Jump to content

User talk:CAPTAIN RAJU/Archive 17

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 10Archive 15Archive 16Archive 17Archive 18Archive 19Archive 20

Fiona Culley

Please do not delete this page as I am building the content now. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ChelseaSOgden2708 (talkcontribs) 22:31, 5 July 2016 (UTC)

Hello,

I need to update the logo in my company page. Can you help me with that? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.62.168.25 (talk) 19:01, 6 July 2016 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on User talk:Supreme g Khan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Blake Gripling (talk) 03:26, 7 July 2016 (UTC)

how do you know alistair overeem born in england? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikiediteveryday (talkcontribs) 04:11, 7 July 2016 (UTC)

Visigothic coinage

Hello. Am translating this page from Italian Wikipedia where it is featured :) Don't worry about the missing content, will be much longer when I'm done with it ! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Almapple (talkcontribs) 18:41, 7 July 2016 (UTC)

Reference errors on 7 July

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:17, 8 July 2016 (UTC)

 Fixed - CAPTAIN RAJU () 05:57, 8 July 2016 (UTC)

Hi, Captain Raju. I am forming a WP:CRIC task force for cricket in Bangladesh. Would you please to be interested in joining? Thank you. Regards, Naz | talk | contribs 14:40, 8 July 2016 (UTC) Hi again, Captain Raju. Welcome to the task force and happy editing. Thank you. Regards, Naz | talk | contribs 18:30, 8 July 2016 (UTC)

This week's article for improvement (week 28, 2016)

An ear of rye
Hello, CAPTAIN RAJU.

The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection:

Rye

Please be bold and help to improve this article!


Previous selections: Answering machine • Home page


Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations


Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:07, 11 July 2016 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • Opt-out instructions

Hey, I did not know that I had to write a certain way to add content and there was nothing indicating of had to support it with a reliable source. One would figure the program would automatically ask, if it's needed, since it was rather a hassle to actually start an account here. I don't know what you would call a reliable source, but I work at the place where he got married this weekend. If that's not enough for you, please let me know and I'll just delete my account here again. Thanks and have a nice day. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pflueftl (talkcontribs) 02:55, 11 July 2016 (UTC)

15:15, 11 July 2016 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #217

Reply to your message

If I don't receive an answer to my reply to you, I will cancel my account cause it's senseless if someone writes to leave a message and then no answer. Thanks

Reply to your message

If I don't receive an answer to my reply to you, I will cancel my account cause it's senseless if someone writes to leave a message and then no answer. Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pflueftl (talkcontribs) 03:58, 12 July 2016 (UTC)

Ahoy!

Arrrr, ye be the captein of this here vessel? Why you be nothin' more than a scurvy landlubber, we need to fill ye with meat. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 107.77.216.95 (talk) 10:24, 12 July 2016 (UTC)

Regarding Askmebazaar edits

You just reverted my contribution to the page AskMeBazaar. There is no reference to the negative content posted on the page and it must be deleted. The page must be semi-protected to avoid IP vandalism. Becktea (talk) 18:40, 12 July 2016 (UTC)

This Month in GLAM: June 2016





Headlines
Read this edition in fullSingle-page

To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. Past editions may be viewed here.

is it true to say, sundar pichai completed his 12th class in vana vani school — Preceding unsigned comment added by 103.15.63.82 (talk) 08:25, 14 July 2016 (UTC)

HELP

Hey man, any idea how to get the little sidebar with a athletes picture n info like personal info, birthday, etc. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.93.12.97 (talk) 20:34, 14 July 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Oroantral fistula

Hello CAPTAIN RAJU, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Oroantral fistula, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Contains sufficient content to be a stub. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. ϢereSpielChequers 21:33, 14 July 2016 (UTC)

Your undoing of my correction in Tracfone Wireless

The correction I made was to the proper spelling of the past tense of the verb "lead." The past tense is properly spelled "led" while it was improperly spelled in the present tense form of "lead." I request that you reinstate the correction of the spelling error. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.143.38.184 (talk) 03:38, 15 July 2016 (UTC)

