Jump to content

User talk:Bmwm8fe

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Bmwm8fe, you are invited to the Teahouse!

[edit]
Teahouse logo

Hi Bmwm8fe! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like GoingBatty (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 28 April 2021 (UTC)


May 2021

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm -Zai-. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Shivangi Joshi, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Zai (💬 • 📝 • ⚡️) 18:00, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Bhaderwah. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 19:08, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Shivangi Joshi. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Zai (💬 • 📝 • ⚡️) 12:33, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Shivangi Joshi. —SpacemanSpiff 18:39, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or change other editors' legitimate talk page comments, as you did at User talk:-Zai-. ‑‑Volteer1 (talk) 19:19, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring, as you did at Shivangi Joshi. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  ~Swarm~ {sting} 18:51, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Bmwm8fe (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))


Request reason:

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

  • the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
  • the block is no longer necessary because you
    1. understand what you have been blocked for,
    2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
    3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. 331dot (talk) 08:20, 18 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

2 reliable sources of India’s most Accredited News Reporting Sites

What’s more Reliable than the Actress /Living person herself saying her birth year is 1998.

How can you prejudice that she is lying and self portraying that she is younger Don’t be Trapped by DOGMA celebrity often celebrate their 35s-45s even 65s birthdays and about other reliable sources -they themselves might have taken info ABOUT HER DoB from WIKIPEDIA itself which is misleading

I don’t think anything more reliable than the LIVING PERSON HERSELF SAYING SHE’s Born in 18 may 1998


RELIABLE SOURCES

1) ABP NEWS

Shivangi Joshi aka Naira answers the most googled questions about her | SBS Originals https://news.abplive.com/videos/entertainment/television-shivangi-joshi-aka-naira-answers-the-most-googled-questions-about-her-sbs-originals-1446483

TIMESTAMP: 1:50/6:25

2)INDIA.com

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Bmwm8fe (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))


Request reason:

Your reason here Editing Based on Reliable Sources From one of India’s most accredited NEWS channels pls Check the references Sources given by me

Decline reason:

You are arguing that you are right, but being right does not excuse edit warring. PhilKnight (talk) 10:01, 18 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Please Don’t have Prejudice check 2 reliable sources 2 reliable sources of India’s most Accredited News Reporting Sites What’s more Reliable than the Actress /Living person herself saying her birth year is 1998. How can you prejudice that she is lying and self portraying that she is younger Don’t be Trapped by DOGMA celebrity often celebrate their 35s-45s even 65s birthdays and about other reliable sources -they themselves might have taken info ABOUT HER DoB from WIKIPEDIA itself which is misleading I don’t think anything more reliable than the LIVING PERSON HERSELF SAYING SHE’s Born in 18 may 1998

RELIABLE SOURCES 1) ABP NEWS Shivangi Joshi aka Naira answers the most googled questions about her | SBS Originals

https://news.abplive.com/videos/entertainment/television-shivangi-joshi-aka-naira-answers-the-most-googled-questions-about-her-sbs-originals-1446483 TIMESTAMP: 1:50/6:25 2)INDIA.com https://www.india.com/hindi-news/entertainment-hindi/shivangi-joshi-birthday-yeh-rishta-kya-kehlata-hais-seerat-aka-shivangi-joshi-salary-income-net-worth-and-cars-4671721/

P.S ) Don’t go by prejudice and Rely on the INFORMATION ℹ️ GIVEN BY LIVING PERSON SHIVANGI JOSHI HERSELF and probably the outdated reliable sources are misleading themselves have taken info from Wikipedia during that time when it was not as organised and are old may be written by fresher Journalist NoWhere in those reliable sources the actress herself is GIVING INFO ABOUT HER DoB it’s just poorly furnished sources

BOTH the Sources which I gave are Latest 2021 Please Change Birth Year 1998 from 1995.................... ~ ~~Bmwm8fe (talk)

Declined unblock requests must remain until the block is removed. You may remove other content, but those must remain. I have fixed the formatting of your request, please only place edits in the larger edit window and not the smaller section header window, which creates unnecessary new sections. This is easier to do in the full desktop version of Wikipedia, even in a browser on a phone, as the app and mobile versions do not have full functionality. 331dot (talk) 09:10, 18 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for resuming edit warring immediately after prior block expired, as you did at Shivangi Joshi. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  â€”SpacemanSpiff 13:32, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  â€”SpacemanSpiff 12:58, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

[edit]

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Bmwm8fe, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Zaitalk 17:12, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]