User talk:Blackbeltswag1

Hi There, Unless you have the actual audio plus live feed with the racial and hate comments of the house guests of bb 15 you need to make sure the term "alleged" is used. There is high speculation that David Girton used the term "Black Candace" when referring to sheets, however the sources {99} never actually mention David Girton and are all here say; with no actual proof of what was actually said. Until there is proof, it needs to be removed or edited with a valid source.

July 2013

Hi, can you please stop changing all the endgame infoboxes for the Big Brother (U.S.) articles. Thanks. --MSalmon (talk) 17:24, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Also, week 4 nominations havent occurred yet. Please remove the nomination, veto winner, and renomination names. — Preceding unsigned comment added by EnemySam (talk • contribs) 07:47, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

July 2013

Please do not introduce incorrect information, as you did to Corazón Indomable & Amores verdaderos. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references/sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before editing again. Platinum Star (talk) 14:36, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did with Big Brother 15 (U.S.), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Do not add information to the article until it is confirmed. If you want, watch Big Brother After Dark at 11:00 PM EDT/10 PM CDT and see the results of the nominations. This is your only warning. ~~JHUbal27 23:54, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

PLEASE STOP your disruptive edits that you have made to The Challenge: Rivals II. Your edits constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you wish to experiment, please use the sandbox instead. DPH1110 (talk) 04:55, 26 July 2013 (UTC)DPH1110[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Hell's Kitchen (U.S. season 3)‎. Your edits appear to constitute possible vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. AsceticRosé 06:39, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 19:57, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

August 2013

This is your last warning. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Big Brother 15 (U.S.), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. -happy 5214 12:32, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Big Brother 15 (U.S.), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. You have been reported. DO NOT add false information. ~~JHUbal27 06:33, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism, as you did at Big Brother 15 (U.S.). If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Huon (talk) 07:23, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deliberately and repeatedly adding fake information is something we really don't need. Huon (talk) 07:29, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]