User talk:Buzzapper

Hello! welcome to my talk page.

Hello If you think I have made any mistakes, please let me know

And I’m ready to lend a helping hand! Buzzapper (talk) 21:43, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Awamedica

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Awamedica requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://brandkri.com/awamedica/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. VickKiang (talk) 23:52, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

TaqTaq moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to TaqTaq. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it needs more sources to establish notability and the complex narrative of the town's history requires better sourcing - Arabic sources are fine to use, BTW. Suggest resubmitting through the AfC process.. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Alexandermcnabb (talk) 12:16, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hey @Alexandermcnabb

Thank you for your promotional efforts!

I will definitely continue to improve and add more resources to the page

But the town is a Kurdish town, so I don't think it has an Arabic origin

But let me definitely try!

thank you. Buzzapper (talk) 21:11, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wikimedia and copyright

Please stop uploading copyrighted images to Wikimedia Commons and adding them to articles here. You can see Wikipedia:Copyright violations for why we think freely licensed content is important, and Licensing on Wikimedia Commons for what images we can accept. Thank you! Ed ^{[talk] [OMT]} 03:49, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@The ed17

Actually, sorry for the mistake I made

Thank you very much for letting me know! Buzzapper (talk) 21:10, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: TaqTaq has been accepted

TaqTaq, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Vanderwaalforces (talk) 07:41, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Iraqi Armed Forces

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Iraqi Armed Forces, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 21:15, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

December 2023

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Drmies (talk) 03:11, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Buzzapper (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here Buzzapper (talk) 21:07, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Duplicate request placed in a section header. Only one request is needed, and edits should be placed in the larger edit window. 331dot (talk) 23:54, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Buzzapper (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I want to talk about this case that has been handed over to me I have no knowledge of the case and I don't know anything about it And I followed Wikipedia's rules and then set up an account that I edit very little in Wikipedia, which is not very active I have tried to improve Wikipedia, especially the pages related to the WikiProject on Iraq I have read all the rules and regulations even before I set up an account, so I ask you to close this case against me. I fully comply with Wikipedia's rules and have no other accounts

I would be very happy if you could help me close my case. Buzzapper (talk) 21:07, 12 December 2023(talk) 21:07, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This doesn't address the reason for the block described in the SPI. 331dot (talk) 23:57, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.