User talk:Butterdiplomat

Welcome!

Hi Butterdiplomat! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! I dream of horses ^{(Contribs) (Talk)} 16:24, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Shieh Jhy-wey has been accepted

Shieh Jhy-wey, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 20:37, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

November 2023

Hello, I'm Adakiko. I noticed that in this edit to Chen Kuang-fu, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Adakiko (talk) 10:39, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I reverted to the previous version and added the respective election articles as see alsos. Wanted to keep the content on this page cleaned up (instead of just a bunch of electoral tables that can be found on the other pages). Butterdiplomat (talk) 10:57, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

In addition, most of the tables were actually unsourced! Please allow me to continue improving upon the article. I am adding more content and sources as we speak. Butterdiplomat (talk) 11:05, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Aggarwala2727. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Ill-gotten Party Assets Settlement Committee have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. aggarwala2727 (talk) 12:06, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Please explain what was not constructive. I fixed a redirecting link (Republic of China to Taiwan) given the agency was founded in the modern era, and reworded the description. Both were minor edits that clarified the article. Butterdiplomat (talk) 12:13, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Chen Ying (politician) has been accepted

Chen Ying (politician), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

~~ αvírαm|(tαlk) 18:43, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Recent Discussion

Just to let you know we are are being discussed at WP:DRN#Republic of China (Taiwan), and the admin said that WP:COMMONNAME is correct. And there are some more maybe you can read the main info (I) section --- Cat12zu3 (talk) 11:42, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

In WP:DRN#Republic of China (Taiwan) said, quote: The editors who said that we use the common name are correct..., and the admin in the noticeboard had reverse that edit (Special:Diff/1189466022), still there are more so it's worth to read the infobox at the noticeboard including about template. Thanks. --- Cat12zu3 (talk) 11:56, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kungkuan Giljegiljaw has been accepted

Kungkuan Giljegiljaw, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Xegma(talk) 11:27, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Butterdiplomat (talk) 12:44, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Organized crime in Taiwan has been accepted

Organized crime in Taiwan, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Jamiebuba (talk) 09:31, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Military history of Taiwan has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Military history of Taiwan. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 20:06, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Yes, aware of the redirect and have made a hatnote to address in the draft. Butterdiplomat (talk) 14:39, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

LabTurbo Biotech moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to LabTurbo Biotech. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. BoraVoro (talk) 12:17, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Will continue working on the draft and adding sources to establish notability. Butterdiplomat (talk) 13:30, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Butterdiplomat! Your additions to Draft:Taiwan and the United Nations have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 23:18, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I’m not sure this was warranted. I added sources for all content added. Would you mind looking into what exactly was problematic or help me revert this removal if possible? Butterdiplomat (talk) 01:29, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Here is a link to the CopyPatrol report. Click on the iThenticate link to view what was found by the detection service. Citing your sources is great, but copying prose from your sources is not allowed, whether you cite your source or not. It's a violation of our copyright policy to do so. — Diannaa (talk) 02:13, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, got it. Thank you. Will make another attempt and paraphrase better. Butterdiplomat (talk) 02:51, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to the drive!

Welcome, welcome, welcome Butterdiplomat! I'm glad that you are joining the drive! Please, have a cup of WikiTea, and go cite some articles.

Fix a random page lacking sources

CactiStaccingCrane (talk)18:40, 1 February 2024 UTC [refresh]via JWB and Geardona (talk to me?)

DYK for Yun Hai

On 11 February 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Yun Hai, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that New York store Yun Hai raised nine times its fundraising target to support Taiwanese farmers after China banned the import of their pineapples? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Yun Hai. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Yun Hai), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

—Kusma (talk) 00:02, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Butterdiplomat (talk) 13:49, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Taiwan and the United Nations (February 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.

This submission appears to be taken from blognguyenvanhuy.blogspot.com/p/62b-troi-inh-mien-nam-thua-cuoc-chien-e_7.html, skyscrapercity.com/threads/chinese-relations-and-investment-in-somalia.1606386/page-3. Wikipedia cannot accept material copied from elsewhere, unless it explicitly and verifiably has been released to the world under a suitably free and compatible copyright license or into the public domain and is written in an acceptable tone—this includes material that you own the copyright to. You should attribute the content of a draft to outside sources, using citations, but copying and pasting or closely paraphrasing sources is not acceptable. The entire draft should be written using your own words and structure.

