User talk:Birlahouse
Blocked as a sockpuppet
[edit]
Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:Blaxstocatamazon per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Blaxstocatamazon. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped. Izno (talk) 01:54, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
{{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
Unblock
[edit]
Birlahouse (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I am not a sockpuppet. I registered yesterday to contribute positively and so merely added the archive.org links to some links which were not working. Please elucidate how that constitutes being used abusively ie. past, present or future (???). This is not a "Minority Report" world where precogs determine possible future or past abuse. As I understand it abuse has a very technical definition on this website and I have not transgressed it. As I also understand it, archive.org links are allowed in references. In conclusion, I have not seen any evidence presented at the sockpuppet investigation link provided which would establish that I am a sockpuppet of any "master", whereas au contraire it absolutely establishes I am not part of that group and have been blocked on a mere suspicion by a functionary. The bit about edit summaries is unclear to me, should I not provide descriptions for my future edits ? Birlahouse (talk) 04:40, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
Notes:
- In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
- Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
Administrator use only:
If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:
{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I am not a sockpuppet. I registered yesterday to contribute positively and so merely added the archive.org links to some links which were not working. Please elucidate how that constitutes being used abusively ie. past, present or future (???). This is not a "Minority Report" world where precogs determine possible future or past abuse. As I understand it abuse has a very technical definition on this website and I have not transgressed it. As I also understand it, archive.org links are allowed in references. In conclusion, I have not seen any evidence presented at the sockpuppet investigation link provided which would establish that I am a sockpuppet of any "master", whereas au contraire it absolutely establishes I am not part of that group and have been blocked on a mere suspicion by a functionary. The bit about edit summaries is unclear to me, should I not provide descriptions for my future edits ? [[User:Birlahouse|Birlahouse]] ([[User talk:Birlahouse#top|talk]]) 04:40, 22 December 2024 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}
If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.
{{unblock reviewed |1=I am not a sockpuppet. I registered yesterday to contribute positively and so merely added the archive.org links to some links which were not working. Please elucidate how that constitutes being used abusively ie. past, present or future (???). This is not a "Minority Report" world where precogs determine possible future or past abuse. As I understand it abuse has a very technical definition on this website and I have not transgressed it. As I also understand it, archive.org links are allowed in references. In conclusion, I have not seen any evidence presented at the sockpuppet investigation link provided which would establish that I am a sockpuppet of any "master", whereas au contraire it absolutely establishes I am not part of that group and have been blocked on a mere suspicion by a functionary. The bit about edit summaries is unclear to me, should I not provide descriptions for my future edits ? [[User:Birlahouse|Birlahouse]] ([[User talk:Birlahouse#top|talk]]) 04:40, 22 December 2024 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}
If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:
{{unblock reviewed |1=I am not a sockpuppet. I registered yesterday to contribute positively and so merely added the archive.org links to some links which were not working. Please elucidate how that constitutes being used abusively ie. past, present or future (???). This is not a "Minority Report" world where precogs determine possible future or past abuse. As I understand it abuse has a very technical definition on this website and I have not transgressed it. As I also understand it, archive.org links are allowed in references. In conclusion, I have not seen any evidence presented at the sockpuppet investigation link provided which would establish that I am a sockpuppet of any "master", whereas au contraire it absolutely establishes I am not part of that group and have been blocked on a mere suspicion by a functionary. The bit about edit summaries is unclear to me, should I not provide descriptions for my future edits ? [[User:Birlahouse|Birlahouse]] ([[User talk:Birlahouse#top|talk]]) 04:40, 22 December 2024 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}