User talk:Bongo76

May 2016

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to World Wide Web. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Clubjustin (talk) 08:52, 18 May 2016 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at World Wide Web, you may be blocked from editing. Clubjustin (talk) 09:09, 18 May 2016 (UTC)

Did you read the article we are commenting on?

   In the core of the article it is explained that the proposal that Tim Berners-lee writted alone did not pass through, and that with the help of Cailliau he wrote the proposal that lead to the creation of the World Wild Web... so they are clearly co-inventor. --Bongo76 (talk) 09:38, 18 May 2016 (UTC)

The internet Hall of Fame is use as a trusted sources in more than one Wikipedias article, why do you think it is not relevant here?--Bongo76 (talk) 09:38, 18 May 2016 (UTC)

Your edit is not well documented, no reliable source.--Bongo76 (talk) 09:38, 18 May 2016 (UTC)

Should not you be reported for disruptive editing, you should stop disruptive editing when something hurt your personal believes, and not threaten peaple with being blocked from editing, because maybe you will blocked from editing!--Bongo76 (talk) 09:38, 18 May 2016 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at World Wide Web shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
Do not edit while logged out; the reverts you make while logged out count against you. Katie^talk 11:26, 18 May 2016 (UTC)

World Wide Web

Hello! I note your concern over the World Wide Web page. Please go to the Talk Page and read the links I have provided. As you will see, CERN the employer of both Tim Berners-Lee and Robert Cailliau, list Mr Cailliu as Berners Lee's first callaborator on the Web, not a co-inventor. My assertions are not based on opinion, but established fact.

All good wishes to you,

(Etheldavis (talk) 13:27, 18 May 2016 (UTC))

May 2016

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would ask that you assume good faith while interacting with other editors, which you did not on World Wide Web ‎. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Comments like, " thanks to you the page is not accurate, " are just not acceptable here. They are certainly not justified. Andy Dingley (talk) 17:48, 18 May 2016 (UTC)

World Wide Web raised at WP:ANI

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Inventor(s) of the World Wide Web?. Thank you. Andy Dingley (talk) 10:33, 31 May 2016 (UTC)