User talk:CWH/Archive 5
This is an archive of past discussions with User:CWH. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | ← | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 |
Speedy deletion nomination of User:CWH/Sha Fei
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on User:CWH/Sha Fei, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
- It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
- It appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free Web hosting service. (See section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion.)
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. TJH2018 talk 16:11, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
- @TJH2018: That's a ridiculous deletion request. CWH has created dozens of well developed articles from his userspace. I've removed the speedy tag. -Zanhe (talk) 16:43, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
- Hi CWH, thanks for your timely creation of the article. I've nominated it for DYK, see here. It'd be cool if it could run during the Harvard conference on him. I've also uploaded dozens of his photos to the Commons, see Commons category. There are hundreds of nice photos available. I'll upload more when I have more time. Cheers, -Zanhe (talk) 05:32, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
- Good to have your help once again, Zanhe. I put the article up rather speedily precisely because of the Harvard conference and exhibition, so I did not have time to do more and your input is more than ordinarily crucial! The photos you added are fantastic.
- I was taken aback at the well-intentioned but ungrounded speedy deletion tag. The justification for the tag had no connection to the article (and it was added within an hour of my creating the userspace draft). I also need to thank Neonorange for putting in a sensible word in support of the article.ch (talk) 16:53, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
Hi CWH, thanks for creating yet another much needed article! I have a question about his early years though: I couldn't find in Newmeyer or other sources anything about his being a silver assayer during the Yaqui Wars. Are you sure that's correct? Thanks, Zanhe (talk) 04:40, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
- Sorry -- the info was in the Arlington Cemetery cite, which I fixed.ch (talk) 05:10, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks for getting it sorted out. I checked the Arlington Cemetery article, but they misspelled "Yaqui", so my search for the word didn't come up with anything. -Zanhe (talk) 05:58, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
- I've copyedited the article and nominated it for DYK, please see here. Thanks again! -Zanhe (talk) 07:13, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks for getting it sorted out. I checked the Arlington Cemetery article, but they misspelled "Yaqui", so my search for the word didn't come up with anything. -Zanhe (talk) 05:58, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
- Sorry -- the info was in the Arlington Cemetery cite, which I fixed.ch (talk) 05:10, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
DYK for Sha Fei
On 22 April 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Sha Fei, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Harvard University is holding a conference today on Sha Fei, "The Photographer Who Shaped Modern China" (sample photograph pictured)? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Sha Fei. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Sha Fei), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
WormTT(talk) 22:56, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
Just thought I'd mentioned that I found the article through DYK and really enjoyed it! Cheers! --Falcorian (talk) 00:23, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks, Falcorian. The article could not have made DYK without the hard work and good eye of Zanhech (talk) 04:57, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
DYK for Carl Whiting Bishop
On 25 April 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Carl Whiting Bishop, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Tokyo-born archeologist Carl Whiting Bishop served in U.S. naval intelligence during World War I? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Carl Whiting Bishop. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Carl Whiting Bishop), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 21:52, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Small Memorial Stele China.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Small Memorial Stele China.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 14:14, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
File:Tank Commander Nishizumi Film Poster.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Tank Commander Nishizumi Film Poster.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:33, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
DYK for David Tod Roy
On 19 June 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article David Tod Roy, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that David Tod Roy, the son of Presbyterian missionaries to China, produced the first unexpurgated English translation of the Ming dynasty erotic novel Jin Ping Mei? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/David Tod Roy. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, David Tod Roy), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Maile (talk) 00:02, 19 June 2016 (UTC)
Please see note on your DYK review. Also, if you have any questions about DYK, I'd be happy to answer them on my talk page. Best, Yoninah (talk) 23:59, 20 June 2016 (UTC)
DYK prose size counting
Hello! You may try the tool mentioned here to check prose size adequacy and such things. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 09:24, 20 June 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks, Dharmadhyaksha! I finally figured out that I could go to the history page for the article in question and use the DYK checker on the earlier version, though it's still not clear which version. ch (talk) 17:16, 20 June 2016 (UTC)
