User talk:Calliopejen~enwiki

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Survivorbuff.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Survivorbuff.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:28, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Images

I'm not sure why the images would not be either Free or GFDL. The vast majority of Buddhist material (books and such) usually have notes on them saying that people can and are encouraged to spread the content around freely. These materials are an example of this. They can be found in any Vietnamese Buddhist temple. Can you explain this? Thanks, Blnguyen (bananabucket) 08:59, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Skinnyjeans.jpg

You have a link to a Flickr page for this, but "this photo has been deleted". We therefore need some proof of the photo's original licensing, or it may have to be deleted. 81.158.1.156 (talk) 20:32, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use Image:Audrey.jpg

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Audrey.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Bkell (talk) 17:13, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Commes_des_garcons_-_2001.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Commes_des_garcons_-_2001.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 22:01, 3 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Image:Viktor and rolf.jpg

A tag has been placed on Image:Viktor and rolf.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:Image:Viktor and rolf.jpg|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Polly (Parrot) 00:05, 2 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:Sisterr.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Sisterr.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 04:27, 1 July 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Bkell (talk) 04:27, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Skinnyjeans.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Skinnyjeans.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 05:01, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Cambodia

You and Mangstar aren't the same editor are you?? I saw your note that you had more sources for Cambodia. If so, I'll probably be starting on Cambodia in a few months, so let me know when the time comes. Dr. Blofeld (talk) 12:50, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination of Category:Fashion muses

I have nominated Category:Fashion muses (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Mbinebri ^{talk ←} 17:16, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Ángel arcabucero

On April 28, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Ángel arcabucero, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Shubinator (talk) 04:33, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:USgovtPOV

If you could make a clone of this as Template:IsraeligovtPOV it would be exactly what I am looking for right now. -- 209.6.238.201 (talk) 00:35, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

NowCommons: File:Uccello mazzocchio2.jpg

File:Uccello mazzocchio2.jpg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:Uccello mazzocchio2.jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[File:Uccello mazzocchio2.jpg]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 11:46, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Elisha cuthbert.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Elisha cuthbert.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. IngerAlHaosului (talk) 14:27, 25 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Rochas.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Rochas.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 15:06, 19 March 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. IngerAlHaosului (talk) 15:06, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Rochas.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Rochas.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. IngerAlHaosului (talk) 15:06, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Lithuanian artists

Hi. Can you help save a few of the articles in Wikipedia:WikiProject Visual arts/Unreferenced BLPs. Most of them could be saved with a sentence or two and a reliable ref. I know its not something I really feel like doing either but if we expand a few every few days spending a couple of minutes on them, together we could whittle down the list. If they are worth keeping that is.. Dr. Blofeld ^{White cat} 11:38, 12 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Could you help find the coordinates to Messina Palace? Dr. Blofeld ^{White cat} 21:57, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Picture candidates

Previously you voted at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Barack & Michelle Obama. I have nominated it at WP:VPC as well as several other Chicago related candidates that could use some feedback. Please stop by and help us make some decisions.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 22:51, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Identity

Hi Jen. PLease can you remove the redirect from my name to Dr. Blofeld in the commons here asap. My original account contains some local photos which I don't want connected to my Dr. Blofeld account and I want to protect my identity. PLease just blank the page.♦ Dr. Blofeld 11:16, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Binky.GIF

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Binky.GIF. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:32, 14 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Chanelfall1991.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Chanelfall1991.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 01:06, 5 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Hilya

On 8 November 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Hilya, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that a hilya (example pictured) in Islamic calligraphy contains a description of the prophet Muhammad? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Hilya.You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

The DYK project (nominate) 00:02, 8 November 2011 (UTC)

Zevia

You're more familiar with the copyright rules than me. I've never been clear of the copyright status of a photograph someone takes of a company product. Would you have a look at the gallery in Zevia? They were uploaded in good faith, the photographer has a public domain statement, but am not sure about whether they need some sort of fair use rationale. (Also I think that gallery is overkill but that's another issue.) ~Amatulić (talk) 16:55, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Lesmoking.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Lesmoking.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:10, 9 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Women's Wear Daily (front page - July 26, 2006).jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Women's Wear Daily (front page - July 26, 2006).jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:49, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for What Wondrous Love Is This

On 10 May 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article What Wondrous Love Is This, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the melody of the hymn "What Wondrous Love Is This" is generally believed to have been borrowed from a ballad about pirate William Kidd? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/What Wondrous Love Is This. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

The DYK project (nominate) 16:04, 10 May 2013 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Asticinzano.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Asticinzano.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:29, 3 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your account will be renamed

Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Calliopejen. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Calliopejen~enwiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name. If you think you might own all of the accounts with this name and this message is in error, please visit Special:MergeAccount to check and attach all of your accounts to prevent them from being renamed.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours,
Keegan Peterzell
Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation

22:51, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed

This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: Special:GlobalRenameRequest. -- Keegan (WMF) (talk)

11:21, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of 19th century in fashion

The article 19th century in fashion has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Page contains no content apart from links to other Wikipedia articles and does not follow style set for other history of fashion articles (there is no 18th or 20th century in fashion article) as fashion history is generally covered by decade or era. Also duplicates links provided by History of Western fashion.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Libby norman (talk) 09:12, 5 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Calliopejen, sorry about the rather formal automated message above, but I have proposed deletion of this article because it seems rather superfluous and there is another article, History of Western fashion, that seems to provide the same links. The only alternative I can think of is to expand the 19th century article and give an overview...but 100 years in one article when it would be duplicating other material sounds a bit of a stretch to me! Would welcome your thoughts on its talk page or mine. Libby norman (talk) 17:45, 5 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Rochas.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Rochas.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:58, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 October 1 § Category:WikiProject X members

A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 October 1 § Category:WikiProject X members on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Qwerfjkl talk 09:32, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]