You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

Draft:Taiwan and the United Nations may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page. or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Geardona (talk to me?) 17:34, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Butterdiplomat! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Geardona (talk to me?) 17:34, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Much appreciated. The sections marked as copyrighted work was actually almost all taken from China and the United Nations verbatim (with the intention to siphon the relevant content from that article into this one). Since the content was so well-sourced and in Wikipedia format, I wonder if it is possible that the blog post had taken the content from that original article? Please let me know what the best way to proceed is. In the meantime, I am happy to start piecing and paraphrasing these sections. Butterdiplomat (talk) 03:53, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

RFA2024 update: no longer accepting new proposals in phase I

Hey there! This is to let you know that phase I of the 2024 requests for adminship (RfA) review is now no longer accepting new proposals. Lots of proposals remain open for discussion, and the current round of review looks to be on a good track towards making significant progress towards improving RfA's structure and environment. I'd like to give my heartfelt thanks to everyone who has given us their idea for change to make RfA better, and the same to everyone who has given the necessary feedback to improve those ideas. The following proposals remain open for discussion:

Proposal 2, initiated by HouseBlaster, provides for the addition of a text box at Wikipedia:Requests for adminship reminding all editors of our policies and enforcement mechanisms around decorum.
Proposals 3 and 3b, initiated by Barkeep49 and Usedtobecool, respectively, provide for trials of discussion-only periods at RfA. The first would add three extra discussion-only days to the beginning, while the second would convert the first two days to discussion-only.
Proposal 5, initiated by SilkTork, provides for a trial of RfAs without threaded discussion in the voting sections.
Proposals 6c and 6d, initiated by BilledMammal, provide for allowing users to be selected as provisional admins for a limited time through various concrete selection criteria and smaller-scale vetting.
Proposal 7, initiated by Lee Vilenski, provides for the "General discussion" section being broken up with section headings.
Proposal 9b, initiated by Reaper Eternal, provides for the requirement that allegations of policy violation be substantiated with appropriate links to where the alleged misconduct occured.
Proposals 12c, 21, and 21b, initiated by City of Silver, Ritchie333, and HouseBlaster, respectively, provide for reducing the discretionary zone, which currently extends from 65% to 75%. The first would reduce it 65%–70%, the second would reduce it to 50%–66%, and the third would reduce it to 60%–70%.
Proposal 13, initiated by Novem Lingaue, provides for periodic, privately balloted admin elections.
Proposal 14, initiated by Kusma, provides for the creation of some minimum suffrage requirements to cast a vote.
Proposals 16 and 16c, initiated by Thebiguglyalien and Soni, respectively, provide for community-based admin desysop procedures. 16 would desysop where consensus is established in favor at the administrators' noticeboard; 16c would allow a petition to force reconfirmation.
Proposal 16e, initiated by BilledMammal, would extend the recall procedures of 16 to bureaucrats.
Proposal 17, initiated by SchroCat, provides for "on-call" admins and 'crats to monitor RfAs for decorum.
Proposal 18, initiated by theleekycauldron, provides for lowering the RfB target from 85% to 75%.
Proposal 24, initiated by SportingFlyer, provides for a more robust alternate version of the optional candidate poll.
Proposal 25, initiated by Femke, provides for the requirement that nominees be extended-confirmed in addition to their nominators.
Proposal 27, initiated by WereSpielChequers, provides for the creation of a training course for admin hopefuls, as well as periodic retraining to keep admins from drifting out of sync with community norms.
Proposal 28, initiated by HouseBlaster, tightens restrictions on multi-part questions.

To read proposals that were closed as unsuccessful, please see Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/2024 review/Phase I/Closed proposals. You are cordially invited once again to participate in the open discussions; when phase I ends, phase II will review the outcomes of trial proposals and refine the implementation details of other proposals. Another notification will be sent out when this phase begins, likely with the first successful close of a major proposal. Happy editing! theleekycauldron (talk • she/her), via:

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:52, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Taiwan and the United Nations (April 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.

This submission appears to be taken from https://blognguyenvanhuy.blogspot.com/p/62b-troi-inh-mien-nam-thua-cuoc-chien-e_7.html. Wikipedia cannot accept material copied from elsewhere, unless it explicitly and verifiably has been released to the world under a suitably free and compatible copyright license or into the public domain and is written in an acceptable tone—this includes material that you own the copyright to. You should attribute the content of a draft to outside sources, using citations, but copying and pasting or closely paraphrasing sources is not acceptable. The entire draft should be written using your own words and structure.

You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

Draft:Taiwan and the United Nations may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page. or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Toadette ^{(April Fools Day!)} 08:24, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Please could you check the talk page? Apologies, I thought it had been acknowledged that the blog site was a backwards copy of China and the United Nations, from which this article was intended to replace partially. Butterdiplomat (talk) 02:01, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Huang Jian-jhong

Hello, Butterdiplomat. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Huang Jian-jhong, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:05, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

RFA2024 update: phase I concluded, phase II begins

Hi there! Phase I of the Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/2024 review has concluded, with several impactful changes gaining community consensus and proceeding to various stages of implementation. Some proposals will be implemented in full outright; others will be discussed at phase II before being implemented; and still others will proceed on a trial basis before being brought to phase II. The following proposals have gained consensus:

Proposals 2 and 9b (phase II discussion): Add a reminder of civility norms at RfA and Require links for claims of specific policy violations
Proposal 3b (in trial): Make the first two days discussion-only
Proposal 13 (in trial): Admin elections
Proposal 14 (implemented): Suffrage requirements
Proposals 16 and 16c (phase II discussion): Allow the community to initiate recall RfAs and Community recall process based on dewiki
Proposal 17 (phase II discussion): Have named Admins/crats to monitor infractions
Proposal 24 (phase II discussion): Provide better mentoring for becoming an admin and the RfA process
Proposal 25 (implemented): Require nominees to be extended confirmed

See the project page for a full list of proposals and their outcomes. A huge thank-you to everyone who has participated so far :) looking forward to seeing lots of hard work become a reality in phase II. theleekycauldron (talk), via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:08, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Administrative divisions of the ROC

Please jump to the Talk:Taiwan section. Thank you! Silence of Lambs (talk) 15:18, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Draft accepted.

