User talk:Bmarkovic.79

Judiciary Police

Blanking an article isn't welcome here. The page should be deleted.Xx236 (talk) 10:04, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'm still editing the article --Bmarkovic.79 (talk) 10:05, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edits to Sunglasses at Night

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Sunglasses at Night, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! FoCuS contribs; talk to me! 21:06, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Optical (artist) has been accepted

Optical (artist), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Legacypac (talk) 07:14, 11 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Optical (musician)

Hello, Bmarkovic.79. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Optical (musician), for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

edit the page
remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Hzh (talk) 10:09, 12 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'd suggest that you move the article to Ed Rush and Optical and rewrite it as being about the duo, otherwise it is likely to be deleted. Hzh (talk) 10:11, 12 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed move

I think the sources in the Optical (musician) article are not sufficient to justify an article on the individual, but can justify an article on the duo Ed Rush & Optical. If you don't object, I will do this in a few days' time (the content will be adjusted). The article on Optical can always be recreated if you can find sufficient sources about musician alone (and not as part of the duo). However, if you object, you can remove the deletion tag, and try to add sources about the musician independent of the duo (simple listing sites will not be enough). If sources are insufficient to establish notability for the musician, then the article will be proposed for deletion in an AfD discussion. This AfD will be determined by the community to see if the article should be kept or deleted. Hzh (talk) 13:48, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Hzh: I have edited the article to, among other things, add a reference to an article that is specifically about Optical as a separate artist that mentions his other collaborations, solo work, and remixes, and that additionally enforces the claim about the notability of the "To Shape The Future" release. --Bmarkovic.79 (talk) 06:29, 14 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It is a good source and I'm happy with it for now, but note the requirement for multiple nontrivial independent coverage per WP:MUSICBIO. I would therefore recommend adding at least another source (as already indicated, Discogs and other listing sites do not qualify for notability purposes, and AllMusic only counts when it has a professional review), otherwise there is always the risk that someone else may nominate it for deletion. Hzh (talk) 12:46, 14 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Nuxt.js

The article Nuxt.js has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication of notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Frayæ (Talk/Spjall) 16:52, 1 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have added multiple additional resources from notable online publications. I further object proposed deletion on the following grounds:

- The editor that added proposal didn't demonstrate enough technical background in subject matter of software development or information technology to be able to knowledgeably assert either notability or lack of.

- The article subject passes the Wikipedia:SET: see: https://trends.google.com/trends/explore?date=today%205-y&q=nuxt or https://www.google.com/search?q=nuxt

The editor didn't observe Wikipedia:NEXIST in good faith which is evident by lacking the minimum legwork required to find the myriad relevant resources on subject matter online.