- If you are using Shubinator's DYK tool, the link of which I mentioned above, it tell you from when the expansion started. You then have to only check if that date fits in the 7 days period before which nomination should be submitted. In case you are really confused about any nomination, you can take it to DYK's talk page case by case and someone will guide you. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:25, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks again -- I did use Shubinator's tool, but indeed was not clear about what date to use it on. Sorry to put you through all this bother for such an interesting hook and exemplary article.ch (talk) 15:07, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
- If you are using Shubinator's DYK tool, the link of which I mentioned above, it tell you from when the expansion started. You then have to only check if that date fits in the 7 days period before which nomination should be submitted. In case you are really confused about any nomination, you can take it to DYK's talk page case by case and someone will guide you. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:25, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks, Dharmadhyaksha! I finally figured out that I could go to the history page for the article in question and use the DYK checker on the earlier version, though it's still not clear which version. ch (talk) 17:16, 20 June 2016 (UTC)
June 2016
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Aircraft, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. BilCat (talk) 22:52, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
- Apologies, BilCat, I made my reversion of that nonsense without seeing that you had beaten me to it (the same editor had made a number of similar edits and I went from that editor's Contributions page and carelessly did not check).ch (talk) 01:53, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
- Ok, no problem, I've made that kind of mistake myself. - BilCat (talk) 01:57, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks!ch (talk) 02:05, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
- Ok, no problem, I've made that kind of mistake myself. - BilCat (talk) 01:57, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
Longhairs
You're welcome! Although, if you're watching them, both articles still need a lot more work, not least to differentiate them between the military actions (rebellion) and the state (kingdom). It also currently omits or quickly skips past rather major parts of the event, like how it bounced from Guangdong to 'xi to the Yangtze. Tian Wang could also use a section mentioning its use under the Taipings.
Day day up up... — LlywelynII 04:22, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
- I especially wanted to thank you because it was my edit that you correctly called "overly verbose and pedantic" -- I must have been suffering from sleep deprivation when I made it!
- As to the TP articles, you are so right that they need work, as do many China articles. It's more exciting to start a new article than drudge through one that looks OK. I include myself among the guilty! But if you start fixing up those articles, I would probably feel shamed or inspired by your Lei Feng-ish example and follow suit Just maybe say on the Talk Page whether you have such plans and I won't step on your toes (as I did recently and got tangled up in cross-editing).ch (talk) 20:12, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
DYK nomination of Scarlet Memorial: Tales of Cannibalism in Modern China
Hello! Your submission of Scarlet Memorial: Tales of Cannibalism in Modern China at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! --DYKReviewBot (report bugs) 03:27, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
Hi, I came across this nomination while building prep sets. I found it very hard to follow what was going on because you didn't sign any of your posts, and things weren't in chronological order. Next time, please sign each post and put it after the previous one, like the page creator did, so we can follow it. Thanks! Yoninah (talk) 21:51, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
DYK for Scarlet Memorial: Tales of Cannibalism in Modern China
On 17 September 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Scarlet Memorial: Tales of Cannibalism in Modern China, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the 1993 book Scarlet Memorial: Tales of Cannibalism in Modern China alleges that victors in a factional battle ate the flesh of losers in Guangxi during China's Cultural Revolution? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Scarlet Memorial: Tales of Cannibalism in Modern China. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Scarlet Memorial: Tales of Cannibalism in Modern China), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:03, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
Hello, CWH. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
December 2016
Hello, I'm Zackmann08. Thank you for your recent contributions to Zou Taofen. I noticed that when you added the image to the infobox, you added it as a thumbnail. In the future, please do not use thumbnails when adding images to an infobox (see WP:INFOBOXIMAGE). What does this mean? Well in the infobox, when you specify the image you wish to use, instead of doing it like this:
|image=[[File:SomeImage.jpg|thumb|Some image caption]]
Instead just supply the name of the image. So in this case you can simply do:
|image=SomeImage.jpg
.
There will then be a separate parameter for the image caption such as |caption=Some image caption
. Please note that this is a generic form message I am leaving on your page because you recently added a thumbnail to an infobox. The specific parameters for the image and caption may be different for the infobox you are using! Please consult the Template page for the infobox being used to see better documentation. Thanks! Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 07:46, 15 December 2016 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Hoppo (product of undiscussed move)
A tag has been placed on Hoppo (product of undiscussed move) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from the article namespace to a different namespace except the Category, Template, Wikipedia, Help, or Portal namespaces.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Steel1943 (talk) 21:08, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Hoppo
Hi, In ictu oculi;
I think we worked together a while ago on Bible translations into Chinese.