Accepted Taiwan and the United Nations Geardona (talk to me?) 14:44, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! I will cleanup the OVERCITE issue. Really appreciate your help on this one. Butterdiplomat (talk) 14:49, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:LabTurbo Biotech

Hello, Butterdiplomat. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:LabTurbo Biotech, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:06, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Huang Jian-jhong (August 31)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Aaron Liu was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Being a mayor of a city doesn't meet WP:NPOL. Only the NOWNews source has significant coverage that isn't just summarizing what he says (intellectual independence is a notability criterion), so this fails general notability as well. I would also heavily recommend that you crop the unflattering portrait to only include his head and shoulders if you can't find a better image. I think he's reaching out to slap me.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Huang Jian-jhong and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Aaron Liu (talk) 19:19, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:LabTurbo Biotech

Hello, Butterdiplomat. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "LabTurbo Biotech".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:48, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

RFA2024 update: Discussion-only period now open for review

Hi there! The trial of the RfA discussion-only period passed at WP:RFA2024 has concluded, and after open discussion, the RfC is now considering whether to retain, modify, or discontinue it. You are invited to participate at Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/2024 review/Phase II/Discussion-only period. Cheers, and happy editing! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:38, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:55, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrocession Day vs. Retrocession of Taiwan

I understand the perspective issue surrounding the term "retrocession," yet both articles continue to use it, whether in Chinese or English. As defined in Retrocession Day, "Retrocession Day is the annual observance and former public holiday..." This suggests the day is commemorated annually. Are you implying that the handover occurs every year? Free ori (talk) 05:53, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I think the use of retrocession is inappropriate in most of these cases, and that actually includes “Retrocession Day” too. As it stands currently, linking to an article about the term is akin to linking “Barack Obama was born …” to Barack Obama citizenship conspiracy theories or US government references to Deep state in the United States. A possible solution would be to move “Retrocession of Taiwan” to a more appropriate article name, and have it include the terms. Butterdiplomat (talk) 12:25, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your clarification.

First, as a common name, "Retrocession of Taiwan" is not a conspiracy theory, though controversial for many people. "Retrocession" is currently used as part of the article name on both Chinese and Japanese Wikipedia. It is also a common name in many English sources and even used by those who disagree:

Executive Yuan: ROC to celebrate 70th anniversary of retrocession
Ministry of Foreign Affairs: Commemorating the 70th Anniversary of Victory in the War of Resistance Against Japan and the Treaty of Peace between Japan and the ROC
Chunghwa Post: Commemorative 26 Retocession of Taiwan Commemorative Issue (1947)
National 228 Memorial Museum: The 228 Incident. "In the so-called 'retrocession' of Taiwan in 1945 was a 'unification' of China and Taiwan. The 228 Incident was a side effect of this unification, caused by the enormous gaps between the Taiwanese and Chinese societies of the time, which made the two ill-suited to one another. " [Although the expressed opinion was not in favour of this name, the name is still used.]
Ministry of Culture: 'Prison Island of Taiwan: Landscape of Injustice under White Terror'. "After the retrocession of Taiwan, the center was taken over by the Republic of China Navy and divided into a military dependents' village, a telecommunication station, and the Fongshan Guest House."
National Taiwan University Hospital: After Retrocession of Taiwan (1945~-1950)

Second, it is not like the Handover of Hong Kong, which is almost exclusively used for the transfer of Hong Kong to the People's Republic of China, although the handover of Hong Kong happened many times in history, at least twice in 1945. Whenever we used "transfer", "handover" or "takeover" for Taiwan, it confuses people and then a lot of further descriptions will be added, e.g. "from Japan" or "to the Republic of China."

Third, if you want to rename any of the two pages, I think it might be better to discuss on the talk page and request more comments from the community.

Cheers, Free ori (talk) 13:12, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the context. I disagree that it is the common name for the event that is also documented in Retreat of the government of the Republic of China to Taiwan. “Retrocession of Taiwan” and “Retrocession Day” are essentially the same concept; they are both proclaimed terminology by historical ROC officials. I do agree that the event that this term describes is unlike the Handover of Hong Kong, and I agree that we should request more comments. Butterdiplomat (talk) 01:08, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Butterdiplomat. Thank you for your work on National At-Large Constituency. Another editor, MPGuy2824, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Please add the list of the 34 current legislators.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|MPGuy2824}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 02:24, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@MPGuy2824: Thank you. I have added the legislators and will continue to translate and expand as appropriate. Butterdiplomat (talk) 15:19, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]