyne refer to the family rather than the surname in general, and those links could also be diverted to the new article. I'm not sure of the best title because there are other Ballantyne families. Normally I'd put this sort of request on a WikiProject page, but we seem to have a clear subject expert in this case. Although I have plenty of edits and am happy to help with wikifying, I'm not really an article creator and don't know the topic. Certes (talk) 10:39, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The Kirna

In response to your request for assessment at Wikiproject Scotland, I have looked at the article and agree it meets B Class, which is its current assigned Class. Overall, a fascinating read on a a Category A piece of Scottish history, so well done. I think with some general copyediting, you would be close to meeting GA Class if you are working towards it (for more details see Wikipedia:Good articles). My suggestions for improvement would be to look closely at the image selection as it is perhaps a little cluttered, consider a slight restructure (see templates at Wikipedia:WikiProject_Architecture#Help_for_authors for more detail) and importantly closely look at the content to ensure that it does not read as original research (which in most cases it does not as there are good references). Overall though, a fascinating architectural read. Coldupnorth (talk) 19:38, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]