User talk:Bunt56

Bunt56, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Bunt56! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like I JethroBT (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 22 March 2017 (UTC)

March 2017

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Bunt (community). PageImp (talk) 08:08, 25 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kulala

People must meet wp:notability (people) to be included on lists. They almost always should have their own article or have extremely good references. One's own website, biography, or company is not sufficient. Jim1138 (talk) 08:06, 28 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of M.K.Seetharam Kulal

The article M.K.Seetharam Kulal has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Domdeparis (talk) 15:18, 28 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kulala, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gulf. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:07, 29 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sanctions

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

- Sitush (talk) 15:42, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Citing

Hi, I think you may be adding citations at Kulala without actually checking them. I have just had to remove two because they do not say what you think they say. I've left the Alagodi one in there for now but it is meaningless and will have to be fixed. - Sitush (talk) 12:46, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Venur, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tulu. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:57, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, sorry it was a mistake now have changed it thankyou for the information Bunt56 (talk) 12:26, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Mangalore is a Featured Article, and not a Tulu propaganda magazine

Some of your edits in Mangalore don't include citations.
There is no proper formatting as well.
Remember that Mangalore is a Featured Article and not a Tulu propaganda magazine. 223.186.36.9 (talk) 18:37, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sources

Please read Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources: Websites like tuluadda.com are not acceptable sources. utcursch | talk 14:12, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please protect the Mangalore article from Vandalism

I request you to protect the Mangalore article from Vandalism.
Please be very careful while editing the Mangalore article.
Please stop adding biased and promotional content into the Mangalore article.
No Administrator is protecting this article and it will be delisted (removed) from the list of Featured Articles.
Check this out:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Featured_article_review#Mangalore 223.186.205.129 (talk) 16:57, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Bunt56. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

February 2018

Hello, I'm Linguisticgeek. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Bunt (community) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Linguisticgeek (talk) 15:51, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Linguisticgeek (talk) 14:55, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note

The Wikipedia community has permitted administrators to impose discretionary sanctions on any editor who is active on any page about social groups, explicitly including caste associations and political parties, related to India, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and Nepal. Discretionary sanctions can be used against an editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behavior, or any normal editorial process. If you engage in further inappropriate behavior in this area, you may be placed under sanctions, which can include blocks, a revert limitation, or a topic ban. The discussion leading to the imposition of these sanctions can be read here.

Please familiarise yourself with the information page at Wikipedia:General sanctions/South Asian social groups.

--NeilN ^{talk to me} 19:05, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Bunt (community)

Please explain how the material you removed is unsourced. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 14:16, 28 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that if no acceptable explanation is given then you will be looking at a topic ban. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 14:26, 28 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@NeilN: there is no acceptable explanation. The stuff was reliably sourced, as it also was at Kulala. Bunt56 has been doing this sort of thing for a while now on articles where we know sockfarms have been operating. - Sitush (talk) 14:34, 28 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

March 2018

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Bunt (community). Sitush (talk) 16:56, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

To enforce community authorised sanctions,

you have been indefinitely blocked from editing. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Reminder to administrators: Community sanctions are enacted by community consensus. In order to overturn this block, you must either receive the approval of the blocking administrator or consensus at a community noticeboard (you may need to copy and paste their statement to a community noticeboard).

--NeilN ^{talk to me} 17:36, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]