User talk:Brian/Archive 5
This is an archive of past discussions with User:Brian. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | ← | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 | Archive 8 |
Hello Brian!
Thanks for meetup invite
Thanks for your invitation to the Auckland meetup. I'm not sure yet if I can make it, but I'm hoping to come along. -- Avenue 03:47, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
Wikipedia:New Zealand Collaboration of the Fortnight
Firstly, thank you for setting it up and well done, it seems to be beginning to get off the ground. And also thanks for the note on my Wikibreak (I've come to the conclusion that I need to stop using this site as a procrastination tool for my uni work)! The Community Portal would be a good place to advertise the fact that teh collabortation now exists.
Thank you for your hard work! People do really appreciate it. --Midnighttonight 05:58, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
Old Skool Esperanzial note
Since this isn't the result of an AC meeting, I have decided to go Old Skool. This note is to remind you that the elections are taking place now and will end at 23:50 UTC on 2006-04-29. Please vote here. Thanks. --Celestianpower háblame 20:42, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
I´m confused
Hi there Brian,
since you are the admin, as far as I understood, I´d like to ask a question, which I already asked on my personal talk page, but I have to admit: I´m a bit confused.
So far, I did not fully understand the way editing, talking an questioning works here at wiki. The friend of mine, which I could ask, is currently on holiday, so I thought, I drop you a line, since you´ve welcomed me so nicely.
At the mo, after browsing a bit in wikinews, my main question is: Is it: Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 License or is it: Creative Commons 2.5 Attribution License
which I was advised by MrMiscellanious. He told me, the second version is the correct one, but so many people are using the first version. And I can find it all over wikinews in the advices.
Thanks for your help! tara gumboyaya 18:53, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
Mangakino map
Hi Brian - Mangakino missed out before because I only did maps for towns down to a certain size. There's one on the article now :) Grutness...wha? 09:06, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
Esperanza Elections Staff
Hi Brian! I saw that you were signed up for the elections staff for the Esperanza elections. If you have time, please help us out by comparing the votes to the members list. If you get around to do this, please leave notice that you have done so at Wikipedia_talk:Esperanza/Advisory_Council_Elections_April_2006/Tally. Thanks for your time! EWS23 | (Leave me a message!) 17:29, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
sorry about the block,
should be fixed now (I think) -- ( drini's page ☎ ) 01:47, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
I am a Royalist from New Zealand!
Brian, I am a Royalist like you! That User:Lholden is a republican lowlife who talks a load of rubbish! You can find some information about me here; [[1]] . - (192.190.108.19 06:20, 3 May 2006 (UTC))
- Heh, that's about all you and Brian have in common Mr Work. Despite disagreeing on most things, I have always found Brian very civil. Much unlike yourself. --Lholden 09:14, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
its alright
Ya know, its alright, I don't give a flying fuck about Wikipedia. I just think that an encyclopedia should actually be neutral and point out that Peter Ellis is actually a kiddy fiddler rather than some sick cleaning of what he did. He molested children. There is a reason he was found guilty, and a reason every single inquiry into him portrays him as being a guilty child molestor. Because he is. Yet the Wikipedia article makes it sound like it didn't happen. Doesn't Wikipedia have something about actually being neutral? Or is it just whatever people want to say. At least the article on Helen Clakr admits its propaganda.