Jump to content

User talk:Bloodshot64

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Bloodshot64, you are invited to the Teahouse!

[edit]
Teahouse logo

Hi Bloodshot64! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Dathus (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:04, 2 November 2019 (UTC)

A snipe hunt!

[edit]

Hi Bloodshot64,

Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your edits. I've noticed some of them on Darksiders III, namely these ones. Are you familiar with WP:IDIOM? As a style guide, we try not to use expressions or sayings in articles. In this case, I actually did not know what a snipe hunt meant! Thanks again, and happy editing. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 16:42, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:02, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dying Earth genre, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Alan Grant. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:17, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

September 2021

[edit]

Information icon Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Hi. You have done *some* okay writing and a whole lot of deleted WP:FANCRUFT. I know you're not going to read that vitally mandatory page, nor WP:RS, so just know that users can be blocked for this. You've been using Wikipedia as your personal comic book weblog outlet (WP:NOTBLOG) and I can see that you imagine yourself a writer, but you write in severely broken and verbose English that must often be deleted, rewritten, or heavily edited. Ampersands are not "and", semicolons are not commas, we do not speak in hyperbole, it doesn't matter what happens on other websites (WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS), and comic books are not citations (WP:PRIMARY). You've had countless warnings in edit messages, and tons of your work has been immediately deleted, wasting the time and effort of countless volunteers. You have been educated but you belligerently refuse to understand what an encyclopedia is. Please stop editing until you do or you can be blocked. Thank you.Smuckola(talk) 20:40, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Formatting a primary source as a citation doesn't make it a legitimate encyclopedic citation. Writing infinite plot summaries isn't legitimate encyclopedic content. WP:RS Almost everything you write is WP:FANCRUFT with illegitimate citations. Wikipedia only allows notable WP:N content according to reliable sources WP:RS. Stop arguing and editing, and read all of the policies I'm linking. — Smuckola(talk) 23:49, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:58, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

700-word limit on film plots

[edit]

Please keep the film plot section under 700 words per WP:FILMPLOT. The plot summary is not supposed to be exhaustive. I reverted your addition at Peppermint (2018 film). Binksternet (talk) 17:56, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Please refrain from making changes to plot summaries/synopses that conflict with the plot summary edit guides, as you did at Peppermint (2018 film). You may wish to review the specific guidelines for films, musicals, television episodes, anime/manga, novels and non-fiction books. Excessive detail and high word counts should be avoided. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. I see you've been warned for this kind of stuff before. Please take at least a slight glance at WP:PLOTBLOAT, WP:FANCRUFT, and WP:NOT. And when someone reverts your edit and and is so nice to leave an explanation on your talk page like Binksternet did, you can't just barge back in and put the everything back without at the very least responding to them.

Ironmatic1 (talk) 21:14, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Evil West, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Horror.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:58, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:45, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]