In any case, thanks for taking an interest in this article, and for taking the initiative in editing Hu Bu. However, as I explained on the TalkPage there, Hu Bu is the Ministry of Finance, not the Hoppo. It is true that one good theory for the name Hoppo is that foreigners were confused by the fact that he collected revenue and thought that he worked for the Ministry, but that was their mistake. In looking over a good deal of material on the subject, I can't recall ever seeing the Ministry referred to as "Hoppo" and a Google search doesn't turn one up. I took the liberty of taking out that phrase from the Hu Bu article and taking Hu Bu off the Hoppo (disambiguation) page.
I apologize for causing such confusion!ch (talk) 05:15, 25 December 2016 (UTC)
- Please look at these sources Merry Christmas! In ictu oculi (talk) 08:32, 25 December 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks again for following up on this and an even Merrier Christmas right back at you!-- and thanks for the (slightly unusual) move of the discussion from your TalkPage to mine.
- But these sources seem to back up the point that the person "Hoppo" was not the same as the Ministry of Finance. For instance, the very first of these references says 戶部」本是中國政府管理財政的一個郡,但在當地,大家就誤稱粵海關監督為「戶部」, which I translate as "Hubu is a Chinese government agency.... but everybody mistakenly calls the Canton Maritime Customs Official 'Hubu..."
- So maybe we should add something to the lede to clarify that the term "Hoppo" is actually pidgen English, not Chinese, and maybe take out the Chinese translation 戶部. ch (talk) 03:15, 26 December 2016 (UTC)
Again, let's move this discussion to the TalkPage at Hoppo (Qing dynasty official).ch (talk) 04:27, 26 December 2016 (UTC)
Hoppo
Hi -- to get the page Hoppo deleted so you can move your userspace page there, you should add an entry at WP:RM when you're ready to move it and an administrator will take care of moving the page for you. CapitalSasha ~ talk 16:56, 22 December 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks, CapitalSasha, and apologies for messing things up so much, but when I tried that, it told me that this would not work for a move from a UserSpace article, so I moved it to ArticleSpace as "Hoppo (Qing dynasty official)", and then asked for a move to "Hoppo."ch (talk) 03:19, 26 December 2016 (UTC)
- Oops, sorry for the bad advice. Looks like you've got things sorted out now, thanks! CapitalSasha ~ talk 07:33, 26 December 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks, CapitalSasha, and apologies for messing things up so much, but when I tried that, it told me that this would not work for a move from a UserSpace article, so I moved it to ArticleSpace as "Hoppo (Qing dynasty official)", and then asked for a move to "Hoppo."ch (talk) 03:19, 26 December 2016 (UTC)
Boxer Rebellion
Hi CWH. The text that you restored here had been changed by an editor who also made this edit. You might be better informed to judge if this too should be restored. Thanks, Rui ''Gabriel'' Correia (talk) 09:04, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
Discussion on Film censorship in China
Hello! You've listed yourself as a member of Wikipedia:WikiProject Film/Chinese cinema task force. There is currently a discussion that may be of interest to you at Film censorship in China about changes to the table on the article, what information should be listed in the table, and general criteria for a film's inclusion. Please see Talk:Film censorship in China#Changes. If it is also of interest, there is also a discussion at the same article about adding scholarly literature and further historical information to the article. ~Cheers, TenTonParasol 03:38, 14 June 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks for the heads up, TenTonParasol!ch (talk) 15:36, 14 June 2017 (UTC)
Expert on China.
If I ever need an expert on China, I hope I could consult you. My Chinese wife is from Malaysia, and speaks Mandarin and Cantonese, as well as British English and Malay, and now she studying Spanish!--Dthomsen8 (talk) 14:35, 16 June 2017 (UTC)
- I'd be glad to help if I can, but I can't claim to be an "expert", though, only a "specialist".
- At this point Wikipedia's China related articles are more in need of intelligent editorial curating than deep expertise in any case. We probably need more re-writing, pruning, and re-ordering than new articles -- but that's a question for another day and another forum.ch (talk) 18:14, 17 June 2017 (UTC)
Ways to improve Thomas Arthur Bisson
Hi, I'm Scope creep. CWH, thanks for creating Thomas Arthur Bisson!
I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Excellent work, need a image. Several seem to be available, pre 1956, PD.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.
scope_creep (talk) 11:39, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
- Many thanks for the quick and useful review Scope creep! I responded briefly to your suggestions on the article's Talk Page for the reference of future editors.ch (talk) 16:39, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
Replaceable fair use File:Niu Weiyu with camera early 1950s.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Niu Weiyu with camera early 1950s.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:
- Go to the file description page and add the text
{{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}}
below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing<your reason>
with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable. - On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.
Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 04:14, 28 August 2017 (UTC)
2017 Military history WikiProject Coordinator election
Greetings from the Military history WikiProject! Elections for the Military history WikiProject Coordinators are currently underway. As a member of the WikiProject you are cordially invited to take part by casting your vote(s) for the candidates on the election page. This year's election will conclude at 23:59 UTC 29 September. Thank you for your time. For the current tranche of Coordinators, AustralianRupert (talk) 10:39, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
File copyright problem with File:Mulian Saves His Mother Drawing.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Mulian Saves His Mother Drawing.jpg. However, it is currently missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.
Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation.
ATTENTION: This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 03:00, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Zheng Guanying
Started Zheng Guanying for Asian month! It had articles in various languages but not English... WhisperToMe (talk) 09:44, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
- Great to hear that you are working on this @WhisperToMe: -- thanks for letting me know. I'll keep an eye on the article and raise the assessment when you've finished what you are going to do for now. I especially like the Gloria Davis article, which has rich material for your section on his legacy and influence.ch (talk) 19:48, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
Hello, CWH. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
2017 Military Historian of the Year and Newcomer of the Year nominations and voting
As we approach the end of the year, the Military History project is looking to recognise editors who have made a real difference. Each year we do this by bestowing two awards: the Military Historian of the Year and the Military History Newcomer of the Year. The co-ordinators invite all project members to get involved by nominating any editor they feel merits recognition for their contributions to the project. Nominations for both awards are open between 00:01 on 2 December 2017 and 23:59 on 15 December 2017. After this, a 14-day voting period will follow commencing at 00:01 on 16 December 2017. Nominations and voting will take place on the main project talkpage: here and here. Thank you for your time. For the co-ordinators, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:35, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
I would like to know whether you wanted to move this page to Li Huang which is where I would have expected it to be, rather than deleting the page altogether. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 06:04, 12 December 2017 (UTC)
- Yes please, you are right! I couldn't move it there because an article with that name had been deleted. Many thanks for your help and your patience. ch (talk) 06:06, 12 December 2017 (UTC)
- Apologies, Metropolitan90 I messed up thoroughly, and another administrator deleted the page. I'm not sure if it can be de-deleted, and it doesn't seem to be possible for me to create another with the same name. I saved the text, however. Is it possible for an administrator to unprotect "Li Huang"? (I don't see the point of protecting it in the first place, but that's neither here nor there). Cheers and thanks in any case.ch (talk) 19:14, 12 December 2017 (UTC)
- Hi CWH, it appears that Anthony Appleyard acted on your request and deleted the page. I'm sure he can restore the article and move it to Li Huang. You can also make a request at WP:REFUND. -Zanhe (talk) 19:39, 12 December 2017 (UTC)
- Apologies, Metropolitan90 I messed up thoroughly, and another administrator deleted the page. I'm not sure if it can be de-deleted, and it doesn't seem to be possible for me to create another with the same name. I saved the text, however. Is it possible for an administrator to unprotect "Li Huang"? (I don't see the point of protecting it in the first place, but that's neither here nor there). Cheers and thanks in any case.ch (talk) 19:14, 12 December 2017 (UTC)
- Yes please, you are right! I couldn't move it there because an article with that name had been deleted. Many thanks for your help and your patience. ch (talk) 06:06, 12 December 2017 (UTC)
- @Metropolitan90, CWH, and Zanhe: I have undeleted it, at Li Huang, and AfD'ed it at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Li Huang. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 23:10, 12 December 2017 (UTC)
- @Anthony Appleyard: thanks for restoring the article! I think there's a bit of misunderstanding here. CWH made a request for speedy deletion because he accidentally moved the article to user space instead of the main space. Nobody is trying to delete the well written article or disputing the notability of the subject. I think the AfD request can be safely withdrawn. -Zanhe (talk) 00:20, 13 December 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks to everyone who responded to this matter. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 02:42, 13 December 2017 (UTC)
- Hi CWH, thanks for writing the article! I've nominated it for DYK. See Template:Did you know nominations/Li Huang. Cheers! -Zanhe (talk) 01:42, 16 December 2017 (UTC)
- Zanhe You are a treasure! Many more thanks back to you. I suggested a tweak to the DYK, but if it's too late, either is fine with me.ch (talk) 18:57, 16 December 2017 (UTC)
User group for Military Historians
Greetings,
"Military history" is one of the most important subjects when speak of sum of all human knowledge. To support contributors interested in the area over various language Wikipedias, we intend to form a user group. It also provides a platform to share the best practices between military historians, and various military related projects on Wikipedias. An initial discussion was has been done between the coordinators and members of WikiProject Military History on English Wikipedia. Now this discussion has been taken to Meta-Wiki. Contributors intrested in the area of military history are requested to share their feedback and give suggestions at Talk:Discussion to incubate a user group for Wikipedia Military Historians.
