User talk:Bocah anon

Your recent edits

I inform url of Noah's Map in "Sons of Noah" discussion, and then my IP got banned without any reason or notice. I can't open wikipedia anymore. I wrote this text with mobile. Conclusion: Some wikipedia admin are unfair or have trouble with truth. Bocah anon (talk) 01:21, 16 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia

Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
Maintain a neutral point of view – this is possibly the most important Wikipedia policy.
Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page to follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons' policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
No edit warring and sock puppetry.
If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject. Deliberately adding such content or otherwise editing articles maliciously is considered vandalism; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Dougweller (talk) 13:04, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits

This is becoming spam. Please read WP:RS as your maps don't meet our criteria there, and WP:NOR as you appear to be adding original research to multiple talk pages. If you actually have reliable sources, feel free to add them, but talk pages are not forums for our own ideas (see WP:FORUM). Thank you. Dougweller (talk) 13:07, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Some things you should know about how Wikipedia works

"Truth" is not the criteria for inclusion, verifiability is.
We do not publish original thought.
Reliable sources typically include: articles from magazines or newspapers (particularly scholarly journals), or books by recognized authors (basically, books by respected publishers). Online versions of these are usually accepted, provided they're held to the same standards. User generated sources (like Wikipedia) are to be avoided. Self-published sources should be avoided except for information by and about the subject that is not self-serving (for example, citing a company's website to establish something like year of establishment).
Articles are to be written from a neutral point of view. Wikipedia is not concerned with facts or opinions, it just summarizes reliable sources. Real scholarship actually does not say what understanding of the world is "true," but only with what there is evidence for. In the case of science, this evidence must ultimately start with physical evidence.
Credentials are irrelevant, noone here cares about them, we will ignore them. Ian.thomson (talk) 01:44, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]