Your arrogant communication in defence of the indefensible

Captain Raju. I have originated and edited articles from the inception of Wikipedia. It is not appropriate that you send me, a retired university academic, a litany of offensive ridicule involving "sandbox" use or that I have my editing described as "experimental" by you. Wikipedia is a democracy, albeit with rules - not an oligarchy. You appear not to know how to speak to your fellow wikipedians without condescention. I am 64, have contributed 40 years of academic writing to my discipline and, moreover, worked intimately and hands-on with the Billy Graham Evangelistic Association at SPREE '73 (1973) in Olympia and Earls Court,and MISSION ENGLAND (mid-1980s, when I was a theology undergraduate) in venues in the south of England. I know others who know the evangelist, and have read his biographies. I speak of what I know, accurately and without prejudice, and didn't edit for the fun of it, though it would have been better had I logged on before editing his article. I believe in Wikipedia's core values of accuracy and lack of prejudice; it is not a platform for the advertisement of anybody's agenda, not yours, not mine, not Dr Graham's. Biographical articles are not meant to be polished up 'advertising puff' for any individual, and Graham is not above reproach just because he espouses the religious beliefs of those, possibly like yourself, who may be unable to see or know the reality of his conduct due to their attachment to his belief position. Your remarks to me don't deal factually with what you find objectionable, you merely insult me as if I am some tinkering wiki-amateur. This implies you have no rational grounds for reversion. It seems you see yourself as a senior player who has executive control. I am not aware of wikipedia being other than democratic. It is certainly not acceptable for followers or believers to airbrush out the truth of religious or cult figures to illegitimately protect anybody's dogma or reputation. I likely have a lot more hands-on awareness of the matters pertaining here than you possess or were aware of. The paragraphs cited in the article as written, before my intervention, assert with greater emphasis than the accusation, (which is an accurate one), points of defence that amount to focussing, (insisting, even), on his spokesmen's unsubstantiated "whitewashing" of his motivation, rather than what the Nixon-period tapes reveal. And you cannot insist I leave alone a chauvinistic glossing over of Graham's record. I assert my right to edit bona fide, without your permission or ridicule, in the light of my personal knowledge of the history and circumstances of Graham's behaviour. I don't wish to get into a reversion war, but neither will I knuckle under to your high-handed and insolent remarks. If we cannot agree, we can seek arbitration via appropriate wiki mediation. Sincerely and without prejudice,Trevor H. (UK) 05:57, 15 July 2016 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Trevor H. (talkcontribs)

(talk page watcher) @Trevor H.: The best place to discuss content of a particular article is the talk page of the article. There's a saying "Bold, Revert, Discuss": you made a change, he reverted, now discuss on the talk page where other editors can contribute. It's also a courtesy to all readers of a talk page, including its owner, if you give a link to the article under discussion to make it easier to see what you're talking about (I was curious, so looked around and found it). And please note that your own personal knowledge is never acceptable as a Wikipedia source - everything has to be sourced to Reliable sources. This is often a problem for academics in particular, as they are accustomed to being a recognised authority but find that here in Wikipedia sources are everything, a difficult difference.
I think you may be over-reacting somewhat to a perhaps over-hasty (and totally uninformative) revert where the editor clicked on a button as "test edit" without bothering to explain any further why they objected to your edit (though editing without logging in is always unwise, as it means that you appear to be dropping in from nowhere, rather than being an established editor, and I think this probably leads many editors to be more sceptical about the edits). The message they left on your IP talk page, with mentions of sandbox, was a purely standard template message. It's an WP:AGF message, where something might be vandalism or might be an experiment. They say "Don't template the regulars" (well, some say - others disagree), but you gave no indication that you were a regular. Even so, he should have given you some reason for reverting your change: there is scope to add an extra message to the end of a standard template message.
@CAPTAIN RAJU: Please be more informative when you revert an edit, even if it's from an IP. See what distress you can cause by reverting without explanation. PamD 07:40, 15 July 2016 (UTC)

Gee I bet you guys have to deal with that constantly. (Sega)

Sorry, guess I should have minded my own business but I really hate stuff like that. It's so petty and stupid and I can only imagine what it's like on the historical figure side. You guys are cool. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.192.74.153 (talk) 12:24, 15 July 2016 (UTC)

Gee I bet you guys have to deal with that constantly. (Sega)

Sorry, guess I should have minded my own business but I really hate stuff like that. It's so petty and stupid and I can only imagine what it's like on the historical figure side. You're pretty good. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.192.74.153 (talk) 12:25, 15 July 2016 (UTC)

Reversion of edit to John Lewis Partnership

Hello,

Thank you for your keenness in reverting the edit made to the John Lewis Partnership. Unfortunately in this case, the edit made is correct - the MD for Waitrose is in fact Rob Collins (see: http://www.johnlewispartnership.co.uk/about/waitrose/management-team.html) and it has been well publicised in London regarding Mark Price's departure.

I've corrected the reversion but would welcome a quick cross check before reverting edits as vandalism in future... I've made the same mistake myself before and it's worth a quick check on Google before firing off warnings to users.

Cheers, and keep up the good work!

Cpl Syx [talk] 13:55, 15 July 2016 (UTC)

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi CAPTAIN RAJU! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 21:27, Friday, July 15, 2016 (UTC)

This week's article for improvement (week 29, 2016)

Hello, CAPTAIN RAJU.

The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection:

Sun deck

Please be bold and help to improve this article!


Previous selections: Rye • Answering machine


Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations


Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:08, 18 July 2016 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • Opt-out instructions
12:01, 18 July 2016 (UTC)