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:29, 21 December 2017 (UTC)
DYK nomination of Li Huang
Hello! Your submission of Li Huang at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 21:11, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
DYK for Li Huang
On 16 January 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Li Huang, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Li Huang co-founded the Chinese Youth Party, which was modelled after the Young Turks? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Li Huang. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Li Huang), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Gatoclass (talk) 00:03, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
April 2018 Milhist Backlog Drive
G'day all, please be advised that throughout April 2018 the Military history Wikiproject is running its annual backlog elimination drive. This will focus on several key areas:
- tagging and assessing articles that fall within the project's scope
- adding or improving listed resources on Milhist's task force pages
- updating the open tasks template on Milhist's task force pages
- creating articles that are listed as "requested" on the project's various lists of missing articles.
As with past Milhist drives, there are points awarded for working on articles in the targeted areas, with barnstars being awarded at the end for different levels of achievement.
The drive is open to all Wikipedians, not just members of the Military history project, although only work on articles that fall (broadly) within the scope of military history will be considered eligible. This year, the Military history project would like to extend a specific welcome to members of Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red, and we would like to encourage all participants to consider working on helping to improve our coverage of women in the military. This is not the sole focus of the edit-a-thon, though, and there are aspects that hopefully will appeal to pretty much everyone.
The drive starts at 00:01 UTC on 1 April and runs until 23:59 UTC on 30 April 2018. Those interested in participating can sign up here.
For the Milhist co-ordinators, AustralianRupert and MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:53, 27 March 2018 (UTC)
Discretionary sanctions notification
Please carefully read this information:
The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding pseudoscience and fringe science, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.- There's also one for Acupuncture that normally is raised in the context of complementary and alternative medicine, but I think it does kind of establish that pre-modern practices relating to Qi flow which make scientifically testable claims fall under sanctions. Ian.thomson (talk) 02:52, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
- I have noted on the Feng Shui TAlk Page and Ian.thomson's Talk Page that this is WP:UNCIVIL. I have done nothing to provoke this warning: I have edited neither page nor have I expressed opinions that go against what Ian.thomson says are his on the Feng Shui Talk Page. REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE.ch (talk) 04:02, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
- 1) Keep calm and assume good faith. If the template is not civil, then why would the Arbitration Committee have authorized its creation? Why would it be standard procedure to use the template to notify users who are not aware of discretionary sanctions?
- 2) Re-read the template with said assumption of good faith. You asked what the discretionary sanctions were, remember? The message outright says that it
does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.
- 3) Remove the template yourself if you want it gone. To insist that I do it is just petty, almost to the point of bullying. Don't be a screaming diva about this.
- Ian.thomson (talk) 04:10, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
- I have noted on the Feng Shui TAlk Page and Ian.thomson's Talk Page that this is WP:UNCIVIL. I have done nothing to provoke this warning: I have edited neither page nor have I expressed opinions that go against what Ian.thomson says are his on the Feng Shui Talk Page. REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE.ch (talk) 04:02, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Feng shui discussions - can I help clarify anything at this point?
Are there any explanations that you'd still like from me at this point? I don't think I have much to add to what's already been said. Basically, I went for help at FTN because the topic falls under ArbEnf, we didn't seem to be communicating well, and you and others persisted with including the changes. --Ronz (talk) 16:09, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
- Ronz, Ian.thomson, another threat made by what sometimes seems to like an anti-quack gestapo. If you people are really so certain that you are right, why do you always need a friend to back yourself up?
- I don't believe a thing about Feng Shui either. But you don't see me harassing other users about it with templates that serve no purpose. There are many great Wikipedia policies that can be referred to, to begin with the core policies, but the only section of that I see you guys refer to is WP:FRINGE, making threats with templates to any editor of an article that you deem goes against science. I detest your methods, as I believe they don't contribute a to a better encyclopedia.--Farang Rak Tham (Talk) 22:08, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
Filial piety and Buddhism?
What do you think of the article about filial piety? I like to know your opinion.--Farang Rak Tham (Talk) 22:10, 25 August 2018 (UTC)